澳门大学EMI(英语教学)学习:学生的观点、内容和语言成果

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yan Wang, Shulin Yu
{"title":"澳门大学EMI(英语教学)学习:学生的观点、内容和语言成果","authors":"Yan Wang, Shulin Yu","doi":"10.1080/02188791.2023.2270725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWhile English as the medium of instruction (EMI) is becoming a popular institutional practice across the globe, the bulk of research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding its effectiveness for students’ content and language learning. Through a qualitative inquiry into students’ EMI experiences in a Macau university, the study discovered that content learning and language proficiency are vague terms to describe students’ learning outcomes, which consist of multiple dimensions, including knowledge mastery, access to information, disciplinary professionalism, academic/disciplinary English and Chinese proficiency, etc. While EMI promoted student learning in some dimensions, it failed in others, and it is unrealistic to judge the overall effectiveness of EMI as a curriculum provision. The study confirms previous research findings on EMI as an ineffective means for knowledge mastery and further exposes this as a problem that can hardly be remedied by raising admission requirements on students’ English proficiency in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Additional issues and challenges of EMI were identified in the study, including a quandary in promoting students’ bilingual academic and disciplinary proficiency in English and their mother tongue. Suggestions for future research are given, and ideas for possible measures to help students cope with EMI in EFL contexts are discussed.KEYWORDS: English-medium instructionChinese-medium instructionhigher educationEMI programlanguage education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Geolocation informationThe study was conducted in Macau SAR, China.Research ethicsThe study was reviewed and approved by the Sub-Panel on Social Science & Humanities Research Ethics, Panel on Research Ethics of the University of Macau. (the reference number is the same as the grant number above)Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Macau under Grant [number MYRG2014-00170-FED]Notes on contributorsYan WangYan Wang is an Assistant Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. She conducts research in areas including English as the medium of instruction, internationalization of higher education, and cross-cultural issues in education.Shulin YuShulin Yu is Associate Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. His research interests include second language writing and classroom feedback and assessment in higher education. His publications have appeared in Educational Research Review, Assessing Writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Language Teaching Research, Language Teaching, and TESOL Quarterly.","PeriodicalId":47010,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Education","volume":"35 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning through EMI (English-medium instruction) in a Macau university: students’ perspectives and content and language outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wang, Shulin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02188791.2023.2270725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTWhile English as the medium of instruction (EMI) is becoming a popular institutional practice across the globe, the bulk of research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding its effectiveness for students’ content and language learning. Through a qualitative inquiry into students’ EMI experiences in a Macau university, the study discovered that content learning and language proficiency are vague terms to describe students’ learning outcomes, which consist of multiple dimensions, including knowledge mastery, access to information, disciplinary professionalism, academic/disciplinary English and Chinese proficiency, etc. While EMI promoted student learning in some dimensions, it failed in others, and it is unrealistic to judge the overall effectiveness of EMI as a curriculum provision. The study confirms previous research findings on EMI as an ineffective means for knowledge mastery and further exposes this as a problem that can hardly be remedied by raising admission requirements on students’ English proficiency in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Additional issues and challenges of EMI were identified in the study, including a quandary in promoting students’ bilingual academic and disciplinary proficiency in English and their mother tongue. Suggestions for future research are given, and ideas for possible measures to help students cope with EMI in EFL contexts are discussed.KEYWORDS: English-medium instructionChinese-medium instructionhigher educationEMI programlanguage education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Geolocation informationThe study was conducted in Macau SAR, China.Research ethicsThe study was reviewed and approved by the Sub-Panel on Social Science & Humanities Research Ethics, Panel on Research Ethics of the University of Macau. (the reference number is the same as the grant number above)Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Macau under Grant [number MYRG2014-00170-FED]Notes on contributorsYan WangYan Wang is an Assistant Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. She conducts research in areas including English as the medium of instruction, internationalization of higher education, and cross-cultural issues in education.Shulin YuShulin Yu is Associate Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. His research interests include second language writing and classroom feedback and assessment in higher education. His publications have appeared in Educational Research Review, Assessing Writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Language Teaching Research, Language Teaching, and TESOL Quarterly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2270725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2270725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要虽然以英语为教学媒介(EMI)在全球范围内已成为一种流行的制度实践,但关于其对学生内容和语言学习的有效性,大量的研究得出了不一致的结果。本研究透过对一所澳门大学学生的EMI体验进行质性调查,发现内容学习和语言能力是描述学生学习成果的模糊术语,包括知识掌握、资讯获取、学科专业、学术/学科中英文水平等多个维度。虽然EMI在某些方面促进了学生的学习,但它在其他方面却失败了,而且判断EMI作为课程规定的整体有效性是不现实的。该研究证实了先前的研究结果,即EMI是一种无效的知识掌握手段,并进一步揭示了这是一个很难通过提高学生在英语作为外语(EFL)背景下的英语水平的入学要求来补救的问题。研究还发现了EMI的其他问题和挑战,包括在促进学生在英语和母语方面的双语学术和学科熟练程度方面的困境。对未来的研究提出了建议,并讨论了帮助学生在英语环境中应对EMI的可能措施。关键词:英语教学;中文教学;高等教育;emi项目;语言教育披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。地理位置信息本研究在中国澳门特别行政区进行。研究伦理本研究由澳门大学社会科学及人文科学研究伦理小组及研究伦理小组审核通过。(参考编号与上述基金编号相同)附加信息本研究由澳门大学资助,基金编号为MYRG2014-00170-FED。作者简介:王岩,中国澳门特别行政区澳门大学教育学院助理教授。她的研究领域包括英语作为教学媒介、高等教育国际化和教育中的跨文化问题。俞树林,中国澳门特别行政区澳门大学教育学院副教授。主要研究方向为第二语言写作、高等教育课堂反馈与评估。曾在《教育研究评论》、《写作评估》、《第二语言写作杂志》、《语言教学研究》、《语言教学》、《TESOL季刊》等刊物发表文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning through EMI (English-medium instruction) in a Macau university: students’ perspectives and content and language outcomes
ABSTRACTWhile English as the medium of instruction (EMI) is becoming a popular institutional practice across the globe, the bulk of research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding its effectiveness for students’ content and language learning. Through a qualitative inquiry into students’ EMI experiences in a Macau university, the study discovered that content learning and language proficiency are vague terms to describe students’ learning outcomes, which consist of multiple dimensions, including knowledge mastery, access to information, disciplinary professionalism, academic/disciplinary English and Chinese proficiency, etc. While EMI promoted student learning in some dimensions, it failed in others, and it is unrealistic to judge the overall effectiveness of EMI as a curriculum provision. The study confirms previous research findings on EMI as an ineffective means for knowledge mastery and further exposes this as a problem that can hardly be remedied by raising admission requirements on students’ English proficiency in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Additional issues and challenges of EMI were identified in the study, including a quandary in promoting students’ bilingual academic and disciplinary proficiency in English and their mother tongue. Suggestions for future research are given, and ideas for possible measures to help students cope with EMI in EFL contexts are discussed.KEYWORDS: English-medium instructionChinese-medium instructionhigher educationEMI programlanguage education Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Geolocation informationThe study was conducted in Macau SAR, China.Research ethicsThe study was reviewed and approved by the Sub-Panel on Social Science & Humanities Research Ethics, Panel on Research Ethics of the University of Macau. (the reference number is the same as the grant number above)Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Macau under Grant [number MYRG2014-00170-FED]Notes on contributorsYan WangYan Wang is an Assistant Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. She conducts research in areas including English as the medium of instruction, internationalization of higher education, and cross-cultural issues in education.Shulin YuShulin Yu is Associate Professor at Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China. His research interests include second language writing and classroom feedback and assessment in higher education. His publications have appeared in Educational Research Review, Assessing Writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, Language Teaching Research, Language Teaching, and TESOL Quarterly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
Asia Pacific Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信