{"title":"柬埔寨高中学生综合学习指数之开发与验证","authors":"Bunhe Harth, Suwimon Wongwanich, Chayut Piromsombat","doi":"10.59865/abacj.2023.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop an instrument for measuring student learning and to establish a learning index for high school students. A sample of 1,619 Cambodian high school students was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected through a 56-item questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale and were analyzed using various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, content analysis, objectivity analysis, correlation analysis, construct validity (using M-plus), reliability analysis (using the R-package for Windows), and t-test analysis. The instrument consists of two key components: “Learning to Know” and “Learning to Do”, each further broken down into ‘Process’ and ‘Outcome’ elements. Each of these sub-components were represented by three distinct indicators. The instrument demonstrated good content validity with an Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index ranging between 0.50 and 1.00, and excellent construct validity, supported by a variety of goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02). The instrument also showed high internal consistency with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.93. The criterion-related validity was confirmed through known-groups validation. Two methods—criterion-related and norm-related—were used to determine students’ learning index levels. For this study, the norm-related method was chosen. The learning index was categorized into four levels: low (0.000 - 0.062), medium (0.063 - 0.375), relatively high (0.376 - 0.680), and high (0.681 - 1.000). Percentile ranks were also calculated to provide additional context for interpreting the learning indices of Cambodian high school students.","PeriodicalId":52152,"journal":{"name":"ABAC Journal","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Composite Learning Index for Cambodian High School Students\",\"authors\":\"Bunhe Harth, Suwimon Wongwanich, Chayut Piromsombat\",\"doi\":\"10.59865/abacj.2023.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to develop an instrument for measuring student learning and to establish a learning index for high school students. A sample of 1,619 Cambodian high school students was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected through a 56-item questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale and were analyzed using various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, content analysis, objectivity analysis, correlation analysis, construct validity (using M-plus), reliability analysis (using the R-package for Windows), and t-test analysis. The instrument consists of two key components: “Learning to Know” and “Learning to Do”, each further broken down into ‘Process’ and ‘Outcome’ elements. Each of these sub-components were represented by three distinct indicators. The instrument demonstrated good content validity with an Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index ranging between 0.50 and 1.00, and excellent construct validity, supported by a variety of goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02). The instrument also showed high internal consistency with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.93. The criterion-related validity was confirmed through known-groups validation. Two methods—criterion-related and norm-related—were used to determine students’ learning index levels. For this study, the norm-related method was chosen. The learning index was categorized into four levels: low (0.000 - 0.062), medium (0.063 - 0.375), relatively high (0.376 - 0.680), and high (0.681 - 1.000). Percentile ranks were also calculated to provide additional context for interpreting the learning indices of Cambodian high school students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABAC Journal\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABAC Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2023.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABAC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2023.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of a Composite Learning Index for Cambodian High School Students
This study aimed to develop an instrument for measuring student learning and to establish a learning index for high school students. A sample of 1,619 Cambodian high school students was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected through a 56-item questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale and were analyzed using various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, content analysis, objectivity analysis, correlation analysis, construct validity (using M-plus), reliability analysis (using the R-package for Windows), and t-test analysis. The instrument consists of two key components: “Learning to Know” and “Learning to Do”, each further broken down into ‘Process’ and ‘Outcome’ elements. Each of these sub-components were represented by three distinct indicators. The instrument demonstrated good content validity with an Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index ranging between 0.50 and 1.00, and excellent construct validity, supported by a variety of goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02). The instrument also showed high internal consistency with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.93. The criterion-related validity was confirmed through known-groups validation. Two methods—criterion-related and norm-related—were used to determine students’ learning index levels. For this study, the norm-related method was chosen. The learning index was categorized into four levels: low (0.000 - 0.062), medium (0.063 - 0.375), relatively high (0.376 - 0.680), and high (0.681 - 1.000). Percentile ranks were also calculated to provide additional context for interpreting the learning indices of Cambodian high school students.