探索无节制使用社交媒体、害怕错过、害怕更好的选择以及害怕做任何事对消费者购买意向的影响

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
José A. Flecha Ortiz, María Santos Corrada, Stephanie Perez, Virgin Dones, Luis H. Rodriguez
{"title":"探索无节制使用社交媒体、害怕错过、害怕更好的选择以及害怕做任何事对消费者购买意向的影响","authors":"José A. Flecha Ortiz,&nbsp;María Santos Corrada,&nbsp;Stephanie Perez,&nbsp;Virgin Dones,&nbsp;Luis H. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.12990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid evolution of the digital era has resulted in new theoretical models that seek answers to consumer behavior, but only some have been empirically validated. The social theory of fear of (FO) has gained notoriety as a type of social anxiety, resulting in psychological dependence on social media (SNS). These social anxieties transcend and are used as strategic resources to activate quick consumer responses. However, three forces act in the study of FO that positively or negatively impact decision-making: (a) fear of missing out (FoMO), (b) fear of better options (FoBO), and (c) fear of doing anything (FoDA). The literature has analyzed the positive implications of FoMO on consumers' decision-making from different perspectives, but there needs to be a gap in analyzing how FoMO affects consumers. More analysis of the forces that affect decision-making through FoBO and FoDA acts is needed. Consequently, this study examined how the FoMO, FoBO, and FoDA affect the purchase intention of SNS users. The roles of SNS usage and anticipated emotions as forces that trigger FO were analyzed. Finally, we examined whether motivation to participate in social media is a force that can moderate how consumers trigger FO. An electronic survey of 543 participants and active social media users revealed that social media use, anticipated emotions, and motivation to participate are forces that explain how they trigger FO through their first-stage FoMO on consumers. The results reflect theoretical and practical implications by concluding that the FoMO for marketing purposes is significant in decision-making. However, FoBO and FoDA inhibit the consumer's ability to commit to a decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the influence of uncontrolled social media use, fear of missing out, fear of better options, and fear of doing anything on consumer purchase intent\",\"authors\":\"José A. Flecha Ortiz,&nbsp;María Santos Corrada,&nbsp;Stephanie Perez,&nbsp;Virgin Dones,&nbsp;Luis H. Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.12990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rapid evolution of the digital era has resulted in new theoretical models that seek answers to consumer behavior, but only some have been empirically validated. The social theory of fear of (FO) has gained notoriety as a type of social anxiety, resulting in psychological dependence on social media (SNS). These social anxieties transcend and are used as strategic resources to activate quick consumer responses. However, three forces act in the study of FO that positively or negatively impact decision-making: (a) fear of missing out (FoMO), (b) fear of better options (FoBO), and (c) fear of doing anything (FoDA). The literature has analyzed the positive implications of FoMO on consumers' decision-making from different perspectives, but there needs to be a gap in analyzing how FoMO affects consumers. More analysis of the forces that affect decision-making through FoBO and FoDA acts is needed. Consequently, this study examined how the FoMO, FoBO, and FoDA affect the purchase intention of SNS users. The roles of SNS usage and anticipated emotions as forces that trigger FO were analyzed. Finally, we examined whether motivation to participate in social media is a force that can moderate how consumers trigger FO. An electronic survey of 543 participants and active social media users revealed that social media use, anticipated emotions, and motivation to participate are forces that explain how they trigger FO through their first-stage FoMO on consumers. The results reflect theoretical and practical implications by concluding that the FoMO for marketing purposes is significant in decision-making. However, FoBO and FoDA inhibit the consumer's ability to commit to a decision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.12990\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.12990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字时代的快速发展催生了新的理论模型,为消费者行为寻找答案,但只有部分理论模型得到了实证验证。恐惧(FO)社会理论作为一种社会焦虑而声名鹊起,它导致了对社交媒体(SNS)的心理依赖。这些社会焦虑超越并被用作激活消费者快速反应的战略资源。然而,在对 FO 的研究中,有三种力量会对决策产生积极或消极的影响:(a)害怕错过(FoMO),(b)害怕更好的选择(FoBO),以及(c)害怕做任何事(FoDA)。文献从不同角度分析了 FoMO 对消费者决策的积极影响,但在分析 FoMO 如何影响消费者方面还存在不足。需要对通过 FoBO 和 FoDA 行为影响决策的力量进行更多分析。因此,本研究探讨了 FoMO、FoBO 和 FoDA 如何影响 SNS 用户的购买意向。我们分析了 SNS 的使用和预期情绪作为触发 FO 的力量的作用。最后,我们研究了参与社交媒体的动机是否是一种可以调节消费者如何触发 FO 的力量。对 543 名参与者和社交媒体活跃用户进行的电子调查显示,社交媒体的使用、预期情绪和参与动机是通过其对消费者的第一阶段 FoMO 来解释如何触发 FO 的力量。研究结果反映了理论和实践意义,得出结论认为,以营销为目的的 FoMO 对决策具有重要意义。然而,FoBO 和 FoDA 会抑制消费者做出决策的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the influence of uncontrolled social media use, fear of missing out, fear of better options, and fear of doing anything on consumer purchase intent

The rapid evolution of the digital era has resulted in new theoretical models that seek answers to consumer behavior, but only some have been empirically validated. The social theory of fear of (FO) has gained notoriety as a type of social anxiety, resulting in psychological dependence on social media (SNS). These social anxieties transcend and are used as strategic resources to activate quick consumer responses. However, three forces act in the study of FO that positively or negatively impact decision-making: (a) fear of missing out (FoMO), (b) fear of better options (FoBO), and (c) fear of doing anything (FoDA). The literature has analyzed the positive implications of FoMO on consumers' decision-making from different perspectives, but there needs to be a gap in analyzing how FoMO affects consumers. More analysis of the forces that affect decision-making through FoBO and FoDA acts is needed. Consequently, this study examined how the FoMO, FoBO, and FoDA affect the purchase intention of SNS users. The roles of SNS usage and anticipated emotions as forces that trigger FO were analyzed. Finally, we examined whether motivation to participate in social media is a force that can moderate how consumers trigger FO. An electronic survey of 543 participants and active social media users revealed that social media use, anticipated emotions, and motivation to participate are forces that explain how they trigger FO through their first-stage FoMO on consumers. The results reflect theoretical and practical implications by concluding that the FoMO for marketing purposes is significant in decision-making. However, FoBO and FoDA inhibit the consumer's ability to commit to a decision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信