IPO上市前和上市后的低定价:收益披露的使用是否重要?

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kavitha Ranganathan, Madhu Veeraraghavan
{"title":"IPO上市前和上市后的低定价:收益披露的使用是否重要?","authors":"Kavitha Ranganathan,&nbsp;Madhu Veeraraghavan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploiting a unique regulatory framework for IPO pricing in India, which allows us to estimate voluntary and aftermarket underpricing, we answer whether specific use of proceeds explains underpricing in the pre- and aftermarket. Our main findings are as follows. First, we document that disclosure of specific use of proceeds increases actual voluntary underpricing (i.e., offer price being lower) in the premarket and lowers aftermarket underpricing (i.e., the first-day closing price is lower). Second, the premarket effect is pronounced for firms with greater information asymmetry, whereas the aftermarket effect is pronounced for firms with higher investor sentiment. Our core findings are robust to tests that mitigate endogeneity concerns. Collectively, we show that disclosure impacts underpricing differently in the pre- and aftermarket.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-and-aftermarket IPO underpricing: Does use of proceeds disclosure matter?\",\"authors\":\"Kavitha Ranganathan,&nbsp;Madhu Veeraraghavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Exploiting a unique regulatory framework for IPO pricing in India, which allows us to estimate voluntary and aftermarket underpricing, we answer whether specific use of proceeds explains underpricing in the pre- and aftermarket. Our main findings are as follows. First, we document that disclosure of specific use of proceeds increases actual voluntary underpricing (i.e., offer price being lower) in the premarket and lowers aftermarket underpricing (i.e., the first-day closing price is lower). Second, the premarket effect is pronounced for firms with greater information asymmetry, whereas the aftermarket effect is pronounced for firms with higher investor sentiment. Our core findings are robust to tests that mitigate endogeneity concerns. Collectively, we show that disclosure impacts underpricing differently in the pre- and aftermarket.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566923000292\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566923000292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用印度独特的IPO定价监管框架,这使我们能够估计自愿和后市场的低定价,我们回答了具体使用收益是否解释了前市场和后市场的低定价。我们的主要发现如下。首先,我们证明,披露收益的具体用途增加了上市前的实际自愿低价(即出价较低),并降低了上市后的低价(即首日收盘价较低)。其次,信息不对称程度越高的企业,市场前效应越明显,而投资者情绪越高的企业,市场后效应越明显。我们的核心发现对于减轻内生性担忧的测试是稳健的。总体而言,我们表明信息披露在上市前和上市后市场对抑价的影响是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-and-aftermarket IPO underpricing: Does use of proceeds disclosure matter?

Exploiting a unique regulatory framework for IPO pricing in India, which allows us to estimate voluntary and aftermarket underpricing, we answer whether specific use of proceeds explains underpricing in the pre- and aftermarket. Our main findings are as follows. First, we document that disclosure of specific use of proceeds increases actual voluntary underpricing (i.e., offer price being lower) in the premarket and lowers aftermarket underpricing (i.e., the first-day closing price is lower). Second, the premarket effect is pronounced for firms with greater information asymmetry, whereas the aftermarket effect is pronounced for firms with higher investor sentiment. Our core findings are robust to tests that mitigate endogeneity concerns. Collectively, we show that disclosure impacts underpricing differently in the pre- and aftermarket.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信