对获取性信息的威胁:研究2011-2021年美国最常受到挑战的书籍

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dina Pinsky, Emily Brenner
{"title":"对获取性信息的威胁:研究2011-2021年美国最常受到挑战的书籍","authors":"Dina Pinsky, Emily Brenner","doi":"10.1080/14681811.2023.2272126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBook censorship efforts in the USA have become increasingly concerning for champions of freedom of expression and civil liberties. The movement to ban books is seemingly driven by a desire to curtail adolescents’ access to information about sexuality and gender diversity. This paper details the findings of a content analysis of the American Library Association’s (ALA) Top 10 Most Challenged Books list from 2011 to 2021. The authors analysed purported reasons for book challenges along with target age groups for the 42 books within our sample period. We found that most of the books in the ALA Top 10 list were challenged for reasons related to sexuality and/or LGBTQ themes. Between 2011 and 2015, book challengers were most likely to claim to be motivated by general perceptions of ‘sexual explicitness’. However, after 2016, and perhaps as a backlash against the Federal Government's legalisation of same-sex marriage, purported LGBTQ content in books was a stronger motivator. Given that most of the books in the top 10 most challenged list are intended for adolescent readers, our findings have implications for informal sex education and access to information about LGBTQ lives.KEYWORDS: Sex educationbookscensorshipadolescentsLGBTQ identitiessexuality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":47510,"journal":{"name":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","volume":"15 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threats to accessing information about sexuality: examining the most frequently challenged books in the USA from 2011-2021\",\"authors\":\"Dina Pinsky, Emily Brenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681811.2023.2272126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTBook censorship efforts in the USA have become increasingly concerning for champions of freedom of expression and civil liberties. The movement to ban books is seemingly driven by a desire to curtail adolescents’ access to information about sexuality and gender diversity. This paper details the findings of a content analysis of the American Library Association’s (ALA) Top 10 Most Challenged Books list from 2011 to 2021. The authors analysed purported reasons for book challenges along with target age groups for the 42 books within our sample period. We found that most of the books in the ALA Top 10 list were challenged for reasons related to sexuality and/or LGBTQ themes. Between 2011 and 2015, book challengers were most likely to claim to be motivated by general perceptions of ‘sexual explicitness’. However, after 2016, and perhaps as a backlash against the Federal Government's legalisation of same-sex marriage, purported LGBTQ content in books was a stronger motivator. Given that most of the books in the top 10 most challenged list are intended for adolescent readers, our findings have implications for informal sex education and access to information about LGBTQ lives.KEYWORDS: Sex educationbookscensorshipadolescentsLGBTQ identitiessexuality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2023.2272126\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2023.2272126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要美国的图书审查制度越来越受到言论自由和公民自由倡导者的关注。禁书运动似乎是为了减少青少年获得性和性别多样性信息的机会。本文详细介绍了对美国图书馆协会(ALA) 2011年至2021年十大最具挑战性书籍列表的内容分析结果。作者分析了在我们的样本期内42本书的目标年龄组以及书籍挑战的所谓原因。我们发现,美国图书协会十大图书中,大多数都因为与性和/或LGBTQ主题有关的原因而受到挑战。在2011年至2015年期间,书籍挑战者最有可能声称自己的动机是“性暴露”的普遍看法。然而,在2016年之后,也许是对联邦政府同性婚姻合法化的强烈反对,书中所谓的LGBTQ内容成为了更强大的动力。考虑到10本最具挑战性的书大多是针对青少年读者的,我们的发现对非正式的性教育和获取关于LGBTQ生活的信息具有启示意义。关键词:性教育、审查、青少年、lgbt、tq身份、性取向披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threats to accessing information about sexuality: examining the most frequently challenged books in the USA from 2011-2021
ABSTRACTBook censorship efforts in the USA have become increasingly concerning for champions of freedom of expression and civil liberties. The movement to ban books is seemingly driven by a desire to curtail adolescents’ access to information about sexuality and gender diversity. This paper details the findings of a content analysis of the American Library Association’s (ALA) Top 10 Most Challenged Books list from 2011 to 2021. The authors analysed purported reasons for book challenges along with target age groups for the 42 books within our sample period. We found that most of the books in the ALA Top 10 list were challenged for reasons related to sexuality and/or LGBTQ themes. Between 2011 and 2015, book challengers were most likely to claim to be motivated by general perceptions of ‘sexual explicitness’. However, after 2016, and perhaps as a backlash against the Federal Government's legalisation of same-sex marriage, purported LGBTQ content in books was a stronger motivator. Given that most of the books in the top 10 most challenged list are intended for adolescent readers, our findings have implications for informal sex education and access to information about LGBTQ lives.KEYWORDS: Sex educationbookscensorshipadolescentsLGBTQ identitiessexuality Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信