{"title":"适应语言伪装技术:以stem为中心的美国校园社区对非母语英语的态度","authors":"Sarah E. Hercula, Jessica L. Cundiff","doi":"10.1080/15348458.2023.2252491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study evaluates attitudes toward nonnative Englishes among students, faculty, and staff at a STEM-focused U.S. university. The study utilizes the verbal-guise technique: Participants listened to and rated three summaries of the same short story as told by native speakers of U.S. English, Chinese, and Arabic. This adapted verbal-guise methodology allows for the inclusion and analysis of grammatical and lexical features—in addition to phonological features—in speaker recordings. Results reveal preferential bias in favor of native-speaker U.S. English, yet each nonnative English speaker was rated significantly differently. The native Arabic speaker was rated as less likeable and competent than the native Chinese and English speakers, while also receiving higher ratings in speech similarity and pleasantness than the native Chinese speaker. Participants’ attitudes toward and confidence with intercultural communication moderated ratings of the nonnative Englishes: Participants with more positive attitudes and greater confidence rated the native speakers of Chinese and Arabic higher on variables including speech pleasantness and willingness to interact. Findings suggest ways to improve attitudes toward nonnative Englishes on college campuses—STEM-focused campuses, specifically.KEYWORDS: Diversity and inclusionhigher educationlanguage attitudeslinguistic prejudicenonnative Englishesverbal-guise technique Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by funding from the First-Year Research Experience (FYRE) program in the College of Arts, Sciences, and Education at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Special thanks also to Taylor McNamee and Anna Peacock, who served as undergraduate research assistants on this project through the FYRE program.Notes on contributorsSarah E. HerculaSarah E. Hercula is an associate professor of applied linguistics in the Department of English and Technical Communication at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, MO. She holds a PhD in English studies with a specialization in linguistics from Illinois State University. Her research interests include English language variation, language attitudes and ideologies, and linguistics pedagogy, among others. Her most recent book is entitled Fostering Linguistic Equality: The SISE Approach to the Introductory Linguistics Course (Palgrave Macmillan 2020).Jessica L. CundiffJessica L. Cundiff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological Science and Director of the S&T ADVANCE program at Missouri University of Science & Technology. She earned a dual PhD in Social Psychology and Women’s Studies at Penn State University. Her research examines stereotyping and discrimination, with a focus on gender bias and identifying effective strategies (and pitfalls) for addressing bias.","PeriodicalId":46978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting the Verbal-Guise Technique: A STEM-Focused U.S. Campus Community’s Attitudes Toward Nonnative Englishes\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Hercula, Jessica L. Cundiff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15348458.2023.2252491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study evaluates attitudes toward nonnative Englishes among students, faculty, and staff at a STEM-focused U.S. university. The study utilizes the verbal-guise technique: Participants listened to and rated three summaries of the same short story as told by native speakers of U.S. English, Chinese, and Arabic. This adapted verbal-guise methodology allows for the inclusion and analysis of grammatical and lexical features—in addition to phonological features—in speaker recordings. Results reveal preferential bias in favor of native-speaker U.S. English, yet each nonnative English speaker was rated significantly differently. The native Arabic speaker was rated as less likeable and competent than the native Chinese and English speakers, while also receiving higher ratings in speech similarity and pleasantness than the native Chinese speaker. Participants’ attitudes toward and confidence with intercultural communication moderated ratings of the nonnative Englishes: Participants with more positive attitudes and greater confidence rated the native speakers of Chinese and Arabic higher on variables including speech pleasantness and willingness to interact. Findings suggest ways to improve attitudes toward nonnative Englishes on college campuses—STEM-focused campuses, specifically.KEYWORDS: Diversity and inclusionhigher educationlanguage attitudeslinguistic prejudicenonnative Englishesverbal-guise technique Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by funding from the First-Year Research Experience (FYRE) program in the College of Arts, Sciences, and Education at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Special thanks also to Taylor McNamee and Anna Peacock, who served as undergraduate research assistants on this project through the FYRE program.Notes on contributorsSarah E. HerculaSarah E. Hercula is an associate professor of applied linguistics in the Department of English and Technical Communication at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, MO. She holds a PhD in English studies with a specialization in linguistics from Illinois State University. Her research interests include English language variation, language attitudes and ideologies, and linguistics pedagogy, among others. Her most recent book is entitled Fostering Linguistic Equality: The SISE Approach to the Introductory Linguistics Course (Palgrave Macmillan 2020).Jessica L. CundiffJessica L. Cundiff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological Science and Director of the S&T ADVANCE program at Missouri University of Science & Technology. She earned a dual PhD in Social Psychology and Women’s Studies at Penn State University. Her research examines stereotyping and discrimination, with a focus on gender bias and identifying effective strategies (and pitfalls) for addressing bias.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Identity and Education\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Identity and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2252491\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2252491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究评估了一所以stem为重点的美国大学的学生、教师和工作人员对非母语英语的态度。这项研究使用了语言伪装技术:参与者听了由美国英语、汉语和阿拉伯语母语人士讲述的同一篇短篇故事的三篇摘要,并对其进行评分。这种经过调整的语言伪装方法允许包括和分析说话人录音中的语法和词汇特征——除了语音特征之外。结果显示对美国英语母语者的偏好偏向,但每个非英语母语者的评分显著不同。与以汉语和英语为母语的人相比,以阿拉伯语为母语的人被认为不那么讨人喜欢和能干,而在言语相似性和愉快度方面,他们的得分也高于以汉语为母语的人。参与者对跨文化交际的态度和信心调节了对非英语母语者的评分:态度更积极和信心更强的参与者对汉语和阿拉伯语母语者的评分更高,包括言语愉快和互动意愿。研究结果提出了改善大学校园——特别是以stem为重点的校园——对非母语英语的态度的方法。关键词:多样性与包容性高等教育语言态度语言偏见非母语英语语言伪装技术披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由密苏里科技大学艺术、科学和教育学院的第一年研究经验(FYRE)项目资助。特别感谢泰勒·麦克纳米和安娜·皮科克,他们在FYRE项目中担任本科生研究助理。sarah E. Hercula是密苏里州科技大学英语和技术传播系应用语言学副教授。她拥有伊利诺伊州立大学语言学专业的英语研究博士学位。她的研究兴趣包括英语语言变异、语言态度和意识形态、语言学教学法等。她最近的一本书名为《促进语言平等:语言学入门课程的SISE方法》(Palgrave Macmillan 2020)。Jessica L. Cundiff是密苏里科技大学心理科学系副教授,也是科技进步项目主任。她在宾夕法尼亚州立大学获得了社会心理学和妇女研究的双博士学位。她的研究考察了刻板印象和歧视,重点是性别偏见,并确定了解决偏见的有效策略(和陷阱)。
Adapting the Verbal-Guise Technique: A STEM-Focused U.S. Campus Community’s Attitudes Toward Nonnative Englishes
ABSTRACTThis study evaluates attitudes toward nonnative Englishes among students, faculty, and staff at a STEM-focused U.S. university. The study utilizes the verbal-guise technique: Participants listened to and rated three summaries of the same short story as told by native speakers of U.S. English, Chinese, and Arabic. This adapted verbal-guise methodology allows for the inclusion and analysis of grammatical and lexical features—in addition to phonological features—in speaker recordings. Results reveal preferential bias in favor of native-speaker U.S. English, yet each nonnative English speaker was rated significantly differently. The native Arabic speaker was rated as less likeable and competent than the native Chinese and English speakers, while also receiving higher ratings in speech similarity and pleasantness than the native Chinese speaker. Participants’ attitudes toward and confidence with intercultural communication moderated ratings of the nonnative Englishes: Participants with more positive attitudes and greater confidence rated the native speakers of Chinese and Arabic higher on variables including speech pleasantness and willingness to interact. Findings suggest ways to improve attitudes toward nonnative Englishes on college campuses—STEM-focused campuses, specifically.KEYWORDS: Diversity and inclusionhigher educationlanguage attitudeslinguistic prejudicenonnative Englishesverbal-guise technique Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by funding from the First-Year Research Experience (FYRE) program in the College of Arts, Sciences, and Education at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Special thanks also to Taylor McNamee and Anna Peacock, who served as undergraduate research assistants on this project through the FYRE program.Notes on contributorsSarah E. HerculaSarah E. Hercula is an associate professor of applied linguistics in the Department of English and Technical Communication at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, MO. She holds a PhD in English studies with a specialization in linguistics from Illinois State University. Her research interests include English language variation, language attitudes and ideologies, and linguistics pedagogy, among others. Her most recent book is entitled Fostering Linguistic Equality: The SISE Approach to the Introductory Linguistics Course (Palgrave Macmillan 2020).Jessica L. CundiffJessica L. Cundiff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychological Science and Director of the S&T ADVANCE program at Missouri University of Science & Technology. She earned a dual PhD in Social Psychology and Women’s Studies at Penn State University. Her research examines stereotyping and discrimination, with a focus on gender bias and identifying effective strategies (and pitfalls) for addressing bias.