加拿大马尼托巴省公共草地土地覆被分类遥感清单评估

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jan Bryan M. Encabo, Marcos R. C. Cordeiro, Nasem Badreldin, Emma J. McGeough, David Walker
{"title":"加拿大马尼托巴省公共草地土地覆被分类遥感清单评估","authors":"Jan Bryan M. Encabo,&nbsp;Marcos R. C. Cordeiro,&nbsp;Nasem Badreldin,&nbsp;Emma J. McGeough,&nbsp;David Walker","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Land cover classification is one of the most common applications of remote sensing and is used for developing and modifying land management policies on agricultural landscapes to achieve conservation and economic goals, such as reducing grassland degradation and improving livestock and crop production. In this study, the grassland classification of the crown lands (public grasslands in Canada) from a newly developed remotely sensed dataset in the Prairie Province of Manitoba (i.e., the Manitoba Grassland Inventory, MGI) was assessed in terms of accuracy by comparison to non-spatial government records. The analysis consisted of (i) converting non-spatial records from the provincial crown land database to spatially-defined parcels by performing parcel delineations using geographic information system (GIS) and R programming tools, (ii) summarising the MGI classification at the same spatial scale, and (iii) comparing the agreement between MGI and the crown land database. The most common land cover types identified were: forest (30%) and shrubland (25%), followed by native (10%) and tame (9%) grasslands. However, the class agreements between woody (i.e., forests and shrublands) and grassy (i.e., native and tame grasslands) vegetation classes were low between these datasets because of their spectral similarities. Based on these results, we suggest additional refinements on both sensor and ground data to improve the classification agreement between these datasets. This study is one of the first attempts to compare ground-collected government records against a remotely sensed product in Manitoba.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"78 4","pages":"590-601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12631","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of remotely sensed inventories for land cover classification of public grasslands in Manitoba, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Jan Bryan M. Encabo,&nbsp;Marcos R. C. Cordeiro,&nbsp;Nasem Badreldin,&nbsp;Emma J. McGeough,&nbsp;David Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Land cover classification is one of the most common applications of remote sensing and is used for developing and modifying land management policies on agricultural landscapes to achieve conservation and economic goals, such as reducing grassland degradation and improving livestock and crop production. In this study, the grassland classification of the crown lands (public grasslands in Canada) from a newly developed remotely sensed dataset in the Prairie Province of Manitoba (i.e., the Manitoba Grassland Inventory, MGI) was assessed in terms of accuracy by comparison to non-spatial government records. The analysis consisted of (i) converting non-spatial records from the provincial crown land database to spatially-defined parcels by performing parcel delineations using geographic information system (GIS) and R programming tools, (ii) summarising the MGI classification at the same spatial scale, and (iii) comparing the agreement between MGI and the crown land database. The most common land cover types identified were: forest (30%) and shrubland (25%), followed by native (10%) and tame (9%) grasslands. However, the class agreements between woody (i.e., forests and shrublands) and grassy (i.e., native and tame grasslands) vegetation classes were low between these datasets because of their spectral similarities. Based on these results, we suggest additional refinements on both sensor and ground data to improve the classification agreement between these datasets. This study is one of the first attempts to compare ground-collected government records against a remotely sensed product in Manitoba.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"590-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12631\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地覆被分类是遥感技术最常见的应用之一,用于制定和修改农业用地的土地管理政策,以实现保护和经济目标,如减少草地退化和提高畜牧业和作物产量。在本研究中,通过与非空间政府记录进行比较,评估了马尼托巴省草原省新开发的遥感数据集(即马尼托巴草原清单,MGI)中的皇家土地(加拿大公共草原)草原分类的准确性。分析包括:(i) 通过使用地理信息系统 (GIS) 和 R 编程工具进行地块划分,将来自省政府土地数据库的非空间记录转换为空间定义的地块;(ii) 在相同的空间尺度上总结 MGI 分类;(iii) 比较 MGI 和政府土地数据库之间的一致性。最常见的土地覆被类型是:森林(30%)和灌木林地(25%),其次是原生草地(10%)和驯化草地(9%)。然而,由于光谱相似性,这些数据集之间的木本(即森林和灌木林地)和草本(即原生草地和驯化草地)植被类别之间的类别一致性较低。基于这些结果,我们建议对传感器和地面数据进行进一步改进,以提高这些数据集之间的分类一致性。这项研究是马尼托巴省首次尝试将地面采集的政府记录与遥感产品进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of remotely sensed inventories for land cover classification of public grasslands in Manitoba, Canada

Assessment of remotely sensed inventories for land cover classification of public grasslands in Manitoba, Canada

Land cover classification is one of the most common applications of remote sensing and is used for developing and modifying land management policies on agricultural landscapes to achieve conservation and economic goals, such as reducing grassland degradation and improving livestock and crop production. In this study, the grassland classification of the crown lands (public grasslands in Canada) from a newly developed remotely sensed dataset in the Prairie Province of Manitoba (i.e., the Manitoba Grassland Inventory, MGI) was assessed in terms of accuracy by comparison to non-spatial government records. The analysis consisted of (i) converting non-spatial records from the provincial crown land database to spatially-defined parcels by performing parcel delineations using geographic information system (GIS) and R programming tools, (ii) summarising the MGI classification at the same spatial scale, and (iii) comparing the agreement between MGI and the crown land database. The most common land cover types identified were: forest (30%) and shrubland (25%), followed by native (10%) and tame (9%) grasslands. However, the class agreements between woody (i.e., forests and shrublands) and grassy (i.e., native and tame grasslands) vegetation classes were low between these datasets because of their spectral similarities. Based on these results, we suggest additional refinements on both sensor and ground data to improve the classification agreement between these datasets. This study is one of the first attempts to compare ground-collected government records against a remotely sensed product in Manitoba.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信