转发反馈,或直接反馈外语专业教育

Irina I. Vorontsova
{"title":"转发反馈,或直接反馈外语专业教育","authors":"Irina I. Vorontsova","doi":"10.28995/2073-6398-2023-3-12-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the optics of the new education philosophy, the author proposes to consider feedback as a basic process of pedagogical interaction and moves to affirm the dualism of its focus: on the teacher and the student. The article aims to explore the conditions for ensuring effective written corrective feedback (WCF) between a teacher and a student in professional foreign language education. The method for studying the effectiveness of WCF in the locus of creating argumentative essays based on video lectures hosted by TED.com was the analysis of written assignments of the MA of the Department of Economics, the RGGU, involved in the academic work on the basis of a feedback loop, and the results of their survey. Diagnosis of WCF types in the corridor of cross-professional competencies development reveals the preference for a combination of indirect feedback and metalinguistic commenting for MA with B2-C2 language proficiency. The article presents the structural elements of peer review as the key feedback format in the teacher’s control of written work, the criteria for mutual evaluation of students’ written tasks in peer editing, and provides recommendations for producing WCF in the perspective of academic discourse socialization. The author concludes that WCF is part and parcel of the methodological strategy in the professional foreign language education process, which develops highly cognitive complex skills along with Self Skills and Soft Skills. The article alludes to the Russian films “Feedback”, 2017 and 2020, as a parallel line of artistic thought.","PeriodicalId":496950,"journal":{"name":"Вестник РГГУ. Психология, педагогика, образование","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FORWARD TO FEEDBACK, OR DIRECTING FEEDBACK IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION\",\"authors\":\"Irina I. Vorontsova\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6398-2023-3-12-27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the optics of the new education philosophy, the author proposes to consider feedback as a basic process of pedagogical interaction and moves to affirm the dualism of its focus: on the teacher and the student. The article aims to explore the conditions for ensuring effective written corrective feedback (WCF) between a teacher and a student in professional foreign language education. The method for studying the effectiveness of WCF in the locus of creating argumentative essays based on video lectures hosted by TED.com was the analysis of written assignments of the MA of the Department of Economics, the RGGU, involved in the academic work on the basis of a feedback loop, and the results of their survey. Diagnosis of WCF types in the corridor of cross-professional competencies development reveals the preference for a combination of indirect feedback and metalinguistic commenting for MA with B2-C2 language proficiency. The article presents the structural elements of peer review as the key feedback format in the teacher’s control of written work, the criteria for mutual evaluation of students’ written tasks in peer editing, and provides recommendations for producing WCF in the perspective of academic discourse socialization. The author concludes that WCF is part and parcel of the methodological strategy in the professional foreign language education process, which develops highly cognitive complex skills along with Self Skills and Soft Skills. The article alludes to the Russian films “Feedback”, 2017 and 2020, as a parallel line of artistic thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Вестник РГГУ. Психология, педагогика, образование\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Вестник РГГУ. Психология, педагогика, образование\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2023-3-12-27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник РГГУ. Психология, педагогика, образование","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2023-3-12-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新教育哲学的视野中,作者提出将反馈视为教学互动的一个基本过程,并试图肯定其关注的二元性:教师和学生。本文旨在探讨在专业外语教育中,师生之间有效的书面纠错反馈的条件。研究WCF在基于TED.com主持的视频讲座的议论文创作中的有效性的方法是对RGGU经济学系硕士的书面作业进行分析,他们参与了基于反馈回路的学术工作,以及他们的调查结果。跨专业能力发展走廊中WCF类型的诊断显示,具有B2-C2语言能力的MA倾向于间接反馈和元语言评论的结合。本文提出了同行评议作为教师对书面作业控制的关键反馈形式的结构要素、同行编辑中学生书面任务相互评价的标准,并从学术话语社会化的角度提出了WCF的产生建议。作者认为,WCF是专业外语教育过程中方法论策略的重要组成部分,它在培养自我技能和软技能的同时,也培养了高度认知的复杂技能。本文以俄罗斯电影《反馈》(2017)和《反馈》(2020)作为艺术思想的平行线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FORWARD TO FEEDBACK, OR DIRECTING FEEDBACK IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
In the optics of the new education philosophy, the author proposes to consider feedback as a basic process of pedagogical interaction and moves to affirm the dualism of its focus: on the teacher and the student. The article aims to explore the conditions for ensuring effective written corrective feedback (WCF) between a teacher and a student in professional foreign language education. The method for studying the effectiveness of WCF in the locus of creating argumentative essays based on video lectures hosted by TED.com was the analysis of written assignments of the MA of the Department of Economics, the RGGU, involved in the academic work on the basis of a feedback loop, and the results of their survey. Diagnosis of WCF types in the corridor of cross-professional competencies development reveals the preference for a combination of indirect feedback and metalinguistic commenting for MA with B2-C2 language proficiency. The article presents the structural elements of peer review as the key feedback format in the teacher’s control of written work, the criteria for mutual evaluation of students’ written tasks in peer editing, and provides recommendations for producing WCF in the perspective of academic discourse socialization. The author concludes that WCF is part and parcel of the methodological strategy in the professional foreign language education process, which develops highly cognitive complex skills along with Self Skills and Soft Skills. The article alludes to the Russian films “Feedback”, 2017 and 2020, as a parallel line of artistic thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信