医学生最后一年学习风格的评估:私立和公立医学院的比较

Esculapio Pub Date : 2023-05-13 DOI:10.51273/esc23.2519114
Prof Naila Asad Naila, Nighat Nadeem
{"title":"医学生最后一年学习风格的评估:私立和公立医学院的比较","authors":"Prof Naila Asad Naila, Nighat Nadeem","doi":"10.51273/esc23.2519114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to make a comparison of preferred learning style of final year MBBS medical students of a private medical college with that of Government sector institution. Method: Participants of this observational study were final year students of Services Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore (SIMS) and Lahore Medical and Dental College (LMDC) Pakistan. Fifty Final year students from each college filled the Vark Questionnaire. They were assessed according to their favorite method of learning and were classified as kinesthetic, visual, auditory, or read/write. Comparison of VARK scores between colleges was done by Independent Sample T-Test. Results: There was no significant difference in preference of learning styles among students of both medical colleges. Majority students of both colleges preferred Unimodal style (LMDC-78% vs SIMS-74%). Multimodal style was seen in the rest of students. Read/writing was common among the students of both colleges (20%). Kinesthetic style was preferred by 34% of students of private vs 20% from Government institution. Conclusion: Teaching should involve all sensory modality so that all types of students can actively participate in learning session.","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Learning Styles in Final Year Medical Students: Comparison of Private and Government Medical College\",\"authors\":\"Prof Naila Asad Naila, Nighat Nadeem\",\"doi\":\"10.51273/esc23.2519114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: to make a comparison of preferred learning style of final year MBBS medical students of a private medical college with that of Government sector institution. Method: Participants of this observational study were final year students of Services Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore (SIMS) and Lahore Medical and Dental College (LMDC) Pakistan. Fifty Final year students from each college filled the Vark Questionnaire. They were assessed according to their favorite method of learning and were classified as kinesthetic, visual, auditory, or read/write. Comparison of VARK scores between colleges was done by Independent Sample T-Test. Results: There was no significant difference in preference of learning styles among students of both medical colleges. Majority students of both colleges preferred Unimodal style (LMDC-78% vs SIMS-74%). Multimodal style was seen in the rest of students. Read/writing was common among the students of both colleges (20%). Kinesthetic style was preferred by 34% of students of private vs 20% from Government institution. Conclusion: Teaching should involve all sensory modality so that all types of students can actively participate in learning session.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esculapio\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esculapio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.2519114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.2519114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较私立医学院校MBBS毕业生与公立医学院校MBBS毕业生的学习方式偏好。方法:本观察性研究的参与者是巴基斯坦拉合尔医学科学服务学院(SIMS)和拉合尔医学和牙科学院(LMDC)的最后一年级学生。每所大学的50名大四学生填写了瓦尔克问卷。根据他们最喜欢的学习方法对他们进行评估,并将他们分为动觉、视觉、听觉或读/写。各院校VARK成绩比较采用独立样本t检验。结果:两校学生对学习方式的偏好差异无统计学意义。两所学院的大多数学生都更喜欢单模式风格(LMDC-78% vs sim -74%)。其余学生呈现多模态风格。读/写在两所学院的学生中都很普遍(20%)。34%的私立学校学生和20%的公立学校学生更喜欢动觉风格。结论:教学应涉及所有感官方式,使各类学生都能积极参与学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Learning Styles in Final Year Medical Students: Comparison of Private and Government Medical College
Objective: to make a comparison of preferred learning style of final year MBBS medical students of a private medical college with that of Government sector institution. Method: Participants of this observational study were final year students of Services Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore (SIMS) and Lahore Medical and Dental College (LMDC) Pakistan. Fifty Final year students from each college filled the Vark Questionnaire. They were assessed according to their favorite method of learning and were classified as kinesthetic, visual, auditory, or read/write. Comparison of VARK scores between colleges was done by Independent Sample T-Test. Results: There was no significant difference in preference of learning styles among students of both medical colleges. Majority students of both colleges preferred Unimodal style (LMDC-78% vs SIMS-74%). Multimodal style was seen in the rest of students. Read/writing was common among the students of both colleges (20%). Kinesthetic style was preferred by 34% of students of private vs 20% from Government institution. Conclusion: Teaching should involve all sensory modality so that all types of students can actively participate in learning session.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信