产时阿奇霉素与安慰剂对新生儿败血症和死亡的影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Roca, Bully Camara, Joel D. Bognini, Usman N. Nakakana, Athasana M. Somé, Nathalie Beloum, Toussaint Rouamba, Fatoumata Sillah, Madikoi Danso, Joquina C. Jones, Shashu Graves, Isatou Jagne, Pauline Getanda, Saffiatou Darboe, Marc C. Tahita, Ebrahim Ndure, Hien S. Franck, Sawadogo Y. Edmond, Bai L. Dondeh, Wilfried G. J. Nassa, Zakaria Garba, Abdoulie Bojang, Yusupha Nije, Christian Bottomley, Halidou Tinto, Umberto D'Alessandro
{"title":"产时阿奇霉素与安慰剂对新生儿败血症和死亡的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Anna Roca, Bully Camara, Joel D. Bognini, Usman N. Nakakana, Athasana M. Somé, Nathalie Beloum, Toussaint Rouamba, Fatoumata Sillah, Madikoi Danso, Joquina C. Jones, Shashu Graves, Isatou Jagne, Pauline Getanda, Saffiatou Darboe, Marc C. Tahita, Ebrahim Ndure, Hien S. Franck, Sawadogo Y. Edmond, Bai L. Dondeh, Wilfried G. J. Nassa, Zakaria Garba, Abdoulie Bojang, Yusupha Nije, Christian Bottomley, Halidou Tinto, Umberto D'Alessandro","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000979648.94036.ac","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, and rates have not decreased in recent years despite medical advances. Azithromycin has been shown in previous research to be effective in reducing infection and sepsis; in particular, a recent study showed that administration of the drug during labor reduced gram-positive bacteria over the next 4 weeks, along with reduced disease in mothers and newborns. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin administered during labor in reducing instances of neonatal sepsis and mortality. The primary outcome for this study was neonatal sepsis or death within the first 28 days of life. Deaths that were identifiably due to severe birth asphyxia, low birth weight, and severe congenital malformations were excluded. Secondary outcomes included neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality, culture-confirmed sepsis, fever, skin infections, bacterially confirmed skin infections, conjunctivitis, umbilical infection/omphalitis, malaria, prescribed antibiotics, and hospitalization. Secondary outcomes for parents included postpartum sepsis, bacterially confirmed postpartum sepsis, mastitis, malaria, puerperal fever, prescribed antibiotics, hospitalization, and mortality. The final analysis included 11,625 parents and 11,783 neonates; baseline characteristics between the azithromycin and placebo groups were not significantly different. Of the total sample, 225 instances of neonatal sepsis or death occurred. The incidence of either mortality or sepsis was similar between groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.38; P = 0.70), as well as the individual outcomes of mortality (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70–1.60; P = 0.80) and sepsis (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.74–1.40; P = 0.92). Incidence of neonatal skin infections ( P < 0.001), bacterially confirmed skin infections ( P = 0.003), and need for antibiotics ( P < 0.001) were all significantly reduced in the azithromycin group. Azithromycin reduced instances of both mastitis ( P = 0.04) and puerperal fever ( P = 0.04), but there were no other significant differences between groups. These results indicate no effect of azithromycin on neonatal sepsis or mortality. There were reductions in some instances of infection in both parents and newborns, specifically newborn skin infections, but there was no effect on the primary outcome. These results are in contrast to the previous proof-of-concept trial that showed azithromycin to reduce the amount of gram-positive bacteria carried by mothers and infants. Recent studies from different countries have found some conflicting results in longer-term outcomes, but the differing time periods limit comparison of results. This study was limited by underestimation of incidence of infections due to follow-up design, as well as slight differences between the 2 countries involved in the study. Overall, the results of this analysis do not support a change in clinical practice to introduce azithromycin to prevent neonatal sepsis and mortality.","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Intrapartum Azithromycin vs Placebo on Neonatal Sepsis and Death A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Anna Roca, Bully Camara, Joel D. Bognini, Usman N. Nakakana, Athasana M. Somé, Nathalie Beloum, Toussaint Rouamba, Fatoumata Sillah, Madikoi Danso, Joquina C. Jones, Shashu Graves, Isatou Jagne, Pauline Getanda, Saffiatou Darboe, Marc C. Tahita, Ebrahim Ndure, Hien S. Franck, Sawadogo Y. Edmond, Bai L. Dondeh, Wilfried G. J. Nassa, Zakaria Garba, Abdoulie Bojang, Yusupha Nije, Christian Bottomley, Halidou Tinto, Umberto D'Alessandro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ogx.0000979648.94036.ac\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, and rates have not decreased in recent years despite medical advances. Azithromycin has been shown in previous research to be effective in reducing infection and sepsis; in particular, a recent study showed that administration of the drug during labor reduced gram-positive bacteria over the next 4 weeks, along with reduced disease in mothers and newborns. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin administered during labor in reducing instances of neonatal sepsis and mortality. The primary outcome for this study was neonatal sepsis or death within the first 28 days of life. Deaths that were identifiably due to severe birth asphyxia, low birth weight, and severe congenital malformations were excluded. Secondary outcomes included neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality, culture-confirmed sepsis, fever, skin infections, bacterially confirmed skin infections, conjunctivitis, umbilical infection/omphalitis, malaria, prescribed antibiotics, and hospitalization. Secondary outcomes for parents included postpartum sepsis, bacterially confirmed postpartum sepsis, mastitis, malaria, puerperal fever, prescribed antibiotics, hospitalization, and mortality. The final analysis included 11,625 parents and 11,783 neonates; baseline characteristics between the azithromycin and placebo groups were not significantly different. Of the total sample, 225 instances of neonatal sepsis or death occurred. The incidence of either mortality or sepsis was similar between groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.38; P = 0.70), as well as the individual outcomes of mortality (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70–1.60; P = 0.80) and sepsis (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.74–1.40; P = 0.92). Incidence of neonatal skin infections ( P < 0.001), bacterially confirmed skin infections ( P = 0.003), and need for antibiotics ( P < 0.001) were all significantly reduced in the azithromycin group. Azithromycin reduced instances of both mastitis ( P = 0.04) and puerperal fever ( P = 0.04), but there were no other significant differences between groups. These results indicate no effect of azithromycin on neonatal sepsis or mortality. There were reductions in some instances of infection in both parents and newborns, specifically newborn skin infections, but there was no effect on the primary outcome. These results are in contrast to the previous proof-of-concept trial that showed azithromycin to reduce the amount of gram-positive bacteria carried by mothers and infants. Recent studies from different countries have found some conflicting results in longer-term outcomes, but the differing time periods limit comparison of results. This study was limited by underestimation of incidence of infections due to follow-up design, as well as slight differences between the 2 countries involved in the study. Overall, the results of this analysis do not support a change in clinical practice to introduce azithromycin to prevent neonatal sepsis and mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000979648.94036.ac\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000979648.94036.ac","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症是新生儿死亡的主要原因,近年来,尽管医学进步,但脓毒症的发病率并没有下降。先前的研究表明,阿奇霉素在减少感染和败血症方面有效;特别是,最近的一项研究表明,在分娩期间服用该药,在接下来的4周内减少了革兰氏阳性细菌,同时减少了母亲和新生儿的疾病。本研究旨在评估在分娩期间给予阿奇霉素在减少新生儿败血症和死亡率方面的有效性。这项研究的主要结局是新生儿败血症或出生后28天内死亡。由于严重出生窒息、低出生体重和严重先天性畸形而确定的死亡被排除在外。次要结局包括新生儿败血症、新生儿死亡率、培养证实的败血症、发热、皮肤感染、细菌证实的皮肤感染、结膜炎、脐带感染/脐炎、疟疾、处方抗生素和住院治疗。父母的次要结局包括产后败血症、经细菌确认的产后败血症、乳腺炎、疟疾、产褥热、处方抗生素、住院和死亡率。最终的分析包括11625名父母和11783名新生儿;阿奇霉素组和安慰剂组的基线特征无显著差异。在总样本中,发生了225例新生儿败血症或死亡。两组之间的死亡率或败血症发生率相似(优势比[or], 1.06;95%置信区间[CI], 0.80-1.38;P = 0.70),以及死亡率的个体结局(OR, 1.05;95% ci, 0.70-1.60;P = 0.80)和脓毒症(OR, 1.02;95% ci, 0.74-1.40;P = 0.92)。新生儿皮肤感染发生率(P <0.001),细菌确诊的皮肤感染(P = 0.003),以及抗生素需求(P <0.001),阿奇霉素组均显著降低。阿奇霉素降低了乳腺炎(P = 0.04)和产褥热(P = 0.04)的发生率,但两组间无显著差异。这些结果表明阿奇霉素对新生儿败血症或死亡率没有影响。在某些情况下,父母和新生儿的感染都有所减少,特别是新生儿皮肤感染,但对主要结果没有影响。这些结果与先前的概念验证试验形成对比,该试验显示阿奇霉素可以减少母亲和婴儿携带的革兰氏阳性细菌的数量。最近来自不同国家的研究发现,在长期结果方面存在一些相互矛盾的结果,但不同的时间段限制了结果的比较。由于随访设计低估了感染发生率,以及参与研究的两个国家之间存在微小差异,本研究存在局限性。总的来说,该分析结果不支持改变临床实践,引入阿奇霉素来预防新生儿败血症和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Intrapartum Azithromycin vs Placebo on Neonatal Sepsis and Death A Randomized Clinical Trial
ABSTRACT Sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, and rates have not decreased in recent years despite medical advances. Azithromycin has been shown in previous research to be effective in reducing infection and sepsis; in particular, a recent study showed that administration of the drug during labor reduced gram-positive bacteria over the next 4 weeks, along with reduced disease in mothers and newborns. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin administered during labor in reducing instances of neonatal sepsis and mortality. The primary outcome for this study was neonatal sepsis or death within the first 28 days of life. Deaths that were identifiably due to severe birth asphyxia, low birth weight, and severe congenital malformations were excluded. Secondary outcomes included neonatal sepsis, neonatal mortality, culture-confirmed sepsis, fever, skin infections, bacterially confirmed skin infections, conjunctivitis, umbilical infection/omphalitis, malaria, prescribed antibiotics, and hospitalization. Secondary outcomes for parents included postpartum sepsis, bacterially confirmed postpartum sepsis, mastitis, malaria, puerperal fever, prescribed antibiotics, hospitalization, and mortality. The final analysis included 11,625 parents and 11,783 neonates; baseline characteristics between the azithromycin and placebo groups were not significantly different. Of the total sample, 225 instances of neonatal sepsis or death occurred. The incidence of either mortality or sepsis was similar between groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–1.38; P = 0.70), as well as the individual outcomes of mortality (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70–1.60; P = 0.80) and sepsis (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.74–1.40; P = 0.92). Incidence of neonatal skin infections ( P < 0.001), bacterially confirmed skin infections ( P = 0.003), and need for antibiotics ( P < 0.001) were all significantly reduced in the azithromycin group. Azithromycin reduced instances of both mastitis ( P = 0.04) and puerperal fever ( P = 0.04), but there were no other significant differences between groups. These results indicate no effect of azithromycin on neonatal sepsis or mortality. There were reductions in some instances of infection in both parents and newborns, specifically newborn skin infections, but there was no effect on the primary outcome. These results are in contrast to the previous proof-of-concept trial that showed azithromycin to reduce the amount of gram-positive bacteria carried by mothers and infants. Recent studies from different countries have found some conflicting results in longer-term outcomes, but the differing time periods limit comparison of results. This study was limited by underestimation of incidence of infections due to follow-up design, as well as slight differences between the 2 countries involved in the study. Overall, the results of this analysis do not support a change in clinical practice to introduce azithromycin to prevent neonatal sepsis and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信