在登革热中滥用抗生素-抗生素耐药性的一个因素?

IF 0.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Aaja Alosious, Mariya Luvis, Roshitha Ann Shaji, Antriya Annie Tom
{"title":"在登革热中滥用抗生素-抗生素耐药性的一个因素?","authors":"Aaja Alosious, Mariya Luvis, Roshitha Ann Shaji, Antriya Annie Tom","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Dengue, a vector-borne viral infection, is a concern in the tropical and subtropical regions across the world. The rampant use of antibiotics in dengue patients in India reinforces the anticipated threat of emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Aim We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prescribing pattern of antibiotics and compare the clinical status of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2020 period, data of patients who tested positive for at least 1 of the 3 screening tests (nonstructural protein 1, immunoglobulin M, or immunoglobulin G) were collected from patient medical chart, and we assessed the clinical outcome of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Results Of 370 patients, 196 (52.97%) were managed with antibiotics and 174 (47.02%) were managed without antibiotics along with other supportive measures. A peak in the percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics was seen in 2019, 168 (85.71%) were prescribed with a single antibiotic with a majority of them, and 56.6% received third generation cephalosporins. Only 46 (23.46%) had bacterial co-infection while 150 (76.53%) had no co-infection. Thirty-five patients (70%) with dengue hemorrhagic fever were clinically managed with antibiotics compared with 50% patients in the “dengue fever” category. Only 8% of patients with mild dengue were given 2 antibiotics, whereas 13% with moderate dengue and 16% with severe dengue were prescribed with 2 antibiotics. Conclusions The increased number of prescriptions with antibiotics for a viral infection when not recommended by the guideline may lead to emergence of antibiotic resistance in hospitals as well as community.","PeriodicalId":13952,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misuse of Antibiotics in Dengue Fever—A Contributor to Antimicrobial Resistance?\",\"authors\":\"Aaja Alosious, Mariya Luvis, Roshitha Ann Shaji, Antriya Annie Tom\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Dengue, a vector-borne viral infection, is a concern in the tropical and subtropical regions across the world. The rampant use of antibiotics in dengue patients in India reinforces the anticipated threat of emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Aim We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prescribing pattern of antibiotics and compare the clinical status of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2020 period, data of patients who tested positive for at least 1 of the 3 screening tests (nonstructural protein 1, immunoglobulin M, or immunoglobulin G) were collected from patient medical chart, and we assessed the clinical outcome of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Results Of 370 patients, 196 (52.97%) were managed with antibiotics and 174 (47.02%) were managed without antibiotics along with other supportive measures. A peak in the percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics was seen in 2019, 168 (85.71%) were prescribed with a single antibiotic with a majority of them, and 56.6% received third generation cephalosporins. Only 46 (23.46%) had bacterial co-infection while 150 (76.53%) had no co-infection. Thirty-five patients (70%) with dengue hemorrhagic fever were clinically managed with antibiotics compared with 50% patients in the “dengue fever” category. Only 8% of patients with mild dengue were given 2 antibiotics, whereas 13% with moderate dengue and 16% with severe dengue were prescribed with 2 antibiotics. Conclusions The increased number of prescriptions with antibiotics for a viral infection when not recommended by the guideline may lead to emergence of antibiotic resistance in hospitals as well as community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

登革热是一种媒介传播的病毒感染,是全球热带和亚热带地区关注的问题。在印度登革热患者中滥用抗生素加剧了预期出现抗菌素耐药性的威胁。目的回顾性调查抗生素的使用情况,比较使用和不使用抗生素治疗的登革热患者的临床状况。方法在2016年1月至2020年12月期间,从患者病历中收集3种筛查试验(非结构蛋白1、免疫球蛋白M或免疫球蛋白G)中至少1种检测阳性的患者数据,评估使用和不使用抗生素治疗的登革热患者的临床结果。结果370例患者中,196例(52.97%)采用抗生素治疗,174例(47.02%)不采用抗生素治疗并采取其他支持措施。抗生素处方比例在2019年达到峰值,168例(85.71%)使用单一抗生素,其中大多数使用第三代头孢菌素,56.6%使用第三代头孢菌素。细菌共感染46例(23.46%),无细菌共感染150例(76.53%)。35例(70%)登革出血热患者在临床上使用抗生素治疗,而“登革热”类患者的这一比例为50%。只有8%的轻度登革热患者获得了2种抗生素,而13%的中度登革热患者和16%的重度登革热患者获得了2种抗生素。结论在指南未推荐的情况下使用抗生素治疗病毒感染可能导致医院和社区出现抗生素耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misuse of Antibiotics in Dengue Fever—A Contributor to Antimicrobial Resistance?
Abstract Background Dengue, a vector-borne viral infection, is a concern in the tropical and subtropical regions across the world. The rampant use of antibiotics in dengue patients in India reinforces the anticipated threat of emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Aim We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prescribing pattern of antibiotics and compare the clinical status of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2020 period, data of patients who tested positive for at least 1 of the 3 screening tests (nonstructural protein 1, immunoglobulin M, or immunoglobulin G) were collected from patient medical chart, and we assessed the clinical outcome of dengue patients treated with and without antibiotics. Results Of 370 patients, 196 (52.97%) were managed with antibiotics and 174 (47.02%) were managed without antibiotics along with other supportive measures. A peak in the percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics was seen in 2019, 168 (85.71%) were prescribed with a single antibiotic with a majority of them, and 56.6% received third generation cephalosporins. Only 46 (23.46%) had bacterial co-infection while 150 (76.53%) had no co-infection. Thirty-five patients (70%) with dengue hemorrhagic fever were clinically managed with antibiotics compared with 50% patients in the “dengue fever” category. Only 8% of patients with mild dengue were given 2 antibiotics, whereas 13% with moderate dengue and 16% with severe dengue were prescribed with 2 antibiotics. Conclusions The increased number of prescriptions with antibiotics for a viral infection when not recommended by the guideline may lead to emergence of antibiotic resistance in hospitals as well as community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Medical professionals seeking an infectious diseases journal with true clinical value need look no further than Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. Here, clinicians can get full coverage consolidated into one resource, with pertinent new developments presented in a way that makes them easy to apply to patient care. From HIV care delivery to Hepatitis C virus testing…travel and tropical medicine…and infection surveillance, prevention, and control, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice delivers the vital information needed to optimally prevent and treat infectious diseases. Indexed/abstracted in: EMBASE, SCOPUS, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信