Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier
{"title":"机器学习力场主动学习中不确定度的标定","authors":"Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":" 31","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields\",\"authors\":\"Adam Thomas-Mitchell, Glenn Ivan Hawe, Paul Popelier\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" 31\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calibration of uncertainty in the active learning of machine learning force fields
Abstract FFLUX is a Machine Learning Force Field that uses the Maximum Expected Prediction Error (MEPE) active learning algorithm to improve the efficiency of model training. MEPE uses the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process to balance exploration and exploitation when selecting the next training sample. However, the predictive uncertainty of a Gaussian Process is unlikely to be accurate or precise immediately after training. We hypothesize that calibrating the uncertainty quantification within MEPE will improve active learning performance. We develop and test two methods to improve uncertainty estimates: post-hoc calibration of predictive uncertainty using the CRUDE algorithm, and replacing the Gaussian Process with a Student-t Process. We investigate the impact of these methods on MEPE for single sample and batch sample active learning. Our findings suggest that post-hoc calibration does not improve the performance of active learning using the MEPE method. However, we do find that the Student-t Process can outperform active learning strategies and random sampling using a Gaussian Process if the training set is sufficiently large.
期刊介绍:
Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.