玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗侵袭性和1型早产儿视网膜病变的比较

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kyumin Kang, Ji Hye Jang
{"title":"玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗侵袭性和1型早产儿视网膜病变的比较","authors":"Kyumin Kang, Ji Hye Jang","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the differences in treatment effects between primary intravitreal bevacizumab injections and ranibizumab injections in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive ROP.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 61 eyes from 32 premature infants who underwent primary intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for ROP. Patients with type 1 or aggressive ROP were divided into two groups: the intravitreal bevacizumab injection group and the ranibizumab injection group. We analyzed the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation, additional treatment, and the primary treatment success rate (cases in which retinal vessels formed to the periphery without additional treatment after the first injection).Results: In the type 1 ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 16 patients (30 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 6 patients (12 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. In the aggressive ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 5 patients (9 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 5 patients (10 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively. In both type 1 and aggressive ROP, there were no significant differences in the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation rate, or additional treatment rate depending on the type of anti-VEGF.Conclusions: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrated similar efficacy in type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP. However, because aggressive ROP required additional treatment more frequently regardless of the type of anti-VEGF used, close follow-up after the primary injection is essential.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections in Aggressive and Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity\",\"authors\":\"Kyumin Kang, Ji Hye Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To investigate the differences in treatment effects between primary intravitreal bevacizumab injections and ranibizumab injections in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive ROP.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 61 eyes from 32 premature infants who underwent primary intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for ROP. Patients with type 1 or aggressive ROP were divided into two groups: the intravitreal bevacizumab injection group and the ranibizumab injection group. We analyzed the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation, additional treatment, and the primary treatment success rate (cases in which retinal vessels formed to the periphery without additional treatment after the first injection).Results: In the type 1 ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 16 patients (30 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 6 patients (12 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. In the aggressive ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 5 patients (9 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 5 patients (10 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively. In both type 1 and aggressive ROP, there were no significant differences in the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation rate, or additional treatment rate depending on the type of anti-VEGF.Conclusions: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrated similar efficacy in type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP. However, because aggressive ROP required additional treatment more frequently regardless of the type of anti-VEGF used, close follow-up after the primary injection is essential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.9.784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨原发性玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与雷尼单抗治疗1型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)与侵袭性ROP的疗效差异。方法:回顾性分析32例接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射治疗ROP的早产儿61只眼的病历。1型或侵袭性ROP患者分为两组:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗组和注射雷尼单抗组。我们分析了第一次注射后病变消失的时间、再激活、额外治疗和初级治疗成功率(第一次注射后视网膜血管向外周形成而未进行额外治疗的病例)。结果:在1型ROP组中,贝伐单抗注射组16例(30眼)和雷尼单抗注射组6例(12眼)的一期治疗成功率分别为100.0%和91.7%。侵袭性ROP组,贝伐单抗注射组5例(9眼)和雷尼单抗注射组5例(10眼)的一期治疗成功率分别为55.6%和60.0%。在1型和侵袭性ROP中,根据抗vegf的类型,第一次注射后病变消失的时间、再激活率或额外治疗率均无显著差异。结论:贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗1型ROP和侵袭性ROP的疗效相似。然而,由于侵袭性ROP需要更频繁的额外治疗,无论使用哪种抗vegf,在初次注射后密切随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Injections in Aggressive and Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
Purpose: To investigate the differences in treatment effects between primary intravitreal bevacizumab injections and ranibizumab injections in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and aggressive ROP.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 61 eyes from 32 premature infants who underwent primary intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for ROP. Patients with type 1 or aggressive ROP were divided into two groups: the intravitreal bevacizumab injection group and the ranibizumab injection group. We analyzed the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation, additional treatment, and the primary treatment success rate (cases in which retinal vessels formed to the periphery without additional treatment after the first injection).Results: In the type 1 ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 16 patients (30 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 6 patients (12 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. In the aggressive ROP group, the primary treatment success rates for 5 patients (9 eyes) in the bevacizumab injection group and 5 patients (10 eyes) in the ranibizumab injection group were 55.6% and 60.0%, respectively. In both type 1 and aggressive ROP, there were no significant differences in the period until plus disease disappeared after the first injection, reactivation rate, or additional treatment rate depending on the type of anti-VEGF.Conclusions: Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrated similar efficacy in type 1 ROP and aggressive ROP. However, because aggressive ROP required additional treatment more frequently regardless of the type of anti-VEGF used, close follow-up after the primary injection is essential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信