穆斯塔赫强加的结果——从穆斯塔赫的角度看塔拉克语

Nuril Hidayati
{"title":"穆斯塔赫强加的结果——从穆斯塔赫的角度看塔拉克语","authors":"Nuril Hidayati","doi":"10.30983/gic.v1i1.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Marriage Law in Indonesia stipulates that divorce can only be done before a court hearing, therefore the validity of divorce outside the court is not recognized. To the husband who submits a divorce application, besides allowing the husband to declare divorce in front of the court, the panel of judges can also burden the husband with paying a number of obligations including in the form of mut'ah. In common practice, mut'ah is usually paid after the trial of the divorce pledge is completed, but since the issuance of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 which stipulates that judges can include in a decision that the obligation of mut'ah must be paid before the pledge of divorce, many judges then carry out mandate of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 on the grounds of providing legal certainty for women's rights. However, this actually becomes an obstacle for the husband to carry out the divorce vow if the husband is unable to make payments. However, the results of the study found that the non-implementation of the divorce pledge was due to the inability of the husband to pay the mut'ah burden that was required to be paid before the divorce pledge, so if viewed from the perspective of mashlahah mursalah it does not actually make this judge's decision unfair, as well as an order to pay mut'ah before the pledge of divorce being pronounced also does not make the decision unfair. In this case the judge has considered many things, not only consideration of the husband's rights but consideration of the welfare of the wife as well.","PeriodicalId":483333,"journal":{"name":"GIC Proceeding","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Icrar of Talak as A Result of Mut'ah Imposition Perspective of Mashlahah Mursalah\",\"authors\":\"Nuril Hidayati\",\"doi\":\"10.30983/gic.v1i1.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Marriage Law in Indonesia stipulates that divorce can only be done before a court hearing, therefore the validity of divorce outside the court is not recognized. To the husband who submits a divorce application, besides allowing the husband to declare divorce in front of the court, the panel of judges can also burden the husband with paying a number of obligations including in the form of mut'ah. In common practice, mut'ah is usually paid after the trial of the divorce pledge is completed, but since the issuance of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 which stipulates that judges can include in a decision that the obligation of mut'ah must be paid before the pledge of divorce, many judges then carry out mandate of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 on the grounds of providing legal certainty for women's rights. However, this actually becomes an obstacle for the husband to carry out the divorce vow if the husband is unable to make payments. However, the results of the study found that the non-implementation of the divorce pledge was due to the inability of the husband to pay the mut'ah burden that was required to be paid before the divorce pledge, so if viewed from the perspective of mashlahah mursalah it does not actually make this judge's decision unfair, as well as an order to pay mut'ah before the pledge of divorce being pronounced also does not make the decision unfair. In this case the judge has considered many things, not only consideration of the husband's rights but consideration of the welfare of the wife as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GIC Proceeding\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GIC Proceeding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GIC Proceeding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚的《婚姻法》规定,离婚只能在法庭审理前进行,因此法院外离婚的有效性不被承认。对于提出离婚申请的丈夫,除了允许丈夫在法庭上宣布离婚外,法官小组还可以让丈夫承担一些义务,包括以mut'ah的形式。在一般做法中,穆特拉通常在离婚质押审判完成后支付,但自2017年第1号SEMA颁布以来,法官可以在判决中包括必须在离婚质押之前支付穆特拉的义务,许多法官随后以为妇女权利提供法律确定性为理由执行2017年第1号SEMA的任务。然而,如果丈夫无力支付,这实际上成为丈夫履行离婚誓言的障碍。然而,本研究的结果发现,未履行离婚质押是由于丈夫无力支付离婚质押前需要支付的穆特拉负担,因此,如果从mashlahah mursalah的角度来看,实际上并没有使该法官的判决不公平,在宣布离婚质押前下令支付穆特拉也没有使该判决不公平。在这个案件中,法官考虑了很多事情,不仅考虑了丈夫的权利,也考虑了妻子的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Icrar of Talak as A Result of Mut'ah Imposition Perspective of Mashlahah Mursalah
The Marriage Law in Indonesia stipulates that divorce can only be done before a court hearing, therefore the validity of divorce outside the court is not recognized. To the husband who submits a divorce application, besides allowing the husband to declare divorce in front of the court, the panel of judges can also burden the husband with paying a number of obligations including in the form of mut'ah. In common practice, mut'ah is usually paid after the trial of the divorce pledge is completed, but since the issuance of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 which stipulates that judges can include in a decision that the obligation of mut'ah must be paid before the pledge of divorce, many judges then carry out mandate of SEMA Number 1 of 2017 on the grounds of providing legal certainty for women's rights. However, this actually becomes an obstacle for the husband to carry out the divorce vow if the husband is unable to make payments. However, the results of the study found that the non-implementation of the divorce pledge was due to the inability of the husband to pay the mut'ah burden that was required to be paid before the divorce pledge, so if viewed from the perspective of mashlahah mursalah it does not actually make this judge's decision unfair, as well as an order to pay mut'ah before the pledge of divorce being pronounced also does not make the decision unfair. In this case the judge has considered many things, not only consideration of the husband's rights but consideration of the welfare of the wife as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信