大学生在学习中的学习能力及其与学业成绩的关系

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bernardo Gargallo-López, Gonzalo Almerich-Cerveró, Fran-J. García-García, Inmaculada López-Francés, Piedad-M.ª Sahuquillo-Mateo
{"title":"大学生在学习中的学习能力及其与学业成绩的关系","authors":"Bernardo Gargallo-López, Gonzalo Almerich-Cerveró, Fran-J. García-García, Inmaculada López-Francés, Piedad-M.ª Sahuquillo-Mateo","doi":"10.22550/rep81-3-2023-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning to learn (LtL) is a key competence that the European Commission has identified for education systems (Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for life-long learning and Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning). It is usually assumed that students will already handle it well when they start university and that their use of it will improve during their university studies, but this assumption needs testing. The aim of this article is to establish the level of management of this competence as well as possible profiles of how university students use it and their relationship to academic achievement. To this end, we worked with a sample of 1,234 students from three universities in Valencia (Spain) in different study years and study areas, applying the QELtLCUS questionnaire, which evaluates the competence. We performed descriptive analyses, cluster analysis, analyses of differences, and multiple linear regression analyses. The sample subjects displayed an acceptable level of management, albeit with low scores in some important dimensions of LtL. We found two groups with two management profiles: one with a high competence level and another with a lower competence level. The students in the first group had better scores than those in the second group, with statistically significant results. We also found differences that were not statistically significant by gender, with a hig er level of competence in women, with those relating to year and study area being larger. We believe that this research provides relevant data that may be of interest to researchers. It also includes guidance to help teachers work on this competence in university studies.","PeriodicalId":45907,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia","volume":"307 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University student profiles in the learning to learn competence and their relationship with academic achievement\",\"authors\":\"Bernardo Gargallo-López, Gonzalo Almerich-Cerveró, Fran-J. García-García, Inmaculada López-Francés, Piedad-M.ª Sahuquillo-Mateo\",\"doi\":\"10.22550/rep81-3-2023-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning to learn (LtL) is a key competence that the European Commission has identified for education systems (Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for life-long learning and Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning). It is usually assumed that students will already handle it well when they start university and that their use of it will improve during their university studies, but this assumption needs testing. The aim of this article is to establish the level of management of this competence as well as possible profiles of how university students use it and their relationship to academic achievement. To this end, we worked with a sample of 1,234 students from three universities in Valencia (Spain) in different study years and study areas, applying the QELtLCUS questionnaire, which evaluates the competence. We performed descriptive analyses, cluster analysis, analyses of differences, and multiple linear regression analyses. The sample subjects displayed an acceptable level of management, albeit with low scores in some important dimensions of LtL. We found two groups with two management profiles: one with a high competence level and another with a lower competence level. The students in the first group had better scores than those in the second group, with statistically significant results. We also found differences that were not statistically significant by gender, with a hig er level of competence in women, with those relating to year and study area being larger. We believe that this research provides relevant data that may be of interest to researchers. It also includes guidance to help teachers work on this competence in university studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia\",\"volume\":\"307 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22550/rep81-3-2023-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Pedagogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22550/rep81-3-2023-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学会学习(LtL)是欧盟委员会为教育系统确定的一项关键能力(欧洲议会和理事会2006年12月18日关于终身学习关键能力的建议和理事会2018年5月22日关于终身学习关键能力的建议)。人们通常认为,学生在上大学时就能很好地掌握英语,在大学学习期间,他们对英语的使用会有所提高,但这种假设需要检验。本文的目的是建立这种能力的管理水平,以及大学生如何使用这种能力及其与学业成绩的关系的可能概况。为此,我们对来自瓦伦西亚(西班牙)三所大学不同学习年限和学习领域的1234名学生进行了抽样调查,采用了评估能力的QELtLCUS问卷。我们进行了描述性分析、聚类分析、差异分析和多元线性回归分析。样本受试者表现出可接受的管理水平,尽管在LtL的一些重要维度上得分较低。我们发现两组管理人员有两种情况:一组能力水平高,另一组能力水平低。第一组学生的成绩优于第二组学生,结果具有统计学意义。我们还发现,性别差异在统计上并不显著,女性的能力水平更高,与年份和研究领域相关的差异更大。我们相信这项研究提供的相关数据可能会引起研究人员的兴趣。它还包括帮助教师在大学学习中培养这种能力的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
University student profiles in the learning to learn competence and their relationship with academic achievement
Learning to learn (LtL) is a key competence that the European Commission has identified for education systems (Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for life-long learning and Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning). It is usually assumed that students will already handle it well when they start university and that their use of it will improve during their university studies, but this assumption needs testing. The aim of this article is to establish the level of management of this competence as well as possible profiles of how university students use it and their relationship to academic achievement. To this end, we worked with a sample of 1,234 students from three universities in Valencia (Spain) in different study years and study areas, applying the QELtLCUS questionnaire, which evaluates the competence. We performed descriptive analyses, cluster analysis, analyses of differences, and multiple linear regression analyses. The sample subjects displayed an acceptable level of management, albeit with low scores in some important dimensions of LtL. We found two groups with two management profiles: one with a high competence level and another with a lower competence level. The students in the first group had better scores than those in the second group, with statistically significant results. We also found differences that were not statistically significant by gender, with a hig er level of competence in women, with those relating to year and study area being larger. We believe that this research provides relevant data that may be of interest to researchers. It also includes guidance to help teachers work on this competence in university studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Pedagogia
Revista Espanola De Pedagogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The revista española de pedagogía (Spanish Journal of Pedagogy or rep) is one of the oldest journals in the world dealing with pedagogical research. During the several decades it has been published, the revista española de pedagogía has always maintained the highest standards of quality and it has gained international awards. The logo of the journal is a wheel, a symbol that wants to evoke several ideas: creativity and forward motion, the wisdom eye that enters into the knowledge of reality, the sun that radiates knowledge and makes ideas shine more clearly, as well as the globe, the sign of an education that is interested in the society where it belongs. This symbol, together with some other figures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信