人类学、人类中心主义与人类世:从人类世到人类人文主义与环境主义人类学

Q4 Social Sciences
Alan Freire De Lima, Arlete Freire De Lima
{"title":"人类学、人类中心主义与人类世:从人类世到人类人文主义与环境主义人类学","authors":"Alan Freire De Lima, Arlete Freire De Lima","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To raise theoretical reflections on the conceptions of the Anthropocene correlated to the moment we call environmentalist anthropology and the incipient theorization and conception of anthropohumanism.
 Theoretical framework: Overcoming theories purely from bio-exact sciences towards a multidisciplinary conception with input from areas of human knowledge such as anthropology and culture, sustainable development, ecology, psychoanalysis, among others.
 Method: A literature review was carried out in bibliographic databases such as Nature, Web of Science, Scielo and the Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.
 
 Results and discussions: During this research we arrived at some reflections and theorizations in which eco-anthropology, eco-development beyond the \"physical\" environment, for this purpose the contributions of theories from the human and critical sciences were addressed and were fundamental to a humanist conception of human and environmental development in an eco-sustainable way.
 Implications of the research: The implications are vast, as it is a topic with a more recent theoretical development, it led us to think, rethink and systematize the evolutionary process not only in the timeline, but also the multiple definitions and discussions about the milestones historical moments at which the Anthropocene originated and for its redefinition and/or multiple conceptions.
 Originality and value: It generated more comprehensive reflections on man's action on the biosphere, atmosphere, lithosphere and terrestrial geomorphology, as well as providing an innovative way for the more assertive development of terminologies with a new meaning and/or resignification of some terms such as ecoanthropology, environmental anthropology, anthropohumanism, among others.","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"23 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropology, Anthropocentrism and Anthropocene: From the Anthropocene Towards Anthropous Humanism and Environmentalist Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Alan Freire De Lima, Arlete Freire De Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To raise theoretical reflections on the conceptions of the Anthropocene correlated to the moment we call environmentalist anthropology and the incipient theorization and conception of anthropohumanism.
 Theoretical framework: Overcoming theories purely from bio-exact sciences towards a multidisciplinary conception with input from areas of human knowledge such as anthropology and culture, sustainable development, ecology, psychoanalysis, among others.
 Method: A literature review was carried out in bibliographic databases such as Nature, Web of Science, Scielo and the Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.
 
 Results and discussions: During this research we arrived at some reflections and theorizations in which eco-anthropology, eco-development beyond the \\\"physical\\\" environment, for this purpose the contributions of theories from the human and critical sciences were addressed and were fundamental to a humanist conception of human and environmental development in an eco-sustainable way.
 Implications of the research: The implications are vast, as it is a topic with a more recent theoretical development, it led us to think, rethink and systematize the evolutionary process not only in the timeline, but also the multiple definitions and discussions about the milestones historical moments at which the Anthropocene originated and for its redefinition and/or multiple conceptions.
 Originality and value: It generated more comprehensive reflections on man's action on the biosphere, atmosphere, lithosphere and terrestrial geomorphology, as well as providing an innovative way for the more assertive development of terminologies with a new meaning and/or resignification of some terms such as ecoanthropology, environmental anthropology, anthropohumanism, among others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"23 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出与我们称之为环境主义人类学的时刻和人类人文主义的初步理论化和概念相关的人类世概念的理论思考。理论框架:克服纯粹来自生物精确科学的理论,向多学科概念转变,并从人类知识领域(如人类学和文化,可持续发展,生态学,精神分析等)输入。 方法:在《Nature》、《Web of Science》、《Scielo》、《Revista de gesto Social e Ambiental》等文献数据库中进行文献综述。& # x0D;结果和讨论:在本研究中,我们得出了一些反思和理论,其中生态人类学,生态发展超越了“物理”环境,为此目的,人文科学和批判科学的理论贡献得到了解决,并且是以生态可持续的方式实现人类和环境发展的人文主义概念的基础。 本研究的意义:意义是巨大的,因为它是一个较新的理论发展的主题,它引导我们思考,重新思考和系统化的进化过程,不仅在时间轴上,而且对人类世起源的里程碑历史时刻的多重定义和讨论,以及对其重新定义和/或多重概念。 原创性和价值:它对人类在生物圈、大气、岩石圈和陆地地貌上的行为产生了更全面的反思,并为更自信的术语发展提供了一种创新的方式,这些术语具有新的含义和/或重新定义了一些术语,如生态人类学、环境人类学、人类人文主义等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anthropology, Anthropocentrism and Anthropocene: From the Anthropocene Towards Anthropous Humanism and Environmentalist Anthropology
Objective: To raise theoretical reflections on the conceptions of the Anthropocene correlated to the moment we call environmentalist anthropology and the incipient theorization and conception of anthropohumanism. Theoretical framework: Overcoming theories purely from bio-exact sciences towards a multidisciplinary conception with input from areas of human knowledge such as anthropology and culture, sustainable development, ecology, psychoanalysis, among others. Method: A literature review was carried out in bibliographic databases such as Nature, Web of Science, Scielo and the Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental. Results and discussions: During this research we arrived at some reflections and theorizations in which eco-anthropology, eco-development beyond the "physical" environment, for this purpose the contributions of theories from the human and critical sciences were addressed and were fundamental to a humanist conception of human and environmental development in an eco-sustainable way. Implications of the research: The implications are vast, as it is a topic with a more recent theoretical development, it led us to think, rethink and systematize the evolutionary process not only in the timeline, but also the multiple definitions and discussions about the milestones historical moments at which the Anthropocene originated and for its redefinition and/or multiple conceptions. Originality and value: It generated more comprehensive reflections on man's action on the biosphere, atmosphere, lithosphere and terrestrial geomorphology, as well as providing an innovative way for the more assertive development of terminologies with a new meaning and/or resignification of some terms such as ecoanthropology, environmental anthropology, anthropohumanism, among others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信