从综合两党过渡:2018年5月至2022年3月马来西亚州选举

Chin-Huat Wong
{"title":"从综合两党过渡:2018年5月至2022年3月马来西亚州选举","authors":"Chin-Huat Wong","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2023.2271413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis election article explains Malaysia’s winding democratization trajectory from one-coalition predominance (1957–1990) to aggregated bipartism (1990–2015, with intermissions) to fluid multipartism (particularly in the aftermath of 2020 to the present day), with the help of multilevel party system framework. The findings demonstrate that state-level dynamics can facilitate or impede the formation and sustenance of aggregated bipartism, known as the Two-Coalition System, in Malaysia. I identify the state-level factors that affect the emergence of, and disruptions to, aggregated bipartism in 1990-2015, and analyse the outcome of 16 state elections held between May 2018 and March 2022 amidst Malaysia’s transition from aggregated bipartism.KEYWORDS: Malaysiamultilevel party systemaggregated bipartismstate electionsethnic politicsparty reduction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For simplicity and consistency, election years are used to demarcate phases or periods, except for the starting of fluid multipartism in 2015.2 The unsustainability of this brief revival of BN’s hegemony is explained in Wong (Citation2018).3 The details of parties and coalitions mentioned in this article are provided in Appendix 1 in the online depository.4 An extended bibliography on Malaysian party politics is provided in Appendix 2 in the online depository.5 The current names of MCA and other parties are used here for ease of reference.6 Some may argue that bipartism emerged only in 1999 when the major opposition parties formally formed one coalition, BA, or only existed between 2008 and 2015 when PR competed rigorously against BN as a unified bloc controlling at least three states. However, as explained later, the formations and disintegrations of GR-APU, BA and PR were too similar for the quarter century (1990–2015) to not be seen as a party system distinctive from the periods before and after, notwithstanding the two intermissions in 1995–1999 and 2004–2008 which saw a brief revival of one-coalition predominance.7 GRS eventually evolved to exclude BN and national parties except Bersatu’s Sabah chapter.","PeriodicalId":74654,"journal":{"name":"Regional & federal studies","volume":"23 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning from aggregated bipartism: state elections in Malaysia, May 2018–March 2022\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Huat Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13597566.2023.2271413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis election article explains Malaysia’s winding democratization trajectory from one-coalition predominance (1957–1990) to aggregated bipartism (1990–2015, with intermissions) to fluid multipartism (particularly in the aftermath of 2020 to the present day), with the help of multilevel party system framework. The findings demonstrate that state-level dynamics can facilitate or impede the formation and sustenance of aggregated bipartism, known as the Two-Coalition System, in Malaysia. I identify the state-level factors that affect the emergence of, and disruptions to, aggregated bipartism in 1990-2015, and analyse the outcome of 16 state elections held between May 2018 and March 2022 amidst Malaysia’s transition from aggregated bipartism.KEYWORDS: Malaysiamultilevel party systemaggregated bipartismstate electionsethnic politicsparty reduction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For simplicity and consistency, election years are used to demarcate phases or periods, except for the starting of fluid multipartism in 2015.2 The unsustainability of this brief revival of BN’s hegemony is explained in Wong (Citation2018).3 The details of parties and coalitions mentioned in this article are provided in Appendix 1 in the online depository.4 An extended bibliography on Malaysian party politics is provided in Appendix 2 in the online depository.5 The current names of MCA and other parties are used here for ease of reference.6 Some may argue that bipartism emerged only in 1999 when the major opposition parties formally formed one coalition, BA, or only existed between 2008 and 2015 when PR competed rigorously against BN as a unified bloc controlling at least three states. However, as explained later, the formations and disintegrations of GR-APU, BA and PR were too similar for the quarter century (1990–2015) to not be seen as a party system distinctive from the periods before and after, notwithstanding the two intermissions in 1995–1999 and 2004–2008 which saw a brief revival of one-coalition predominance.7 GRS eventually evolved to exclude BN and national parties except Bersatu’s Sabah chapter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional & federal studies\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional & federal studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2271413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional & federal studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2271413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要这篇选举文章解释了马来西亚在多层次政党制度框架的帮助下,从单一联盟主导(1957-1990)到聚合两党(1990-2015,间歇)再到流动多党制(特别是在2020年之后至今)的曲折民主化轨迹。研究结果表明,在马来西亚,州一级的动态可以促进或阻碍聚合两党制度的形成和维持,即两党联盟制度。我确定了影响1990-2015年总体两党制出现和中断的州级因素,并分析了2018年5月至2022年3月马来西亚从总体两党制过渡期间举行的16个州选举的结果。关键词:马来西亚多层次政党制度聚合两党州选举民族政党减少披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1为了简单和一致,除了2015年开始的多党制流动之外,选举年被用来划分阶段或时期。2 .国阵霸权的短暂复兴是不可持续的,Wong (Citation2018)解释了这一点本文中提到的政党和联盟的详细信息在在线存储库的附录1中提供在线资料库的附录2提供了马来西亚政党政治的扩展参考书目5 .为方便参考,此处使用马华和其他政党的现行名称有些人可能会说,两党合作只出现在1999年,当时主要反对党正式组成了一个联盟,即民阵,或者只存在于2008年至2015年,当时民联作为一个控制至少三个州的统一集团,与国阵激烈竞争。然而,正如后面解释的那样,尽管在1995-1999年和2004-2008年的两次间歇期间,一个联盟主导地位的短暂复苏,但在过去的四分之一世纪(1990-2015年)中,GR-APU、BA和PR的形成和解体过于相似,以至于不能被视为与之前和之后时期不同的政党制度GRS最终演变为排除国阵和国家政党,除了Bersatu的沙巴分会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning from aggregated bipartism: state elections in Malaysia, May 2018–March 2022
ABSTRACTThis election article explains Malaysia’s winding democratization trajectory from one-coalition predominance (1957–1990) to aggregated bipartism (1990–2015, with intermissions) to fluid multipartism (particularly in the aftermath of 2020 to the present day), with the help of multilevel party system framework. The findings demonstrate that state-level dynamics can facilitate or impede the formation and sustenance of aggregated bipartism, known as the Two-Coalition System, in Malaysia. I identify the state-level factors that affect the emergence of, and disruptions to, aggregated bipartism in 1990-2015, and analyse the outcome of 16 state elections held between May 2018 and March 2022 amidst Malaysia’s transition from aggregated bipartism.KEYWORDS: Malaysiamultilevel party systemaggregated bipartismstate electionsethnic politicsparty reduction Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For simplicity and consistency, election years are used to demarcate phases or periods, except for the starting of fluid multipartism in 2015.2 The unsustainability of this brief revival of BN’s hegemony is explained in Wong (Citation2018).3 The details of parties and coalitions mentioned in this article are provided in Appendix 1 in the online depository.4 An extended bibliography on Malaysian party politics is provided in Appendix 2 in the online depository.5 The current names of MCA and other parties are used here for ease of reference.6 Some may argue that bipartism emerged only in 1999 when the major opposition parties formally formed one coalition, BA, or only existed between 2008 and 2015 when PR competed rigorously against BN as a unified bloc controlling at least three states. However, as explained later, the formations and disintegrations of GR-APU, BA and PR were too similar for the quarter century (1990–2015) to not be seen as a party system distinctive from the periods before and after, notwithstanding the two intermissions in 1995–1999 and 2004–2008 which saw a brief revival of one-coalition predominance.7 GRS eventually evolved to exclude BN and national parties except Bersatu’s Sabah chapter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信