柏拉图的遗产:活得好

IF 0.8 4区教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jopedu/qhad047

Mark E Jonas, Yoshiaki Nakazawa

{"title":"柏拉图的遗产:活得好","authors":"Mark E Jonas, Yoshiaki Nakazawa","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this essay, we outline the central thesis of our recent book: A Platonic Theory of Moral Education: Cultivating Virtue in Contemporary Democratic Classrooms. We argue that the ethical, epistemological, political, and metaphysical doctrines typically attributed to Plato are not doctrines Plato holds, or at least are not doctrines that he holds in the way he is interpreted to have done. We claim that if we understand Plato’s relationship to these supposed doctrines better, we would discover that Plato’s views are not wildly implausible or ill-suited for contemporary democracies and the schooling they provide for their children. Rather, they are plausible and well-suited to contemporary democratic education. This essay briefly outlines some of our reasons for holding this position.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plato’s Legacy: Alive and Well\",\"authors\":\"Mark E Jonas, Yoshiaki Nakazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jopedu/qhad047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this essay, we outline the central thesis of our recent book: A Platonic Theory of Moral Education: Cultivating Virtue in Contemporary Democratic Classrooms. We argue that the ethical, epistemological, political, and metaphysical doctrines typically attributed to Plato are not doctrines Plato holds, or at least are not doctrines that he holds in the way he is interpreted to have done. We claim that if we understand Plato’s relationship to these supposed doctrines better, we would discover that Plato’s views are not wildly implausible or ill-suited for contemporary democracies and the schooling they provide for their children. Rather, they are plausible and well-suited to contemporary democratic education. This essay briefly outlines some of our reasons for holding this position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中，我们概述了我们新书的中心论点:柏拉图式的道德教育理论:在当代民主课堂中培养美德。我们认为，柏拉图的伦理，认识论，政治和形而上学的教义，并不是柏拉图所持有的教义，或者至少不是他所持有的那种被解释为他所做过的教义。我们认为，如果我们更好地理解柏拉图与这些假想的学说之间的关系，我们就会发现柏拉图的观点并非完全不可信或不适合当代民主国家及其为子女提供的教育。相反，它们是可信的，非常适合当代民主教育。这篇文章简要概述了我们持有这一立场的一些原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Plato’s Legacy: Alive and Well

Abstract In this essay, we outline the central thesis of our recent book: A Platonic Theory of Moral Education: Cultivating Virtue in Contemporary Democratic Classrooms. We argue that the ethical, epistemological, political, and metaphysical doctrines typically attributed to Plato are not doctrines Plato holds, or at least are not doctrines that he holds in the way he is interpreted to have done. We claim that if we understand Plato’s relationship to these supposed doctrines better, we would discover that Plato’s views are not wildly implausible or ill-suited for contemporary democracies and the schooling they provide for their children. Rather, they are plausible and well-suited to contemporary democratic education. This essay briefly outlines some of our reasons for holding this position.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Philosophy of Education publishes articles representing a wide variety of philosophical traditions. They vary from examination of fundamental philosophical issues in their connection with education, to detailed critical engagement with current educational practice or policy from a philosophical point of view. The journal aims to promote rigorous thinking on educational matters and to identify and criticise the ideological forces shaping education. Ethical, political, aesthetic and epistemological dimensions of educational theory are amongst those covered.