对于轻至中度COVID-19患者,住院接受伊维菌素与死亡率、疾病进展或住院时间无益处相关

IF 0.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Adam Hasse, Kimberly Korwek, Russell E. Poland
{"title":"对于轻至中度COVID-19患者,住院接受伊维菌素与死亡率、疾病进展或住院时间无益处相关","authors":"Adam Hasse, Kimberly Korwek, Russell E. Poland","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Use of the antiparasitic agent ivermectin as a potential treatment for early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not recommended, yet inpatient administration continues to be seen. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients admitted to a large health system of community hospitals for COVID-19 to assess the association of ivermectin administration, either early in disease course or at higher severity, with mortality and disease progression (intensive care unit admission or use of mechanical ventilation). Propensity match analysis was used to account for covariates. Results Of the 122,002 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 included in this analysis, 1.1% (1380) received ivermectin while at mild to moderate severity (on room air or nasal cannula), and 0.2% (n = 293) received the drug while severe (noninvasive or mechanical ventilation). Among those who received it with mild to moderate severity, there was no effect on relative risk (RR) of mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802–1.27), intensive care unit admission (RR, 0.984; 95% CI, 0.865–1.12), or use of mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.976; 95% CI, 0.777–1.23), but an increase in average length of stay (mean days, 8.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.001). Of those who received their first dose of ivermectin with more severe COVID-19, there was an increase in the RR of mortality (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.34–1.99; P < 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patients admitted with mild to moderate COVID-19, in-hospital administration of ivermectin provides no benefit in mortality or disease progression when administered early in the disease course, and may contribute to excess mortality when administered to patients at more severe disease states.","PeriodicalId":13952,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Hospital Receipt of Ivermectin Is Associated With No Benefit in Mortality, Disease Progression, or Length of Stay for Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Adam Hasse, Kimberly Korwek, Russell E. Poland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Use of the antiparasitic agent ivermectin as a potential treatment for early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not recommended, yet inpatient administration continues to be seen. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients admitted to a large health system of community hospitals for COVID-19 to assess the association of ivermectin administration, either early in disease course or at higher severity, with mortality and disease progression (intensive care unit admission or use of mechanical ventilation). Propensity match analysis was used to account for covariates. Results Of the 122,002 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 included in this analysis, 1.1% (1380) received ivermectin while at mild to moderate severity (on room air or nasal cannula), and 0.2% (n = 293) received the drug while severe (noninvasive or mechanical ventilation). Among those who received it with mild to moderate severity, there was no effect on relative risk (RR) of mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802–1.27), intensive care unit admission (RR, 0.984; 95% CI, 0.865–1.12), or use of mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.976; 95% CI, 0.777–1.23), but an increase in average length of stay (mean days, 8.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.001). Of those who received their first dose of ivermectin with more severe COVID-19, there was an increase in the RR of mortality (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.34–1.99; P < 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patients admitted with mild to moderate COVID-19, in-hospital administration of ivermectin provides no benefit in mortality or disease progression when administered early in the disease course, and may contribute to excess mortality when administered to patients at more severe disease states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不推荐使用抗寄生虫药伊维菌素作为早期冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的潜在治疗方法,但仍有住院给药的情况。方法回顾性分析一个大型社区医院卫生系统收治的10万多例COVID-19患者,评估伊维菌素给药(病程早期或较高严重程度)与死亡率和疾病进展(重症监护病房入住或使用机械通气)的关系。倾向匹配分析用于解释协变量。结果纳入本分析的122,002例COVID-19住院患者中,1.1%(1380例)在轻中度严重(室内空气或鼻插管)时接受伊维菌素治疗,0.2% (n = 293)在严重(无创或机械通气)时接受伊维菌素治疗。在接受轻度至中度严重程度治疗的患者中,对死亡率的相对风险(RR)没有影响(RR, 1.01;95%可信区间[CI], 0.802-1.27),重症监护病房入院(RR, 0.984;95% CI, 0.865-1.12)或使用机械通气(RR, 0.976;95% CI, 0.777-1.23),但平均住院时间增加(平均天数,8.0 vs 7.5;P & lt;0.001)。在那些接受第一剂伊维菌素治疗的COVID-19更严重的患者中,死亡率的RR增加(RR, 1.63;95% ci, 1.34-1.99;P & lt;0.001)。结论在轻中度COVID-19住院患者中,在病程早期给予伊维菌素对死亡率或疾病进展没有益处,而在病情较严重的患者中给予伊维菌素可能导致死亡率过高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-Hospital Receipt of Ivermectin Is Associated With No Benefit in Mortality, Disease Progression, or Length of Stay for Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19
Background Use of the antiparasitic agent ivermectin as a potential treatment for early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not recommended, yet inpatient administration continues to be seen. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients admitted to a large health system of community hospitals for COVID-19 to assess the association of ivermectin administration, either early in disease course or at higher severity, with mortality and disease progression (intensive care unit admission or use of mechanical ventilation). Propensity match analysis was used to account for covariates. Results Of the 122,002 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 included in this analysis, 1.1% (1380) received ivermectin while at mild to moderate severity (on room air or nasal cannula), and 0.2% (n = 293) received the drug while severe (noninvasive or mechanical ventilation). Among those who received it with mild to moderate severity, there was no effect on relative risk (RR) of mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802–1.27), intensive care unit admission (RR, 0.984; 95% CI, 0.865–1.12), or use of mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.976; 95% CI, 0.777–1.23), but an increase in average length of stay (mean days, 8.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.001). Of those who received their first dose of ivermectin with more severe COVID-19, there was an increase in the RR of mortality (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.34–1.99; P < 0.001). Conclusion Among hospitalized patients admitted with mild to moderate COVID-19, in-hospital administration of ivermectin provides no benefit in mortality or disease progression when administered early in the disease course, and may contribute to excess mortality when administered to patients at more severe disease states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Medical professionals seeking an infectious diseases journal with true clinical value need look no further than Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. Here, clinicians can get full coverage consolidated into one resource, with pertinent new developments presented in a way that makes them easy to apply to patient care. From HIV care delivery to Hepatitis C virus testing…travel and tropical medicine…and infection surveillance, prevention, and control, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice delivers the vital information needed to optimally prevent and treat infectious diseases. Indexed/abstracted in: EMBASE, SCOPUS, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信