课堂中的历史思维:一个多案例研究

David Bussell
{"title":"课堂中的历史思维:一个多案例研究","authors":"David Bussell","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2023.2274051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn recent decades, history and education scholars in the Western world have argued for a constructivist approach to disciplinary thinking in the teaching and learning of History, known as historical thinking. Yet, there has been little classroom-based empirical research exploring how teachers engage with historical thinking theory, enact related practices in the classroom, and, in Canada, utilize historical thinking concepts. The multiple-case study outlined here addresses this gap, by offering descriptive details and insights regarding four Canadian secondary school teachers’ attitudes, understandings, implementation, and applications of historical thinking in lessons and assessments. Differences among these teachers’ perceptions and practices indicate that historical thinking is not a singular pedagogical approach. Yet, common elements revealed two broadly drawn typologies that may serve as inspiration and provide concrete examples for history teachers wishing to develop their own historical thinking practices. Rich descriptions also provide unique insights into how the teachers use their judgment and knowledge in the choices and decisions they make to move theory to practice. Finally, this study offers a methodology for the continued classroom-based study of historical thinking.Keywords: History educationhistorical thinkinghistorical thinking conceptscritical thinkingcurriculum implementationinquiry-based pedagogyteaching practice AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Dr. Ruth Sandwell and Dr. Gillian R. Rosenberg for their editorial support.","PeriodicalId":93719,"journal":{"name":"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)","volume":"69 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Thinking in the Classroom: A Multiple-Case Study\",\"authors\":\"David Bussell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00377996.2023.2274051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn recent decades, history and education scholars in the Western world have argued for a constructivist approach to disciplinary thinking in the teaching and learning of History, known as historical thinking. Yet, there has been little classroom-based empirical research exploring how teachers engage with historical thinking theory, enact related practices in the classroom, and, in Canada, utilize historical thinking concepts. The multiple-case study outlined here addresses this gap, by offering descriptive details and insights regarding four Canadian secondary school teachers’ attitudes, understandings, implementation, and applications of historical thinking in lessons and assessments. Differences among these teachers’ perceptions and practices indicate that historical thinking is not a singular pedagogical approach. Yet, common elements revealed two broadly drawn typologies that may serve as inspiration and provide concrete examples for history teachers wishing to develop their own historical thinking practices. Rich descriptions also provide unique insights into how the teachers use their judgment and knowledge in the choices and decisions they make to move theory to practice. Finally, this study offers a methodology for the continued classroom-based study of historical thinking.Keywords: History educationhistorical thinkinghistorical thinking conceptscritical thinkingcurriculum implementationinquiry-based pedagogyteaching practice AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Dr. Ruth Sandwell and Dr. Gillian R. Rosenberg for their editorial support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2023.2274051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2023.2274051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,西方世界的历史和教育学者一直主张在历史教学中采用建构主义的学科思维方法,即历史思维。然而,很少有基于课堂的实证研究探讨教师如何参与历史思维理论,在课堂上制定相关实践,以及在加拿大如何利用历史思维概念。本文概述的多案例研究通过提供四位加拿大中学教师在课程和评估中对历史思维的态度、理解、实施和应用的描述性细节和见解,解决了这一差距。这些教师的观念和实践的差异表明,历史思维不是一种单一的教学方法。然而,共同的元素揭示了两种大致的类型学,可以为希望发展自己的历史思维实践的历史教师提供灵感和具体的例子。丰富的描述也为教师如何在选择和决策中运用他们的判断和知识,将理论付诸实践提供了独特的见解。最后,本研究为继续以课堂为基础的历史思维研究提供了一种方法论。关键词:历史教育历史思维历史思维概念批判性思维课程实施探究式教学法教学实践致谢我要感谢Ruth Sandwell博士和Gillian R. Rosenberg博士在编辑方面的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Thinking in the Classroom: A Multiple-Case Study
AbstractIn recent decades, history and education scholars in the Western world have argued for a constructivist approach to disciplinary thinking in the teaching and learning of History, known as historical thinking. Yet, there has been little classroom-based empirical research exploring how teachers engage with historical thinking theory, enact related practices in the classroom, and, in Canada, utilize historical thinking concepts. The multiple-case study outlined here addresses this gap, by offering descriptive details and insights regarding four Canadian secondary school teachers’ attitudes, understandings, implementation, and applications of historical thinking in lessons and assessments. Differences among these teachers’ perceptions and practices indicate that historical thinking is not a singular pedagogical approach. Yet, common elements revealed two broadly drawn typologies that may serve as inspiration and provide concrete examples for history teachers wishing to develop their own historical thinking practices. Rich descriptions also provide unique insights into how the teachers use their judgment and knowledge in the choices and decisions they make to move theory to practice. Finally, this study offers a methodology for the continued classroom-based study of historical thinking.Keywords: History educationhistorical thinkinghistorical thinking conceptscritical thinkingcurriculum implementationinquiry-based pedagogyteaching practice AcknowledgmentI would like to thank Dr. Ruth Sandwell and Dr. Gillian R. Rosenberg for their editorial support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信