{"title":"行走时膝关节屈曲与双侧痉挛性脑瘫患儿膝关节挛缩的比较","authors":"Cecilia Lidbeck, Bartonek Åsa","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexed knee is a multidimensional kinematic walking pattern in children with bilateral spastic CP that has been described to develop as gait matures, particularly at higher GMFCS levels (1). One cause might be limited knee extension that have been described to lead to significant disability with a flexed knee gait posture during walking (2). The aim of this study was to compare knee position during walking with passive knee extension in an unloaded body position, and with respect to functional mobility during walking. Gait in 30 children with bilateral spastic CP (13 females) median [min, max] age 11.3 [7.6, 17.1] years and 22 typical developing (TD) children (11 females) median [min-max] age 8.9 [6.5-16.9], was assessed with 3D-motion analysis (Vicon MX40®). Joint contractures in ankle, knee and hip, defined from a neutral joint position, were assessed through goniometric measurement of passive hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion with extended knee in supine position. Orthopaedic lower limb surgeries were documented. Functional mobility was measured with the time up and go test (TUG). Non-parametric statistics were used (p<0.05). Knee contractures were greater at GMFCS III than at GMFCS I and in the TD group (p=0.046 and p= 0.002). During walking, knee angle at initial contact (KneeAngleIC) was greater than peak knee extension in stance (MinKneeFlexSt) in the TD group and at GMFCS I, II, and III (p=0.008, p=0.043, 0.005, and p=0.002) respectively. MinKneeFlexSt exceeded maximum passive knee extension at GMFCS levels II (p=0.004), and III (p=0.002). Both KneeAngleIC and MinKneeFlexSt were greater at GMFCS II and III, than at GMFCS I and the TD group (Fig. 1). TUG took longer for GMFCS II and GMFCS III compared to TD (p<.001 and p<.001) and GMFCS I (p= 0.001 and p<0.001), and longer for GMFCS III compared to GMFCS II (p<0.001). Fig. 1 Light bars represent KneeAngleIC and dark bars MinKneeFlexSt. (+) indicates knee flexion, brackets above the boxes: differences at KneeAngleIC, and below: differences at MinKneeFlexSt.Download : Download high-res image (58KB)Download : Download full-size image This study found that knee flexion in stance was significantly greater than knee contractures at GMFCS levels II and III with no difference in occurrence of orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, walking ability took longer at GMFCS level III compared to at level II at similar knee flexion contracture. The discrepancy in knee position in weight-bearing versus passive knee extension in the unloaded position at GMFCS II and III, and the large difference in TUG between children at GMFCS level III and those in the other groups, are likely explained by the effort to overcome motor disorders such as spasticity, however, may also be explained by the commonly occurring sensorimotor disorders (4).","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knee flexion while walking versus knee contractures in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Lidbeck, Bartonek Åsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flexed knee is a multidimensional kinematic walking pattern in children with bilateral spastic CP that has been described to develop as gait matures, particularly at higher GMFCS levels (1). One cause might be limited knee extension that have been described to lead to significant disability with a flexed knee gait posture during walking (2). The aim of this study was to compare knee position during walking with passive knee extension in an unloaded body position, and with respect to functional mobility during walking. Gait in 30 children with bilateral spastic CP (13 females) median [min, max] age 11.3 [7.6, 17.1] years and 22 typical developing (TD) children (11 females) median [min-max] age 8.9 [6.5-16.9], was assessed with 3D-motion analysis (Vicon MX40®). Joint contractures in ankle, knee and hip, defined from a neutral joint position, were assessed through goniometric measurement of passive hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion with extended knee in supine position. Orthopaedic lower limb surgeries were documented. Functional mobility was measured with the time up and go test (TUG). Non-parametric statistics were used (p<0.05). Knee contractures were greater at GMFCS III than at GMFCS I and in the TD group (p=0.046 and p= 0.002). During walking, knee angle at initial contact (KneeAngleIC) was greater than peak knee extension in stance (MinKneeFlexSt) in the TD group and at GMFCS I, II, and III (p=0.008, p=0.043, 0.005, and p=0.002) respectively. MinKneeFlexSt exceeded maximum passive knee extension at GMFCS levels II (p=0.004), and III (p=0.002). Both KneeAngleIC and MinKneeFlexSt were greater at GMFCS II and III, than at GMFCS I and the TD group (Fig. 1). TUG took longer for GMFCS II and GMFCS III compared to TD (p<.001 and p<.001) and GMFCS I (p= 0.001 and p<0.001), and longer for GMFCS III compared to GMFCS II (p<0.001). Fig. 1 Light bars represent KneeAngleIC and dark bars MinKneeFlexSt. (+) indicates knee flexion, brackets above the boxes: differences at KneeAngleIC, and below: differences at MinKneeFlexSt.Download : Download high-res image (58KB)Download : Download full-size image This study found that knee flexion in stance was significantly greater than knee contractures at GMFCS levels II and III with no difference in occurrence of orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, walking ability took longer at GMFCS level III compared to at level II at similar knee flexion contracture. The discrepancy in knee position in weight-bearing versus passive knee extension in the unloaded position at GMFCS II and III, and the large difference in TUG between children at GMFCS level III and those in the other groups, are likely explained by the effort to overcome motor disorders such as spasticity, however, may also be explained by the commonly occurring sensorimotor disorders (4).\",\"PeriodicalId\":94018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
膝关节屈曲是双侧痉挛性CP患儿的一种多维运动步行模式,随着步态的成熟而发展,特别是在GMFCS水平较高时(1)。其中一个原因可能是膝关节伸展受限,这被描述为导致行走时膝关节屈曲步态姿势的严重残疾(2)。本研究的目的是比较行走时膝关节位置与无负荷体位时被动膝关节伸展。以及行走时的功能性活动能力。采用3d运动分析(Vicon MX40®)对30名双侧痉挛性CP患儿(13名女性)的步态进行评估,其中中位[最小,最大]年龄为11.3[7.6,17.1]岁,22名典型发育(TD)患儿(11名女性)的中位[最小,最大]年龄为8.9[6.5-16.9]岁。踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的关节挛缩,从关节的中性位置定义,通过测量被动髋关节伸展、膝关节伸展和仰卧位时踝关节背屈的角度来评估。记录了骨科下肢手术。功能活动度采用起走时间(time up and go test, TUG)测试。采用非参数统计(p<0.05)。GMFCS III组的膝关节收缩大于GMFCS I组和TD组(p=0.046和p= 0.002)。行走时,TD组和GMFCS I、II、III组初始接触膝关节角度(knee angleic)分别大于站立时膝关节伸展峰值(MinKneeFlexSt) (p=0.008、p=0.043、0.005和p=0.002)。MinKneeFlexSt超过GMFCS II级(p=0.004)和III级(p=0.002)的最大被动膝关节伸展。GMFCS II组和GMFCS III组的kneangleic和MinKneeFlexSt均高于GMFCS I组和TD组(图1)。与TD组相比,GMFCS II组和GMFCS III组的TUG所需时间更长(p<。(p<0.001)和GMFCS I (p= 0.001和p<0.001), GMFCS III比GMFCS II的治疗时间更长(p<0.001)。图1亮条代表kneangleic,暗条代表MinKneeFlexSt。(+)表示膝关节屈曲,方框上方括号为膝关节角的差异,方框下方括号为膝关节角的差异。本研究发现,GMFCS II级和III级患者站立时膝关节屈曲明显大于膝关节挛缩,在骨科手术发生率上无差异。此外,在类似膝关节屈曲挛缩的情况下,GMFCS III级患者的行走能力比II级患者需要更长的时间。GMFCS II和III级负重时膝关节位置与无负重时被动膝关节伸展位置的差异,以及GMFCS III级儿童与其他组儿童之间TUG的巨大差异,可能是由于克服痉挛等运动障碍的努力所致,然而,也可能是由于常见的感觉运动障碍所致(4)。
Knee flexion while walking versus knee contractures in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy
Flexed knee is a multidimensional kinematic walking pattern in children with bilateral spastic CP that has been described to develop as gait matures, particularly at higher GMFCS levels (1). One cause might be limited knee extension that have been described to lead to significant disability with a flexed knee gait posture during walking (2). The aim of this study was to compare knee position during walking with passive knee extension in an unloaded body position, and with respect to functional mobility during walking. Gait in 30 children with bilateral spastic CP (13 females) median [min, max] age 11.3 [7.6, 17.1] years and 22 typical developing (TD) children (11 females) median [min-max] age 8.9 [6.5-16.9], was assessed with 3D-motion analysis (Vicon MX40®). Joint contractures in ankle, knee and hip, defined from a neutral joint position, were assessed through goniometric measurement of passive hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion with extended knee in supine position. Orthopaedic lower limb surgeries were documented. Functional mobility was measured with the time up and go test (TUG). Non-parametric statistics were used (p<0.05). Knee contractures were greater at GMFCS III than at GMFCS I and in the TD group (p=0.046 and p= 0.002). During walking, knee angle at initial contact (KneeAngleIC) was greater than peak knee extension in stance (MinKneeFlexSt) in the TD group and at GMFCS I, II, and III (p=0.008, p=0.043, 0.005, and p=0.002) respectively. MinKneeFlexSt exceeded maximum passive knee extension at GMFCS levels II (p=0.004), and III (p=0.002). Both KneeAngleIC and MinKneeFlexSt were greater at GMFCS II and III, than at GMFCS I and the TD group (Fig. 1). TUG took longer for GMFCS II and GMFCS III compared to TD (p<.001 and p<.001) and GMFCS I (p= 0.001 and p<0.001), and longer for GMFCS III compared to GMFCS II (p<0.001). Fig. 1 Light bars represent KneeAngleIC and dark bars MinKneeFlexSt. (+) indicates knee flexion, brackets above the boxes: differences at KneeAngleIC, and below: differences at MinKneeFlexSt.Download : Download high-res image (58KB)Download : Download full-size image This study found that knee flexion in stance was significantly greater than knee contractures at GMFCS levels II and III with no difference in occurrence of orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, walking ability took longer at GMFCS level III compared to at level II at similar knee flexion contracture. The discrepancy in knee position in weight-bearing versus passive knee extension in the unloaded position at GMFCS II and III, and the large difference in TUG between children at GMFCS level III and those in the other groups, are likely explained by the effort to overcome motor disorders such as spasticity, however, may also be explained by the commonly occurring sensorimotor disorders (4).