机器学习力场主动学习中不确定度的标定

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier
{"title":"机器学习力场主动学习中不确定度的标定","authors":"Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":" 31","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields\",\"authors\":\"Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" 31\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:FFLUX是一种机器学习力场,它使用最大期望预测误差(MEPE)主动学习算法来提高模型训练的效率。在选择下一个训练样本时,MEPE使用高斯过程的预测不确定性来平衡探索和利用。然而,高斯过程的预测不确定性不太可能在训练后立即准确或精确。我们假设在MEPE内校准不确定性量化将改善主动学习绩效。我们开发并测试了两种改进不确定性估计的方法:使用CRUDE算法对预测不确定性进行事后校准,并用Student-t过程取代高斯过程。我们研究了这些方法对单样本和批量样本主动学习的MEPE的影响。我们的研究结果表明,事后校准并不能改善使用MEPE方法的主动学习的表现。然而,我们确实发现,如果训练集足够大,学生-t过程可以优于主动学习策略和使用高斯过程的随机抽样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields
Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信