还原真相:公民满意度的锚定效应与去偏干预

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Jinfeng Zhang, Zengqiang Qin, Jun Cen, Bingsheng Liu
{"title":"还原真相:公民满意度的锚定效应与去偏干预","authors":"Jinfeng Zhang, Zengqiang Qin, Jun Cen, Bingsheng Liu","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2023.2279068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAlthough expectations have emerged as a prominent research theme in public administration, little is known about whether and how expectations affect citizen satisfaction. We investigated the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping citizen satisfaction, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens. Specifically, we examined (1) the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels; (2) the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on expectations and satisfaction; and (3) the effectiveness of debiasing education in mitigating anchoring effects. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizens’ expectations and satisfaction. Debiasing education is effective in mitigating anchoring effects on expectations but not on satisfaction. These findings integrated cognitive bias into the expectancy disconfirmation model to a better understanding of citizen satisfaction.BRIEF ABSTRACTIn this article, the authors focus on investigating the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping levels of citizen satisfaction. To achieve this, the study (1) examined the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens; (2) tested the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on satisfaction; and (3) employed debiasing education to mitigate anchoring effects on satisfaction. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizen satisfaction. Debias education is effective in mitigating bias on expectations but does not equally address issues related to satisfaction levels. These findings contribute to the cross-national generalizability of the expectancy disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction literature.Keywords: Anchoring effectscitizen satisfactionexpectancy disconfirmation modelnormative expectationsurvey experiment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. 72134002]; Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education under Grant [No. 21JZD029]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant [No. 2019CDJSK01PY04, 2022CDJSKJC23]; National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. T221101034]; and Chongqing Social Science Planning Talents Plan Project [No. 2021YC019].Notes on contributorsJinfeng ZhangJinfeng Zhang is an associate professor in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research focuses on nudging citizens’ behavior, citizen satisfaction, and behavioral public administration.Zengqiang QinZengqiang Qin is an associate professor in the School of Public Administration at the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China. His research interests include behavioral public administration, citizen expectations, and experimental research methods.Jun CenJun Cen is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research interests include citizen satisfaction and expectations about public services.Bingsheng LiuBingsheng Liu is a professor in the School of Economics and Management at Hebei University of Technology, China. His research focuses on social governance and project management.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoring the Truth: Anchoring Effects and Debiasing Interventions on Citizen Satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Jinfeng Zhang, Zengqiang Qin, Jun Cen, Bingsheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15309576.2023.2279068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractAlthough expectations have emerged as a prominent research theme in public administration, little is known about whether and how expectations affect citizen satisfaction. We investigated the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping citizen satisfaction, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens. Specifically, we examined (1) the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels; (2) the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on expectations and satisfaction; and (3) the effectiveness of debiasing education in mitigating anchoring effects. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizens’ expectations and satisfaction. Debiasing education is effective in mitigating anchoring effects on expectations but not on satisfaction. These findings integrated cognitive bias into the expectancy disconfirmation model to a better understanding of citizen satisfaction.BRIEF ABSTRACTIn this article, the authors focus on investigating the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping levels of citizen satisfaction. To achieve this, the study (1) examined the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens; (2) tested the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on satisfaction; and (3) employed debiasing education to mitigate anchoring effects on satisfaction. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizen satisfaction. Debias education is effective in mitigating bias on expectations but does not equally address issues related to satisfaction levels. These findings contribute to the cross-national generalizability of the expectancy disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction literature.Keywords: Anchoring effectscitizen satisfactionexpectancy disconfirmation modelnormative expectationsurvey experiment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. 72134002]; Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education under Grant [No. 21JZD029]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant [No. 2019CDJSK01PY04, 2022CDJSKJC23]; National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. T221101034]; and Chongqing Social Science Planning Talents Plan Project [No. 2021YC019].Notes on contributorsJinfeng ZhangJinfeng Zhang is an associate professor in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research focuses on nudging citizens’ behavior, citizen satisfaction, and behavioral public administration.Zengqiang QinZengqiang Qin is an associate professor in the School of Public Administration at the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China. His research interests include behavioral public administration, citizen expectations, and experimental research methods.Jun CenJun Cen is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research interests include citizen satisfaction and expectations about public services.Bingsheng LiuBingsheng Liu is a professor in the School of Economics and Management at Hebei University of Technology, China. His research focuses on social governance and project management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2279068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2279068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要期望已成为公共管理领域的一个重要研究主题,但人们对期望是否影响公民满意度以及如何影响公民满意度却知之甚少。我们利用一项涉及735名中国公民的调查实验,调查了期望在塑造公民满意度方面的锚定效应。具体而言,我们研究了(1)公民对服务应该是什么的规范性期望对其满意度水平的影响;(2)数值锚对期望和满意度的锚定效应;(3)消偏教育在缓解锚定效应中的有效性。研究结果显示,公民的规范性期望与其满意度水平呈负相关,突出了锚定效应对公民期望和满意度的影响。去偏见教育可以有效地减轻对期望的锚定效应,但不能减轻对满意度的锚定效应。这些发现将认知偏差整合到期望不确认模型中,以更好地理解公民满意度。摘要在这篇文章中,作者着重研究了期望在塑造公民满意度水平方面的锚定效应。为了实现这一目标,本研究(1)利用一项涉及735名中国公民的调查实验,考察了公民对服务应该是什么的规范性期望对其满意度水平的影响;(2)检验了数字锚对满意度的锚定效应;(3)采用去偏教育来缓解锚定效应对满意度的影响。研究结果显示,公民的规范性期望与其满意度水平呈负相关,突出了锚定效应对公民满意度的影响。消除偏见教育在减轻对期望的偏见方面是有效的,但不能平等地解决与满意度有关的问题。这些发现有助于期望不确认模型和公民满意度文献的跨国推广。关键词:锚定效应;公民满意度;期望失定模型;规范性期望;调查实验;本研究受国家自然科学基金资助[No. 1];72134002);教育部哲学社会科学研究重点项目[No. 1];21 jzd029];中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目[j];2019 cdjsk01py04 2022 cdjskjc23];国家自然科学基金资助项目[No. 1];T221101034];重庆市社会科学规划人才计划项目[2021 yc019]。作者简介张金峰,重庆大学公共政策与管理学院副教授。她的研究重点是推动公民行为、公民满意度和行为公共管理。秦增强,西南财经大学公共管理学院副教授。主要研究方向为行为公共管理、公民期望、实验研究方法等。岑军,重庆大学公共政策与管理学院博士研究生。她的研究兴趣包括公民满意度和对公共服务的期望。刘炳生,河北工业大学经济管理学院教授。主要研究方向为社会治理和项目管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restoring the Truth: Anchoring Effects and Debiasing Interventions on Citizen Satisfaction
AbstractAlthough expectations have emerged as a prominent research theme in public administration, little is known about whether and how expectations affect citizen satisfaction. We investigated the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping citizen satisfaction, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens. Specifically, we examined (1) the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels; (2) the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on expectations and satisfaction; and (3) the effectiveness of debiasing education in mitigating anchoring effects. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizens’ expectations and satisfaction. Debiasing education is effective in mitigating anchoring effects on expectations but not on satisfaction. These findings integrated cognitive bias into the expectancy disconfirmation model to a better understanding of citizen satisfaction.BRIEF ABSTRACTIn this article, the authors focus on investigating the anchoring effects of expectations in shaping levels of citizen satisfaction. To achieve this, the study (1) examined the influence of citizens’ normative expectations of what services should be on their satisfaction levels, utilizing a survey experiment involving 735 Chinese citizens; (2) tested the anchoring effects that result from numerical anchors on satisfaction; and (3) employed debiasing education to mitigate anchoring effects on satisfaction. The findings reveal a negative correlation between citizens’ normative expectations and their satisfaction levels, highlighting the influence of anchoring effects on citizen satisfaction. Debias education is effective in mitigating bias on expectations but does not equally address issues related to satisfaction levels. These findings contribute to the cross-national generalizability of the expectancy disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction literature.Keywords: Anchoring effectscitizen satisfactionexpectancy disconfirmation modelnormative expectationsurvey experiment Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. 72134002]; Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education under Grant [No. 21JZD029]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant [No. 2019CDJSK01PY04, 2022CDJSKJC23]; National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [No. T221101034]; and Chongqing Social Science Planning Talents Plan Project [No. 2021YC019].Notes on contributorsJinfeng ZhangJinfeng Zhang is an associate professor in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research focuses on nudging citizens’ behavior, citizen satisfaction, and behavioral public administration.Zengqiang QinZengqiang Qin is an associate professor in the School of Public Administration at the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China. His research interests include behavioral public administration, citizen expectations, and experimental research methods.Jun CenJun Cen is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Public Policy and Administration at Chongqing University, China. Her research interests include citizen satisfaction and expectations about public services.Bingsheng LiuBingsheng Liu is a professor in the School of Economics and Management at Hebei University of Technology, China. His research focuses on social governance and project management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
16.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信