创意经济中的女性创业精神

Q2 Social Sciences
Dunja Babović, Milica Kočović De Santo
{"title":"创意经济中的女性创业精神","authors":"Dunja Babović, Milica Kočović De Santo","doi":"10.28934/jwee23.pp109-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to bring a deeper understanding of the different types
 of entrepreneurship social, female and creative by understanding their common grounding beyond profit orientation. Starting from the literature review and then policy frameworks, our goal is to offer conceptual similarities and differences between the three types of entrepreneurship. Our central hypothesis is that all three types of entrepreneurship hold the same fundamental grounding reflected through their mission and vision –beyond profit orientation as a particular interest in entrepreneurship. What are the key differences between these types of entrepreneurship? What is their denominator? The literature review will be crossed with empirical findings from cultural and creative industries and policies on the example of design industry actors in Belgrade. Such an approach will contribute to mapping and deeper understanding of existing creative entrepreneurship, which is gender-sensitive, responsible, and share the mission and vision beyond profit orientation. 
 We came to the empirical findings from our interviews and focus group discussion. The vast majority of from examined sample of entrepreneurial organizations within the Belgrade Design District see themselves as responsible entrepreneurs. According to their daily, monthly and yearly practices, most of them fit under all three types of entrepreneurship – by contributing from the sphere of fashion and crafts (wider creative and cultural industries). On the example of Belgrade's fashion and craft design sector, we can conclude that all three types of entrepreneurship overlap - as socially responsible and sustainable entrepreneurship led by creativity, innovation and experimental work.
","PeriodicalId":36219,"journal":{"name":"Journal Women''s Entrepreneurship and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female Entrepreneurship in the Creative Economy\",\"authors\":\"Dunja Babović, Milica Kočović De Santo\",\"doi\":\"10.28934/jwee23.pp109-127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to bring a deeper understanding of the different types
 of entrepreneurship social, female and creative by understanding their common grounding beyond profit orientation. Starting from the literature review and then policy frameworks, our goal is to offer conceptual similarities and differences between the three types of entrepreneurship. Our central hypothesis is that all three types of entrepreneurship hold the same fundamental grounding reflected through their mission and vision –beyond profit orientation as a particular interest in entrepreneurship. What are the key differences between these types of entrepreneurship? What is their denominator? The literature review will be crossed with empirical findings from cultural and creative industries and policies on the example of design industry actors in Belgrade. Such an approach will contribute to mapping and deeper understanding of existing creative entrepreneurship, which is gender-sensitive, responsible, and share the mission and vision beyond profit orientation. 
 We came to the empirical findings from our interviews and focus group discussion. The vast majority of from examined sample of entrepreneurial organizations within the Belgrade Design District see themselves as responsible entrepreneurs. According to their daily, monthly and yearly practices, most of them fit under all three types of entrepreneurship – by contributing from the sphere of fashion and crafts (wider creative and cultural industries). On the example of Belgrade's fashion and craft design sector, we can conclude that all three types of entrepreneurship overlap - as socially responsible and sustainable entrepreneurship led by creativity, innovation and experimental work.
\",\"PeriodicalId\":36219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Women''s Entrepreneurship and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Women''s Entrepreneurship and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee23.pp109-127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Women''s Entrepreneurship and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee23.pp109-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在加深对不同类型的理解 企业家的社会性、女性性和创造性通过理解她们超越利润取向的共同基础。从文献综述和政策框架开始,我们的目标是提供三种创业类型之间概念上的异同。我们的中心假设是,所有三种类型的企业家都拥有相同的基本基础,这反映在他们的使命和愿景中——超越了以利润为导向的企业家精神。这些类型的创业之间的关键区别是什么?它们的分母是多少?文献综述将与文化和创意产业的实证研究结果以及贝尔格莱德设计产业行为者的政策相结合。这种方法将有助于绘制和更深入地了解现有的创意企业,这是性别敏感的,负责任的,并分享超越利润导向的使命和愿景。& # x0D;我们从访谈和焦点小组讨论中得出了实证研究结果。在贝尔格莱德设计区内,绝大多数被调查的创业组织样本都认为自己是负责任的企业家。根据他们每天、每月和每年的做法,他们中的大多数人都符合所有三种类型的企业家精神-通过在时尚和手工艺品领域(更广泛的创意和文化产业)做出贡献。以贝尔格莱德的时尚和工艺设计部门为例,我们可以得出结论,所有三种类型的创业都是重叠的——作为由创造力、创新和实验工作领导的对社会负责和可持续的创业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female Entrepreneurship in the Creative Economy
This paper aims to bring a deeper understanding of the different types of entrepreneurship social, female and creative by understanding their common grounding beyond profit orientation. Starting from the literature review and then policy frameworks, our goal is to offer conceptual similarities and differences between the three types of entrepreneurship. Our central hypothesis is that all three types of entrepreneurship hold the same fundamental grounding reflected through their mission and vision –beyond profit orientation as a particular interest in entrepreneurship. What are the key differences between these types of entrepreneurship? What is their denominator? The literature review will be crossed with empirical findings from cultural and creative industries and policies on the example of design industry actors in Belgrade. Such an approach will contribute to mapping and deeper understanding of existing creative entrepreneurship, which is gender-sensitive, responsible, and share the mission and vision beyond profit orientation. We came to the empirical findings from our interviews and focus group discussion. The vast majority of from examined sample of entrepreneurial organizations within the Belgrade Design District see themselves as responsible entrepreneurs. According to their daily, monthly and yearly practices, most of them fit under all three types of entrepreneurship – by contributing from the sphere of fashion and crafts (wider creative and cultural industries). On the example of Belgrade's fashion and craft design sector, we can conclude that all three types of entrepreneurship overlap - as socially responsible and sustainable entrepreneurship led by creativity, innovation and experimental work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信