客户关系利益:二阶元分析和替代框架

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Valter Afonso Vieira, Clécio Falcão Araujo, Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida
{"title":"客户关系利益:二阶元分析和替代框架","authors":"Valter Afonso Vieira,&nbsp;Clécio Falcão Araujo,&nbsp;Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.12987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous literature uses first-order meta-analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long-term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second-order meta-analysis on 41 first-order meta-analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product- versus consumer-related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three-stage model performs better. Third, the service-profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three-stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Customer relational benefit: A second-order meta-analysis and an alternative framework\",\"authors\":\"Valter Afonso Vieira,&nbsp;Clécio Falcão Araujo,&nbsp;Marcos Inácio Severo de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.12987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous literature uses first-order meta-analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long-term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second-order meta-analysis on 41 first-order meta-analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product- versus consumer-related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three-stage model performs better. Third, the service-profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three-stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.12987\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.12987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的文献采用一阶元分析法来克服关于客户关系利益的不同理论,但就所发现的关联性而言,结果喜忧参半。顾客关系利益最初被认为是一个单维概念,但它是一个综合的多维概念,包括信任、承诺、忠诚、满意、口碑以及长期关系交换中涉及的其他建构。作者对 41 项关于客户关系利益的一阶元分析进行了二阶元分析,共产生了 380 万个观测值和 3462 个独立样本,从而对这些构念之间的关系进行了整体概括。我们对三个理论模型进行了检验,并提出了一个替代性对手框架。主要结果表明,产品与消费者相关模型产生了强烈的忠诚度差异。其次,认知-情感-联想-行为模型在解释和预测忠诚度方面并不占优,但我们的三阶段模型表现更好。第三,服务-利润链模型在产生一系列效应(序列视角)方面是一个替代方案。第四,我们的新替代框架(基于忠诚度时间序列的三阶段模型)在解释某些构造方面效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Customer relational benefit: A second-order meta-analysis and an alternative framework

Previous literature uses first-order meta-analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long-term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second-order meta-analysis on 41 first-order meta-analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product- versus consumer-related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three-stage model performs better. Third, the service-profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three-stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信