经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的灾难性医疗支出和自付费用

Sulmaz Ghahramani, AmirAli Rastegar Kazerooni, Sedigheh Hasannia, Mohammad Sayari, Amir Hossein Rastegar Kazerooni, Kamran B. Lankarani
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的灾难性医疗支出和自付费用","authors":"Sulmaz Ghahramani, AmirAli Rastegar Kazerooni, Sedigheh Hasannia, Mohammad Sayari, Amir Hossein Rastegar Kazerooni, Kamran B. Lankarani","doi":"10.5812/jjcdc-138446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: When households have high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, they are more likely to experience poverty and encounter catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). Heart disease is a significant cause of health decline and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to provide essential knowledge about CHE and OOP for heart disease patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Shiraz, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study with two prospective follow-ups was conducted in three heart surgery centers in Shiraz, Iran. The data were collected using the world health survey (WHS). Catastrophic health expenditures and OOP were asked from the most informed family member. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling was employed to identify the main factors related to CHE and OOP. Binary distribution with logit link and gamma distribution with log link were used for CHE and OOP, respectively. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: We found that OOP payment among patients who needed cardiovascular services in public-private partnership (PPP) hospitals was 76,953,100 Rials (R), equal to 2,506.78 $ (USD) (SD = 53,247,600 R/1,734.56 $) in the PCI group and 230,937,700 R equal to 7,522.89 $ (SD = 248,295,200 R/8,088.32 $) in the CABG group. This value in public hospitals was 15,083,800 R, equal to 491.36 $ (SD = 18,637,600 R/ 607.13 $) in the PCI group and 12,276,800 R, equal to 399.92 $ (SD = 11,131,900 R/ 362.63 $) in the CABG group. We also found that admission duration, age, type of hospital, and being currently a smoker were significant factors for OOP (P-value < 0.05). During baseline assessment, we also found that the percentage of PCI patients that faced CHE was 95.56% and 47.92% in PPP and public hospitals, respectively. This value in CABG patients was 92.31% and 40.45%. Our study showed that the type of hospital and socioeconomic status were significant factors (P-value < 0.05) that pushed a family facing CHE. Conclusions: The baseline CHE is very high in both PCI and CABG patients. Thus, the government should pay special attention to this issue. Further investigations are needed on factors affecting OOP and CHE.","PeriodicalId":471457,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Out-of-pocket Payments for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)\",\"authors\":\"Sulmaz Ghahramani, AmirAli Rastegar Kazerooni, Sedigheh Hasannia, Mohammad Sayari, Amir Hossein Rastegar Kazerooni, Kamran B. Lankarani\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jjcdc-138446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: When households have high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, they are more likely to experience poverty and encounter catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). Heart disease is a significant cause of health decline and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to provide essential knowledge about CHE and OOP for heart disease patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Shiraz, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study with two prospective follow-ups was conducted in three heart surgery centers in Shiraz, Iran. The data were collected using the world health survey (WHS). Catastrophic health expenditures and OOP were asked from the most informed family member. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling was employed to identify the main factors related to CHE and OOP. Binary distribution with logit link and gamma distribution with log link were used for CHE and OOP, respectively. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: We found that OOP payment among patients who needed cardiovascular services in public-private partnership (PPP) hospitals was 76,953,100 Rials (R), equal to 2,506.78 $ (USD) (SD = 53,247,600 R/1,734.56 $) in the PCI group and 230,937,700 R equal to 7,522.89 $ (SD = 248,295,200 R/8,088.32 $) in the CABG group. This value in public hospitals was 15,083,800 R, equal to 491.36 $ (SD = 18,637,600 R/ 607.13 $) in the PCI group and 12,276,800 R, equal to 399.92 $ (SD = 11,131,900 R/ 362.63 $) in the CABG group. We also found that admission duration, age, type of hospital, and being currently a smoker were significant factors for OOP (P-value < 0.05). During baseline assessment, we also found that the percentage of PCI patients that faced CHE was 95.56% and 47.92% in PPP and public hospitals, respectively. This value in CABG patients was 92.31% and 40.45%. Our study showed that the type of hospital and socioeconomic status were significant factors (P-value < 0.05) that pushed a family facing CHE. Conclusions: The baseline CHE is very high in both PCI and CABG patients. Thus, the government should pay special attention to this issue. Further investigations are needed on factors affecting OOP and CHE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-138446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-138446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当家庭有较高的自付费用时,他们更有可能经历贫困和遭遇灾难性卫生支出(CHE)。心脏病是健康下降和死亡的重要原因。目的:本研究旨在为在伊朗设拉子接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心脏病患者提供有关CHE和OOP的基本知识。方法:在伊朗设拉子的三家心脏外科中心进行了横断面研究,并进行了两次前瞻性随访。数据是利用世界卫生调查(WHS)收集的。灾难性卫生支出和OOP是向最了解情况的家庭成员询问的。采用广义估计方程(Generalized estimation equation, GEE)模型识别影响CHE和OOP的主要因素。CHE和OOP分别采用logit链接的二进制分布和log链接的伽玛分布。显著性水平设为0.05。结果:我们发现,在公私合作(PPP)医院需要心血管服务的患者中,PCI组的OOP支付为76,953,100里亚尔(R),等于2,506.78美元(USD) (SD = 53,247,600里亚尔/1,734.56美元),CABG组为230,937,700里亚尔,等于7,522.89美元(SD = 248,295,200里亚尔/8,088.32美元)。公立医院PCI组该值为15,083,800 R,等于491.36美元(SD = 18,637,600 R/ 607.13美元),CABG组该值为12,276,800 R,等于399.92美元(SD = 11,131,900 R/ 362.63美元)。我们还发现住院时间、年龄、医院类型和目前是否吸烟是OOP的显著因素(p值<0.05)。在基线评估中,我们还发现PPP医院和公立医院PCI患者面临CHE的比例分别为95.56%和47.92%。CABG患者的这一数值分别为92.31%和40.45%。我们的研究表明,医院类型和社会经济状况是显著影响因素(p值<0.05),迫使一个家庭面对CHE。结论:PCI和CABG患者的基线CHE都非常高。因此,政府应该特别关注这个问题。影响OOP和CHE的因素有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Out-of-pocket Payments for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)
Background: When households have high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, they are more likely to experience poverty and encounter catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). Heart disease is a significant cause of health decline and mortality. Objectives: This study aimed to provide essential knowledge about CHE and OOP for heart disease patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Shiraz, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study with two prospective follow-ups was conducted in three heart surgery centers in Shiraz, Iran. The data were collected using the world health survey (WHS). Catastrophic health expenditures and OOP were asked from the most informed family member. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling was employed to identify the main factors related to CHE and OOP. Binary distribution with logit link and gamma distribution with log link were used for CHE and OOP, respectively. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: We found that OOP payment among patients who needed cardiovascular services in public-private partnership (PPP) hospitals was 76,953,100 Rials (R), equal to 2,506.78 $ (USD) (SD = 53,247,600 R/1,734.56 $) in the PCI group and 230,937,700 R equal to 7,522.89 $ (SD = 248,295,200 R/8,088.32 $) in the CABG group. This value in public hospitals was 15,083,800 R, equal to 491.36 $ (SD = 18,637,600 R/ 607.13 $) in the PCI group and 12,276,800 R, equal to 399.92 $ (SD = 11,131,900 R/ 362.63 $) in the CABG group. We also found that admission duration, age, type of hospital, and being currently a smoker were significant factors for OOP (P-value < 0.05). During baseline assessment, we also found that the percentage of PCI patients that faced CHE was 95.56% and 47.92% in PPP and public hospitals, respectively. This value in CABG patients was 92.31% and 40.45%. Our study showed that the type of hospital and socioeconomic status were significant factors (P-value < 0.05) that pushed a family facing CHE. Conclusions: The baseline CHE is very high in both PCI and CABG patients. Thus, the government should pay special attention to this issue. Further investigations are needed on factors affecting OOP and CHE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信