{"title":"纳米氧化石墨烯对常规和树脂改性玻璃离子单体微泄漏影响的评价","authors":"Farahnaz Sharafeddin, Parisa Ghodrati","doi":"10.1155/2023/8853495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. One of the important features of the restorative materials is the ability to seal and prevent the microleakage. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) still exhibits some microleakage despite establishing a chemical bond to the tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nanographene oxide (nGO) on the microleakage of conventional (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Methods. Thirty intact extracted molars were used. Class V cavities were prepared on their buccal and lingual surfaces. The samples randomly divided into two main groups of CGIC and RMGIC; each of them was randomly subdivided into three subgroups, including the group without nGO (control), the group with 1% nGO, and the group with 2% nGO. After restoring the cavities, they were subjected to thermocycling (1,000 cycles at 5/55°C). Two percent basic fuchsin solution was used to perform the microleakage test, and then the sectioned samples were examined by a stereomicroscope 40x. Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyze the data ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). Results. Group CGIC + 1% nGO at the gingival margin and group RMGIC + 1% nGO at both gingival and occlusal margins had significantly less microleakage than their control groups ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.008</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.023</mn> </math> , respectively). Also, in these two groups, there were no significant differences between the microleakage of the occlusal and gingival margins ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M5\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.132</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M6\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.511</mn> </math> , respectively), while in all other groups, the gingival microleakage was significantly higher than that of occlusal microleakage. Conclusions. The addition of 1% nGO significantly reduced the gingival microleakage of CGIC and the occlusal and the gingival microleakage of RMGIC, while the addition of 2% nGO did not cause a significant reduction in microleakage.","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":" 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer\",\"authors\":\"Farahnaz Sharafeddin, Parisa Ghodrati\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8853495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives. One of the important features of the restorative materials is the ability to seal and prevent the microleakage. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) still exhibits some microleakage despite establishing a chemical bond to the tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nanographene oxide (nGO) on the microleakage of conventional (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Methods. Thirty intact extracted molars were used. Class V cavities were prepared on their buccal and lingual surfaces. The samples randomly divided into two main groups of CGIC and RMGIC; each of them was randomly subdivided into three subgroups, including the group without nGO (control), the group with 1% nGO, and the group with 2% nGO. After restoring the cavities, they were subjected to thermocycling (1,000 cycles at 5/55°C). Two percent basic fuchsin solution was used to perform the microleakage test, and then the sectioned samples were examined by a stereomicroscope 40x. Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyze the data ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M1\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). Results. Group CGIC + 1% nGO at the gingival margin and group RMGIC + 1% nGO at both gingival and occlusal margins had significantly less microleakage than their control groups ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M2\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.008</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M3\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M4\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.023</mn> </math> , respectively). Also, in these two groups, there were no significant differences between the microleakage of the occlusal and gingival margins ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M5\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.132</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M6\\\"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.511</mn> </math> , respectively), while in all other groups, the gingival microleakage was significantly higher than that of occlusal microleakage. Conclusions. The addition of 1% nGO significantly reduced the gingival microleakage of CGIC and the occlusal and the gingival microleakage of RMGIC, while the addition of 2% nGO did not cause a significant reduction in microleakage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8853495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8853495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标。修复材料的一个重要特点是具有密封和防止微泄漏的能力。玻璃离子水门合剂(GIC)尽管与牙齿建立了化学键,但仍表现出一些微渗漏。本研究的目的是评价纳米氧化石墨烯(nGO)对常规(CGIC)和树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC)微泄漏的影响。方法。使用30颗完整的拔牙。在口腔和舌面制备V类牙槽。样本随机分为CGIC和RMGIC两大组;随机分为无nGO组(对照组)、nGO含量1%组和nGO含量2%组。修复空洞后,进行热循环(在5/55°C下进行1000次循环)。用百分之二的碱性品红溶液进行微渗漏试验,然后用40倍体视显微镜检查切片样品。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Dunn检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对数据进行分析(P <0.05)。结果。龈缘CGIC + 1% nGO组和龈缘和牙合缘RMGIC + 1% nGO组的微漏明显少于对照组(P = 0.008, P = 0.002, P = 0.023)。两组牙合区与龈缘的微渗漏差异无统计学意义(P = 0.132, P = 0.511),而其他各组牙龈微渗漏均显著高于牙合区微渗漏。结论。1% nGO的加入显著降低了CGIC的牙龈微漏和RMGIC的咬合及牙龈微漏,而2% nGO的加入没有显著降低微漏。
Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Objectives. One of the important features of the restorative materials is the ability to seal and prevent the microleakage. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) still exhibits some microleakage despite establishing a chemical bond to the tooth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nanographene oxide (nGO) on the microleakage of conventional (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Methods. Thirty intact extracted molars were used. Class V cavities were prepared on their buccal and lingual surfaces. The samples randomly divided into two main groups of CGIC and RMGIC; each of them was randomly subdivided into three subgroups, including the group without nGO (control), the group with 1% nGO, and the group with 2% nGO. After restoring the cavities, they were subjected to thermocycling (1,000 cycles at 5/55°C). Two percent basic fuchsin solution was used to perform the microleakage test, and then the sectioned samples were examined by a stereomicroscope 40x. Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyze the data ( ). Results. Group CGIC + 1% nGO at the gingival margin and group RMGIC + 1% nGO at both gingival and occlusal margins had significantly less microleakage than their control groups ( , , , respectively). Also, in these two groups, there were no significant differences between the microleakage of the occlusal and gingival margins ( , , respectively), while in all other groups, the gingival microleakage was significantly higher than that of occlusal microleakage. Conclusions. The addition of 1% nGO significantly reduced the gingival microleakage of CGIC and the occlusal and the gingival microleakage of RMGIC, while the addition of 2% nGO did not cause a significant reduction in microleakage.