药品知识产权补充保护

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
A.O. Kodynets, O.F. Doroshenko, I.P. Volynets, G.K. Dorozhko, V.O. Petrenko, V.V. Belitsky
{"title":"药品知识产权补充保护","authors":"A.O. Kodynets, O.F. Doroshenko, I.P. Volynets, G.K. Dorozhko, V.O. Petrenko, V.V. Belitsky","doi":"10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issue of extending the legal protection of intellectual property rights for medicines. The research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the problems related to the implementation of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in national legislation and possible solutions. The study also seeks to draw conclusions and make proposals for improving the regulatory framework for the SPCs of medicines. The work utilizes general scientific and specialized methods of scientific cognition, including dialectical, formal-logical, systemic-structural, comparative legal, as well as modeling, analysis, and synthesis methods, which collectively contributed to the organization, planning, and conduct of the research. The study is based on scientific publications from databases and search systems (PubMed, JAMA, Scopus, Springer, BMC, Oxford Academic), international and national regulatory acts, statistical studies by international organizations (Precedence Research), patents for inventions related to medicines, recommendations by national government bodies, as well as prescriptions and guidelines from international and national experts. Considering the analysis of statistical data on the development and implementation of medicines, it has been determined that original biological medicines are a major factor in the rising prices of treating conditions such as diabetes, oncological diseases, and others. Examples of patents for medicines owned by global pharmaceutical companies (Gilead, Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh, etc.) that have ensured their commercial success and competitive advantages are examined. It has been established that patent protection provides the right holder with the opportunity to maintain a monopoly in the market, thereby compensating for the time spent on the development and research of original medicinal products. Legislative approaches to regulating relationships concerning the supplementary protection of inventions related to medicines in the form of SPCs in Ukraine and the EU are identified. The exclusivity periods for regulatory data protection for medicines in the EU are outlined. Based on the conducted research, it is concluded that the application of the SPC mechanism is a tool to achieve a balance between the protection of intellectual property rights and access to original medicines. Timely entry of generics and biosimilars to the market contributes to reducing market prices but negatively impacts the profitability of manufacturers of original medicines. Attention is drawn to problematic aspects of the legislative implementation of the SPC mechanism in Ukraine, which leads to incorrect interpretation and implementation of relevant provisions and necessitates updating. In light of the aforementioned, there is an urgent need in Ukraine to implement, update, and improve the legislative mechanism for regulating SPCs.","PeriodicalId":41059,"journal":{"name":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplementary protection of intellectual property rights for medicines\",\"authors\":\"A.O. Kodynets, O.F. Doroshenko, I.P. Volynets, G.K. Dorozhko, V.O. Petrenko, V.V. Belitsky\",\"doi\":\"10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the issue of extending the legal protection of intellectual property rights for medicines. The research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the problems related to the implementation of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in national legislation and possible solutions. The study also seeks to draw conclusions and make proposals for improving the regulatory framework for the SPCs of medicines. The work utilizes general scientific and specialized methods of scientific cognition, including dialectical, formal-logical, systemic-structural, comparative legal, as well as modeling, analysis, and synthesis methods, which collectively contributed to the organization, planning, and conduct of the research. The study is based on scientific publications from databases and search systems (PubMed, JAMA, Scopus, Springer, BMC, Oxford Academic), international and national regulatory acts, statistical studies by international organizations (Precedence Research), patents for inventions related to medicines, recommendations by national government bodies, as well as prescriptions and guidelines from international and national experts. Considering the analysis of statistical data on the development and implementation of medicines, it has been determined that original biological medicines are a major factor in the rising prices of treating conditions such as diabetes, oncological diseases, and others. Examples of patents for medicines owned by global pharmaceutical companies (Gilead, Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh, etc.) that have ensured their commercial success and competitive advantages are examined. It has been established that patent protection provides the right holder with the opportunity to maintain a monopoly in the market, thereby compensating for the time spent on the development and research of original medicinal products. Legislative approaches to regulating relationships concerning the supplementary protection of inventions related to medicines in the form of SPCs in Ukraine and the EU are identified. The exclusivity periods for regulatory data protection for medicines in the EU are outlined. Based on the conducted research, it is concluded that the application of the SPC mechanism is a tool to achieve a balance between the protection of intellectual property rights and access to original medicines. Timely entry of generics and biosimilars to the market contributes to reducing market prices but negatively impacts the profitability of manufacturers of original medicines. Attention is drawn to problematic aspects of the legislative implementation of the SPC mechanism in Ukraine, which leads to incorrect interpretation and implementation of relevant provisions and necessitates updating. In light of the aforementioned, there is an urgent need in Ukraine to implement, update, and improve the legislative mechanism for regulating SPCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了扩大药品知识产权法律保护的问题。本研究旨在全面概述与国家立法中实施补充保护证书(spc)有关的问题和可能的解决方案。该研究还试图得出结论,并提出建议,以改进药品的特别说明文件的管理框架。这项工作运用了科学认知的一般科学方法和专门方法,包括辩证方法、形式逻辑方法、系统结构方法、比较法学方法以及建模、分析和综合方法,这些方法共同为研究的组织、规划和实施做出了贡献。这项研究的基础是来自数据库和搜索系统(PubMed、JAMA、Scopus、Springer、BMC、Oxford Academic)的科学出版物、国际和国家监管法案、国际组织的统计研究(Precedence Research)、与药物相关的发明专利、国家政府机构的建议,以及国际和国家专家的处方和指南。考虑到对药物开发和实施的统计数据的分析,已经确定,原始生物药物是糖尿病、肿瘤疾病和其他疾病治疗价格上涨的一个主要因素。全球制药公司(吉利德、拜耳知识产权有限公司等)拥有的药品专利的例子确保了它们的商业成功和竞争优势。已经确定的是,专利保护为权利人提供了在市场上保持垄断的机会,从而补偿了在原始药品的开发和研究上花费的时间。确定了在乌克兰和欧盟以特别方案书的形式规范补充保护与药品有关的发明的关系的立法途径。概述了欧盟药品监管数据保护的独占期。基于所进行的研究,结论是SPC机制的应用是实现知识产权保护与原研药可及性之间平衡的工具。仿制药和生物仿制药及时进入市场有助于降低市场价格,但对原研药制造商的盈利能力产生负面影响。提请注意乌克兰最高人民法院机制立法实施中存在的问题,这些问题导致有关条款的不正确解释和执行,需要更新。鉴于上述情况,乌克兰迫切需要实施、更新和改进规范特别利益相关者的立法机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supplementary protection of intellectual property rights for medicines
The article discusses the issue of extending the legal protection of intellectual property rights for medicines. The research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the problems related to the implementation of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in national legislation and possible solutions. The study also seeks to draw conclusions and make proposals for improving the regulatory framework for the SPCs of medicines. The work utilizes general scientific and specialized methods of scientific cognition, including dialectical, formal-logical, systemic-structural, comparative legal, as well as modeling, analysis, and synthesis methods, which collectively contributed to the organization, planning, and conduct of the research. The study is based on scientific publications from databases and search systems (PubMed, JAMA, Scopus, Springer, BMC, Oxford Academic), international and national regulatory acts, statistical studies by international organizations (Precedence Research), patents for inventions related to medicines, recommendations by national government bodies, as well as prescriptions and guidelines from international and national experts. Considering the analysis of statistical data on the development and implementation of medicines, it has been determined that original biological medicines are a major factor in the rising prices of treating conditions such as diabetes, oncological diseases, and others. Examples of patents for medicines owned by global pharmaceutical companies (Gilead, Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh, etc.) that have ensured their commercial success and competitive advantages are examined. It has been established that patent protection provides the right holder with the opportunity to maintain a monopoly in the market, thereby compensating for the time spent on the development and research of original medicinal products. Legislative approaches to regulating relationships concerning the supplementary protection of inventions related to medicines in the form of SPCs in Ukraine and the EU are identified. The exclusivity periods for regulatory data protection for medicines in the EU are outlined. Based on the conducted research, it is concluded that the application of the SPC mechanism is a tool to achieve a balance between the protection of intellectual property rights and access to original medicines. Timely entry of generics and biosimilars to the market contributes to reducing market prices but negatively impacts the profitability of manufacturers of original medicines. Attention is drawn to problematic aspects of the legislative implementation of the SPC mechanism in Ukraine, which leads to incorrect interpretation and implementation of relevant provisions and necessitates updating. In light of the aforementioned, there is an urgent need in Ukraine to implement, update, and improve the legislative mechanism for regulating SPCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信