什么是工作投入度?利用员工自我叙述的文本挖掘方法

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Henrico van Roekel, Enno F. J. Wigger, Bernard P. Veldkamp, Arnold B. Bakker
{"title":"什么是工作投入度?利用员工自我叙述的文本挖掘方法","authors":"Henrico van Roekel,&nbsp;Enno F. J. Wigger,&nbsp;Bernard P. Veldkamp,&nbsp;Arnold B. Bakker","doi":"10.1111/apps.12501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We introduce text mining to study work engagement by using this method to classify employees' survey-based self-narratives into high or low work engagement and analyzing the text features that contribute to the classification. We used two samples, representing the 2020 and 2021 waves of an annual survey among healthcare employees. In the first study, we used exploratory sample 1 (<i>N</i> = 5591) to explore which text features explain work engagement (unigrams, bigrams, psychological, or linguistic). In the second study, we confirmed whether features persisted over time between exploratory sample 1 and confirmatory sample 2 (<i>N</i> = 4470). We find that psychological features classify employees across two samples with 60% accuracy. These features partly validate the literature: High-engaged employees refer more to affiliation and positive emotions, and low-engaged employees refer more to negative emotions and power. We extend the literature by studying linguistics: High-engaged employees use more first-person plural (“we”) than low-engaged employees. Finally, some results question the literature, like the finding that low-engaged employees refer more to their managers. This study shows text mining can contribute by confirming, extending, or questioning the literature on work engagement and explores how future research could build on our findings with survey-based or in vivo applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 3","pages":"1071-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12501","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is work engagement? A text mining approach using employees' self-narratives\",\"authors\":\"Henrico van Roekel,&nbsp;Enno F. J. Wigger,&nbsp;Bernard P. Veldkamp,&nbsp;Arnold B. Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apps.12501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We introduce text mining to study work engagement by using this method to classify employees' survey-based self-narratives into high or low work engagement and analyzing the text features that contribute to the classification. We used two samples, representing the 2020 and 2021 waves of an annual survey among healthcare employees. In the first study, we used exploratory sample 1 (<i>N</i> = 5591) to explore which text features explain work engagement (unigrams, bigrams, psychological, or linguistic). In the second study, we confirmed whether features persisted over time between exploratory sample 1 and confirmatory sample 2 (<i>N</i> = 4470). We find that psychological features classify employees across two samples with 60% accuracy. These features partly validate the literature: High-engaged employees refer more to affiliation and positive emotions, and low-engaged employees refer more to negative emotions and power. We extend the literature by studying linguistics: High-engaged employees use more first-person plural (“we”) than low-engaged employees. Finally, some results question the literature, like the finding that low-engaged employees refer more to their managers. This study shows text mining can contribute by confirming, extending, or questioning the literature on work engagement and explores how future research could build on our findings with survey-based or in vivo applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"1071-1102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12501\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12501\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将文本挖掘引入工作投入度研究,利用这种方法将员工基于调查的自我叙述分为工作投入度高和低两类,并分析有助于分类的文本特征。我们使用了两个样本,分别代表 2020 年和 2021 年的医疗保健员工年度调查。在第一项研究中,我们使用了探索性样本 1(N = 5591)来探索哪些文本特征(单字符、双字符、心理或语言)可以解释工作投入度。在第二项研究中,我们确认了探索性样本 1 和确认性样本 2(样本数 = 4470)之间的特征是否会随着时间的推移而持续存在。我们发现,心理特征在两个样本中对员工进行分类的准确率为 60%。这些特征部分验证了相关文献:高参与度员工更多提及从属关系和积极情绪,而低参与度员工则更多提及消极情绪和权力。我们通过语言学研究对文献进行了扩展:高参与度员工比低参与度员工更多地使用第一人称复数("我们")。最后,一些结果对文献提出了质疑,如低投入员工更多地提及他们的经理。本研究表明,文本挖掘可以证实、扩展或质疑有关工作投入的文献,并探讨了未来的研究如何在我们的研究结果基础上,通过基于调查或活体应用的方式进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is work engagement? A text mining approach using employees' self-narratives

We introduce text mining to study work engagement by using this method to classify employees' survey-based self-narratives into high or low work engagement and analyzing the text features that contribute to the classification. We used two samples, representing the 2020 and 2021 waves of an annual survey among healthcare employees. In the first study, we used exploratory sample 1 (N = 5591) to explore which text features explain work engagement (unigrams, bigrams, psychological, or linguistic). In the second study, we confirmed whether features persisted over time between exploratory sample 1 and confirmatory sample 2 (N = 4470). We find that psychological features classify employees across two samples with 60% accuracy. These features partly validate the literature: High-engaged employees refer more to affiliation and positive emotions, and low-engaged employees refer more to negative emotions and power. We extend the literature by studying linguistics: High-engaged employees use more first-person plural (“we”) than low-engaged employees. Finally, some results question the literature, like the finding that low-engaged employees refer more to their managers. This study shows text mining can contribute by confirming, extending, or questioning the literature on work engagement and explores how future research could build on our findings with survey-based or in vivo applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信