充血性心力衰竭患者三尖瓣反流与心脏再同步化治疗反应的相互作用

Babak Payami, Elham Mohammadyari, Shahla Madjidi, Arezou Zoroufian
{"title":"充血性心力衰竭患者三尖瓣反流与心脏再同步化治疗反应的相互作用","authors":"Babak Payami, Elham Mohammadyari, Shahla Madjidi, Arezou Zoroufian","doi":"10.5812/jjcdc-137769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Aggravation of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a predictable issue following cardiac device implantation, while its clinical importance is subject to debate. Objectives: We aimed to recognize the alteration of TR following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and its effect on the response to CRT. Methods: In this prospective study, 70 candidates were recruited for CRT from those who visited two university hospitals in Tehran and Ahvaz (Iran) from January 2012 to March 2013. Baseline specifications were recorded for all the participants. All the patients underwent echocardiography before and 6 months after CRT administration. They were then divided into two categories for further comparison: (1) Patients with no or mild TR and (2) patients with moderate-to-severe TR. The echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decrease of >15% or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) advancement of >5%. The clinical response to CRT was one class improvement based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Results: Of the patients, 24 had moderate-to-severe TR. Although the increase in cases with moderate-to-severe TR after CRT was not significant, the aggravation of TR degree after the procedure was significant (P = 0.002). Moreover, the NYHA class significantly improved after the CRT (P = 0.02). The number of cases with a clinical response to CRT based on improvement of the NYHA class was significantly greater in patients with no TR or mild TR at baseline (P = 0.003). There was no significant variation in response to CRT among patients who experienced TR exacerbation after CRT compared with those who had no change or a reduction in TR. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that TR severity was exacerbated following CRT, but this alternation in TR severity had no significant effect on the response to CRT. Therefore, the presence and development of TR before and after CRT must not affect the criteria for choosing cardiac resynchronization therapy for appropriate patients.","PeriodicalId":471457,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Interaction Between Tricuspid Regurgitation and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure\",\"authors\":\"Babak Payami, Elham Mohammadyari, Shahla Madjidi, Arezou Zoroufian\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jjcdc-137769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Aggravation of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a predictable issue following cardiac device implantation, while its clinical importance is subject to debate. Objectives: We aimed to recognize the alteration of TR following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and its effect on the response to CRT. Methods: In this prospective study, 70 candidates were recruited for CRT from those who visited two university hospitals in Tehran and Ahvaz (Iran) from January 2012 to March 2013. Baseline specifications were recorded for all the participants. All the patients underwent echocardiography before and 6 months after CRT administration. They were then divided into two categories for further comparison: (1) Patients with no or mild TR and (2) patients with moderate-to-severe TR. The echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decrease of >15% or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) advancement of >5%. The clinical response to CRT was one class improvement based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Results: Of the patients, 24 had moderate-to-severe TR. Although the increase in cases with moderate-to-severe TR after CRT was not significant, the aggravation of TR degree after the procedure was significant (P = 0.002). Moreover, the NYHA class significantly improved after the CRT (P = 0.02). The number of cases with a clinical response to CRT based on improvement of the NYHA class was significantly greater in patients with no TR or mild TR at baseline (P = 0.003). There was no significant variation in response to CRT among patients who experienced TR exacerbation after CRT compared with those who had no change or a reduction in TR. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that TR severity was exacerbated following CRT, but this alternation in TR severity had no significant effect on the response to CRT. Therefore, the presence and development of TR before and after CRT must not affect the criteria for choosing cardiac resynchronization therapy for appropriate patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-137769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-137769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏装置植入后三尖瓣反流(TR)加重是一个可预测的问题,但其临床重要性仍存在争议。目的:了解心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)后TR的改变及其对CRT疗效的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,从2012年1月至2013年3月在伊朗德黑兰和阿瓦士两所大学医院就诊的患者中招募70名CRT患者。记录所有参与者的基线规格。所有患者在给予CRT治疗前和治疗后6个月均行超声心动图检查。然后将他们分为两类进行进一步比较:(1)无TR或轻度TR患者和(2)中度至重度TR患者。超声心动图对CRT的反应定义为左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)减少15%或左心室射血分数(LVEF)提高5%。根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级,CRT的临床反应为一级改善。结果:患者中重度TR 24例,CRT术后中重度TR虽无明显增加,但术后TR加重程度有明显差异(P = 0.002)。此外,CRT后NYHA评分显著提高(P = 0.02)。在基线时无TR或轻度TR的患者中,基于NYHA分级改善而对CRT有临床反应的病例数显着增加(P = 0.003)。CRT后TR加重的患者与TR未改变或减轻的患者相比,对CRT的反应无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,CRT后TR严重程度加重,但TR严重程度的改变对CRT的反应无显著影响。因此,CRT前后TR的存在和发展绝不能影响合适患者选择心脏再同步化治疗的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Interaction Between Tricuspid Regurgitation and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure
Background: Aggravation of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a predictable issue following cardiac device implantation, while its clinical importance is subject to debate. Objectives: We aimed to recognize the alteration of TR following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and its effect on the response to CRT. Methods: In this prospective study, 70 candidates were recruited for CRT from those who visited two university hospitals in Tehran and Ahvaz (Iran) from January 2012 to March 2013. Baseline specifications were recorded for all the participants. All the patients underwent echocardiography before and 6 months after CRT administration. They were then divided into two categories for further comparison: (1) Patients with no or mild TR and (2) patients with moderate-to-severe TR. The echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) decrease of >15% or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) advancement of >5%. The clinical response to CRT was one class improvement based on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Results: Of the patients, 24 had moderate-to-severe TR. Although the increase in cases with moderate-to-severe TR after CRT was not significant, the aggravation of TR degree after the procedure was significant (P = 0.002). Moreover, the NYHA class significantly improved after the CRT (P = 0.02). The number of cases with a clinical response to CRT based on improvement of the NYHA class was significantly greater in patients with no TR or mild TR at baseline (P = 0.003). There was no significant variation in response to CRT among patients who experienced TR exacerbation after CRT compared with those who had no change or a reduction in TR. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that TR severity was exacerbated following CRT, but this alternation in TR severity had no significant effect on the response to CRT. Therefore, the presence and development of TR before and after CRT must not affect the criteria for choosing cardiac resynchronization therapy for appropriate patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信