临床决策理论

Kanat Yakubovich
{"title":"临床决策理论","authors":"Kanat Yakubovich","doi":"10.59652/aim.v1i2.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical decision-making is a cornerstone of healthcare, influencing patient diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. This article explores the multifaceted nature of clinical decision-making, emphasizing its significance, challenges, and implications for modern healthcare. It delves into three primary decision-making theories: the rationalist approach, which prioritizes evidence-based decision-making; the phenomenological approach, focusing on intuition and experience; and the hypothetic-deductive approach, which seeks a balance between the previous two. These theories, while offering valuable perspectives, must be applied with consideration of the complex factors that influence decision-making, including competence, confidence, organizational support, and the clinical environment. Ultimately, clinical decision-making is both an art and a science, demanding a nuanced understanding to ensure patient-centered care and improved healthcare outcomes.","PeriodicalId":472536,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Innovation in Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical decision-making theories\",\"authors\":\"Kanat Yakubovich\",\"doi\":\"10.59652/aim.v1i2.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical decision-making is a cornerstone of healthcare, influencing patient diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. This article explores the multifaceted nature of clinical decision-making, emphasizing its significance, challenges, and implications for modern healthcare. It delves into three primary decision-making theories: the rationalist approach, which prioritizes evidence-based decision-making; the phenomenological approach, focusing on intuition and experience; and the hypothetic-deductive approach, which seeks a balance between the previous two. These theories, while offering valuable perspectives, must be applied with consideration of the complex factors that influence decision-making, including competence, confidence, organizational support, and the clinical environment. Ultimately, clinical decision-making is both an art and a science, demanding a nuanced understanding to ensure patient-centered care and improved healthcare outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":472536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Innovation in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Innovation in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59652/aim.v1i2.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Innovation in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59652/aim.v1i2.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床决策是医疗保健的基石,影响着患者的诊断、治疗和持续护理。本文探讨临床决策的多面性,强调其对现代医疗保健的重要性、挑战和影响。研究了三种主要的决策理论:理性主义方法,优先考虑循证决策;现象学方法,关注直觉和经验;假设-演绎方法,在前两者之间寻求平衡。这些理论虽然提供了有价值的观点,但在应用时必须考虑到影响决策的复杂因素,包括能力、信心、组织支持和临床环境。最终,临床决策既是一门艺术也是一门科学,需要细致入微的理解,以确保以患者为中心的护理和改善的医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical decision-making theories
Clinical decision-making is a cornerstone of healthcare, influencing patient diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. This article explores the multifaceted nature of clinical decision-making, emphasizing its significance, challenges, and implications for modern healthcare. It delves into three primary decision-making theories: the rationalist approach, which prioritizes evidence-based decision-making; the phenomenological approach, focusing on intuition and experience; and the hypothetic-deductive approach, which seeks a balance between the previous two. These theories, while offering valuable perspectives, must be applied with consideration of the complex factors that influence decision-making, including competence, confidence, organizational support, and the clinical environment. Ultimately, clinical decision-making is both an art and a science, demanding a nuanced understanding to ensure patient-centered care and improved healthcare outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信