第一印象动机知觉:论被试外显和内隐动机倾向的相关性

Pauline Bassler, Michael Dufner, Jaap Denissen
{"title":"第一印象动机知觉:论被试外显和内隐动机倾向的相关性","authors":"Pauline Bassler, Michael Dufner, Jaap Denissen","doi":"10.5964/ps.10753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p xmlns=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1\">When people judge the motive dispositions of unacquainted others, are their judgments accurate representations of the targets’ explicit motives, their implicit motives, or both? To address this question, we assessed target persons’ explicit motives via self-report and their implicit motives via a Picture Story Exercise as well as two recently developed affective contingency-based measures. Targets were then filmed during a short, casual conversation. The recordings were shown to thirty unacquainted observers who judged targets’ affiliation, power and achievement motives. For all three motives, observer ratings were linked to explicit motives. For the affiliation and achievement domains, ratings were also linked to implicit motives. We further investigated whether the extent of congruence between observer ratings and motive ratings would depend on information modality, this was not the case. The findings thus indicate that both explicit and implicit motives are relevant for observer judgments, but that these effects are not modality-specific.","PeriodicalId":74421,"journal":{"name":"Personality science","volume":"109 47","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motive perception at first impressions: On the relevance of targets’ explicit and implicit motive dispositions\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Bassler, Michael Dufner, Jaap Denissen\",\"doi\":\"10.5964/ps.10753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p xmlns=\\\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1\\\">When people judge the motive dispositions of unacquainted others, are their judgments accurate representations of the targets’ explicit motives, their implicit motives, or both? To address this question, we assessed target persons’ explicit motives via self-report and their implicit motives via a Picture Story Exercise as well as two recently developed affective contingency-based measures. Targets were then filmed during a short, casual conversation. The recordings were shown to thirty unacquainted observers who judged targets’ affiliation, power and achievement motives. For all three motives, observer ratings were linked to explicit motives. For the affiliation and achievement domains, ratings were also linked to implicit motives. We further investigated whether the extent of congruence between observer ratings and motive ratings would depend on information modality, this was not the case. The findings thus indicate that both explicit and implicit motives are relevant for observer judgments, but that these effects are not modality-specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality science\",\"volume\":\"109 47\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.10753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.10753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当人们判断不认识的人的动机倾向时,他们的判断是准确地反映了目标的显性动机、隐性动机,还是两者兼而有之?为了解决这个问题,我们通过自我报告来评估目标人的外显动机,通过图片故事练习来评估目标人的内隐动机,以及最近开发的两种基于情感权变的测量方法。然后拍摄目标在一个简短的,随意的谈话。这些录音被展示给30个不认识的观察者,让他们判断目标的隶属关系、权力和成就动机。对于这三种动机,观察者的评价都与显性动机有关。对于隶属关系和成就领域,评分也与内隐动机有关。我们进一步调查了观察者评分和动机评分之间的一致性程度是否取决于信息模态,结果表明并非如此。因此,研究结果表明,外显动机和内隐动机都与观察者的判断有关,但这些影响并不是特定于模式的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motive perception at first impressions: On the relevance of targets’ explicit and implicit motive dispositions

When people judge the motive dispositions of unacquainted others, are their judgments accurate representations of the targets’ explicit motives, their implicit motives, or both? To address this question, we assessed target persons’ explicit motives via self-report and their implicit motives via a Picture Story Exercise as well as two recently developed affective contingency-based measures. Targets were then filmed during a short, casual conversation. The recordings were shown to thirty unacquainted observers who judged targets’ affiliation, power and achievement motives. For all three motives, observer ratings were linked to explicit motives. For the affiliation and achievement domains, ratings were also linked to implicit motives. We further investigated whether the extent of congruence between observer ratings and motive ratings would depend on information modality, this was not the case. The findings thus indicate that both explicit and implicit motives are relevant for observer judgments, but that these effects are not modality-specific.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信