坐着和站立时的认知任务表现:一项初步研究

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ewa Niedzielska, Monika Guszkowska, Mirosław Mikicin
{"title":"坐着和站立时的认知任务表现:一项初步研究","authors":"Ewa Niedzielska, Monika Guszkowska, Mirosław Mikicin","doi":"10.2478/bhk-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study aim : The aims of this study were to compare the effectiveness of performing tasks involving different cognitive functions in sitting versus standing positions and to assess the perceived workload. Standing or moving at work increases energy expenditure and brings health benefits while lowering the risk of diseases related to physical inactivity. The question arises whether this occurs at the expense of the effectiveness of professional activities. Material and methods : Twenty-nine physical education students (including 20 women and 9 men) volunteered to participate in the study. The participants performed four cognitive tests: two tests based on the Vienna Test System (Cognitron and ALS) and two paper-and-pencil tests (TUS and Toulouse-Pieron test). Results : There were no significant differences found between the sitting and the standing groups as regards the results of the cognitive tests. The number of omissions in the TUS test was higher in a standing position. The groups significantly differed in the perceived workload: A greater value of the summary weighted index was obtained in the sitting group. Also, the sitting students perceived their mental effort as significantly more onerous. Conclusions : The results of this pilot study suggest that the standing position does not reduce the effectiveness of activities involving cognitive functions. This is an incentive to continue randomized trials with a greater number of individuals.","PeriodicalId":44223,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive task performance in sitting and standing: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Niedzielska, Monika Guszkowska, Mirosław Mikicin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bhk-2023-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Study aim : The aims of this study were to compare the effectiveness of performing tasks involving different cognitive functions in sitting versus standing positions and to assess the perceived workload. Standing or moving at work increases energy expenditure and brings health benefits while lowering the risk of diseases related to physical inactivity. The question arises whether this occurs at the expense of the effectiveness of professional activities. Material and methods : Twenty-nine physical education students (including 20 women and 9 men) volunteered to participate in the study. The participants performed four cognitive tests: two tests based on the Vienna Test System (Cognitron and ALS) and two paper-and-pencil tests (TUS and Toulouse-Pieron test). Results : There were no significant differences found between the sitting and the standing groups as regards the results of the cognitive tests. The number of omissions in the TUS test was higher in a standing position. The groups significantly differed in the perceived workload: A greater value of the summary weighted index was obtained in the sitting group. Also, the sitting students perceived their mental effort as significantly more onerous. Conclusions : The results of this pilot study suggest that the standing position does not reduce the effectiveness of activities involving cognitive functions. This is an incentive to continue randomized trials with a greater number of individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Human Kinetics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Human Kinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2023-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2023-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要研究目的:本研究的目的是比较坐着和站着的不同认知功能任务的执行效率,并评估感知工作量。工作时站立或移动会增加能量消耗,带来健康益处,同时降低与缺乏运动相关的疾病风险。问题是,这是否以牺牲专业活动的有效性为代价。材料与方法:29名体育专业学生自愿参与研究,其中女生20人,男生9人。参与者进行了四项认知测试:两项基于维也纳测试系统(Cognitron和ALS)的测试和两项纸笔测试(TUS和Toulouse-Pieron测试)。结果:在认知测试结果方面,坐着组和站着组之间没有发现显著差异。站立姿势时,TUS测试中的遗漏次数更高。两组在感知工作量上存在显著差异:坐着组获得的综合加权指数值更高。此外,坐着的学生认为他们的脑力劳动明显更加繁重。结论:这项初步研究的结果表明,站立姿势不会降低涉及认知功能的活动的有效性。这是继续进行更多个体随机试验的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive task performance in sitting and standing: A pilot study
Abstract Study aim : The aims of this study were to compare the effectiveness of performing tasks involving different cognitive functions in sitting versus standing positions and to assess the perceived workload. Standing or moving at work increases energy expenditure and brings health benefits while lowering the risk of diseases related to physical inactivity. The question arises whether this occurs at the expense of the effectiveness of professional activities. Material and methods : Twenty-nine physical education students (including 20 women and 9 men) volunteered to participate in the study. The participants performed four cognitive tests: two tests based on the Vienna Test System (Cognitron and ALS) and two paper-and-pencil tests (TUS and Toulouse-Pieron test). Results : There were no significant differences found between the sitting and the standing groups as regards the results of the cognitive tests. The number of omissions in the TUS test was higher in a standing position. The groups significantly differed in the perceived workload: A greater value of the summary weighted index was obtained in the sitting group. Also, the sitting students perceived their mental effort as significantly more onerous. Conclusions : The results of this pilot study suggest that the standing position does not reduce the effectiveness of activities involving cognitive functions. This is an incentive to continue randomized trials with a greater number of individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Human Kinetics
Biomedical Human Kinetics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea is the health-directed quality of life. The journal thus covers many biomedical areas related to physical activity, e.g. physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, anthropology, medical issues associated with physical activities, physical and motor development, psychological and sociological issues associated with physical activities, rehabilitation, health-related sport issues and fitness, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信