运动神经传导研究中健康个体与腕管综合征患者Martin-Gruber吻合差异的评估

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ayfer Ertekin
{"title":"运动神经传导研究中健康个体与腕管综合征患者Martin-Gruber吻合差异的评估","authors":"Ayfer Ertekin","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v22i3.13798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Martin-Gruber anastomosis (MGA) represents a nerve innervation anomaly in the upper extremity, potentially leading to misinterpretation during standard nerve conduction studies (NCSs). This study aims to characterize the electrophysiological attributes of MGA in both healthy subjects and individuals diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
 Methods: This case-control study involved the electrophysiological assessment of 506 forearms, segregated into two distinct groups: a CTS positive (+) case group and a CTS negative (-) control group. The evaluations were conducted over an average period of 8 months in the neurophysiology laboratory. The study encompassed 294 forearms from 147 healthy individuals without CTS and 212 forearms from 106 patients diagnosed with CTS, both clinically and electrodiagnostically.
 Results: The relationship between the presence of type I MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.002). Similarly, the relationship between the presence of type II MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.013). On the other hand, the relationship between the presence of type III MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.208). Likewise, the relationship between the presence of type IV MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.807). The correlation between the side of type I MGA and the groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.770).
 The relationship between the side of type II MGA and the groups also did not attain statistical significance (P = 0.990). Similarly, the side of type III MGA and its association with the groups did not yield statistical significance (P = 0.402). Finally, the relationship between the side of type IV MGA and the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.166).
 Conclusion: The MGA represents a relatively frequent anatomical variation observed in the upper extremity. Notably, its presence demonstrated significance in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle (type II) and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle (type I) among patients with CTS. The present study emphasizes the importance of recognizing this variation during upper extremity NCSs for a correct diagnostic approach and treatment plan to avoid misdiagnosis of median-ulnar peripheral neuropathy.","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of Martin-Gruber anastomosis discrepancies between healthy individuals and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in motor nerve conduction studies\",\"authors\":\"Ayfer Ertekin\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cjn.v22i3.13798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Martin-Gruber anastomosis (MGA) represents a nerve innervation anomaly in the upper extremity, potentially leading to misinterpretation during standard nerve conduction studies (NCSs). This study aims to characterize the electrophysiological attributes of MGA in both healthy subjects and individuals diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
 Methods: This case-control study involved the electrophysiological assessment of 506 forearms, segregated into two distinct groups: a CTS positive (+) case group and a CTS negative (-) control group. The evaluations were conducted over an average period of 8 months in the neurophysiology laboratory. The study encompassed 294 forearms from 147 healthy individuals without CTS and 212 forearms from 106 patients diagnosed with CTS, both clinically and electrodiagnostically.
 Results: The relationship between the presence of type I MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.002). Similarly, the relationship between the presence of type II MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.013). On the other hand, the relationship between the presence of type III MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.208). Likewise, the relationship between the presence of type IV MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.807). The correlation between the side of type I MGA and the groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.770).
 The relationship between the side of type II MGA and the groups also did not attain statistical significance (P = 0.990). Similarly, the side of type III MGA and its association with the groups did not yield statistical significance (P = 0.402). Finally, the relationship between the side of type IV MGA and the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.166).
 Conclusion: The MGA represents a relatively frequent anatomical variation observed in the upper extremity. Notably, its presence demonstrated significance in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle (type II) and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle (type I) among patients with CTS. The present study emphasizes the importance of recognizing this variation during upper extremity NCSs for a correct diagnostic approach and treatment plan to avoid misdiagnosis of median-ulnar peripheral neuropathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v22i3.13798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v22i3.13798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Martin-Gruber吻合(MGA)代表上肢神经支配异常,可能导致标准神经传导研究(NCSs)的误解。本研究旨在描述健康受试者和诊断为腕管综合征(CTS)的个体MGA的电生理特征。方法:本病例对照研究包括506例前臂电生理评估,分为两组:CTS阳性(+)病例组和CTS阴性(-)对照组。评估在神经生理学实验室进行,平均时间为8个月。该研究包括147名未患CTS的健康个体的294只前臂和106名诊断为CTS的患者的212只前臂,包括临床和电诊断。结果:CTS(+)组与I型MGA的存在有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。同样,CTS(+)组与II型MGA存在的关系也有统计学意义(P = 0.013)。另一方面,CTS(+)组与III型MGA的存在无统计学意义(P = 0.208)。同样,CTS(+)组与IV型MGA的存在无统计学意义(P = 0.807)。I型MGA侧侧与组间相关性无统计学意义(P = 0.770)。 II型MGA侧位与组间的关系也无统计学意义(P = 0.990)。同样,III型MGA的侧边及其与各组的相关性也无统计学意义(P = 0.402)。最后,IV型MGA侧位与组间关系无统计学意义(P = 0.166)。 结论:上肢MGA是一种较为常见的解剖变异。值得注意的是,在CTS患者的第一背骨间肌(FDI) (II型)和指外展肌(ADM) (I型)中,其存在具有重要意义。本研究强调在上肢NCSs中认识到这种变异对于正确的诊断方法和治疗计划的重要性,以避免误诊中尺周围神经病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of Martin-Gruber anastomosis discrepancies between healthy individuals and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in motor nerve conduction studies
Background: The Martin-Gruber anastomosis (MGA) represents a nerve innervation anomaly in the upper extremity, potentially leading to misinterpretation during standard nerve conduction studies (NCSs). This study aims to characterize the electrophysiological attributes of MGA in both healthy subjects and individuals diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: This case-control study involved the electrophysiological assessment of 506 forearms, segregated into two distinct groups: a CTS positive (+) case group and a CTS negative (-) control group. The evaluations were conducted over an average period of 8 months in the neurophysiology laboratory. The study encompassed 294 forearms from 147 healthy individuals without CTS and 212 forearms from 106 patients diagnosed with CTS, both clinically and electrodiagnostically. Results: The relationship between the presence of type I MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.002). Similarly, the relationship between the presence of type II MGA and the CTS (+) group was statistically significant (P = 0.013). On the other hand, the relationship between the presence of type III MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.208). Likewise, the relationship between the presence of type IV MGA and the CTS (+) group was not statistically significant (P = 0.807). The correlation between the side of type I MGA and the groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.770). The relationship between the side of type II MGA and the groups also did not attain statistical significance (P = 0.990). Similarly, the side of type III MGA and its association with the groups did not yield statistical significance (P = 0.402). Finally, the relationship between the side of type IV MGA and the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.166). Conclusion: The MGA represents a relatively frequent anatomical variation observed in the upper extremity. Notably, its presence demonstrated significance in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle (type II) and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle (type I) among patients with CTS. The present study emphasizes the importance of recognizing this variation during upper extremity NCSs for a correct diagnostic approach and treatment plan to avoid misdiagnosis of median-ulnar peripheral neuropathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信