cordex-sea模式模拟印度尼西亚雨季特征的性能评价

Akhmad Faqih, Alif Akbar Syafrianno, Supari Supari, Rini Hidayati
{"title":"cordex-sea模式模拟印度尼西亚雨季特征的性能评价","authors":"Akhmad Faqih, Alif Akbar Syafrianno, Supari Supari, Rini Hidayati","doi":"10.31172/jmg.v24i1.965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia's climate is known to be challenging to adequately simulate by climate models because of the complexity of the weather system and sea-land distribution. Model evaluation is essential to measure confidence in the model results. This study evaluates the performance of the CORDEX-SEA model in simulating monthly rainfall patterns and the characteristics of seasonal rainfall, i.e., pattern, timing, length, and intensity, in Indonesia during 1986-2005. The performance of weighted (WMME) and unweighted ensemble methods are also calculated. Corrected CHIRPS data with similar seasonal patterns with point observation data is used as reference data to evaluate models. Percentage of the agreement of seasonal patterns between models and observation, FAR, and POD values were used to assess the model's ability to simulate seasonal patterns. WMME has the best seasonal patterns agreement with observation, 67% of all grids. The best model performance is shown by monsoonal patterns, with a POD value of 83% by WMME. Otherwise, all models could not describe an anti-monsoonal pattern, with a small POD (0-33%) and a high FAR (60-100%). In simulating the wet season on climatological, annual, and annual mean scales, both MMEs have similar performance and are better than individual models, with WMME performing best. However, on an annual scale, the yearly wet season produced by all models tends to approach its climatology value, making it less reliable in extreme years. Most models have higher daily and monthly rainfall than observation. In conclusion, the weighted ensemble method describes Indonesia's rainy season well, thus providing a reasonable basis for further research in climate projection analysis.","PeriodicalId":32347,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF THE CORDEX-SEA MODELS PERFORMANCE IN SIMULATING CHARACTERISTICS OF WET SEASON IN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Akhmad Faqih, Alif Akbar Syafrianno, Supari Supari, Rini Hidayati\",\"doi\":\"10.31172/jmg.v24i1.965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia's climate is known to be challenging to adequately simulate by climate models because of the complexity of the weather system and sea-land distribution. Model evaluation is essential to measure confidence in the model results. This study evaluates the performance of the CORDEX-SEA model in simulating monthly rainfall patterns and the characteristics of seasonal rainfall, i.e., pattern, timing, length, and intensity, in Indonesia during 1986-2005. The performance of weighted (WMME) and unweighted ensemble methods are also calculated. Corrected CHIRPS data with similar seasonal patterns with point observation data is used as reference data to evaluate models. Percentage of the agreement of seasonal patterns between models and observation, FAR, and POD values were used to assess the model's ability to simulate seasonal patterns. WMME has the best seasonal patterns agreement with observation, 67% of all grids. The best model performance is shown by monsoonal patterns, with a POD value of 83% by WMME. Otherwise, all models could not describe an anti-monsoonal pattern, with a small POD (0-33%) and a high FAR (60-100%). In simulating the wet season on climatological, annual, and annual mean scales, both MMEs have similar performance and are better than individual models, with WMME performing best. However, on an annual scale, the yearly wet season produced by all models tends to approach its climatology value, making it less reliable in extreme years. Most models have higher daily and monthly rainfall than observation. In conclusion, the weighted ensemble method describes Indonesia's rainy season well, thus providing a reasonable basis for further research in climate projection analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v24i1.965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v24i1.965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,由于天气系统和海陆分布的复杂性,气候模式很难充分模拟印度尼西亚的气候。模型评价对于测量模型结果的置信度至关重要。本研究评估了CORDEX-SEA模式在模拟1986-2005年印度尼西亚月降雨模式和季节性降雨特征(即模式、时间、长度和强度)方面的表现。计算了加权集成方法和非加权集成方法的性能。校正后的CHIRPS数据与点观测数据具有相似的季节模式,作为参考数据对模型进行评价。利用模式与观测值之间季节模式一致性的百分比、FAR值和POD值来评估模式模拟季节模式的能力。WMME的季节模式与观测结果的一致性最好,占所有网格的67%。季风模式表现最好,WMME的POD值为83%。否则,所有模式都不能描述反季风型,POD小(0-33%),FAR高(60-100%)。在气候、年和年平均尺度上模拟雨季时,两种模型的模拟结果相似且优于单个模型,其中WMME表现最好。然而,在年尺度上,所有模式产生的年雨季都趋向于接近其气候学值,因此在极端年份的可靠性较低。大多数模式的日和月降雨量高于观测值。综上所述,加权集合法较好地描述了印度尼西亚的雨季,为气候预测分析的进一步研究提供了合理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF THE CORDEX-SEA MODELS PERFORMANCE IN SIMULATING CHARACTERISTICS OF WET SEASON IN INDONESIA
Indonesia's climate is known to be challenging to adequately simulate by climate models because of the complexity of the weather system and sea-land distribution. Model evaluation is essential to measure confidence in the model results. This study evaluates the performance of the CORDEX-SEA model in simulating monthly rainfall patterns and the characteristics of seasonal rainfall, i.e., pattern, timing, length, and intensity, in Indonesia during 1986-2005. The performance of weighted (WMME) and unweighted ensemble methods are also calculated. Corrected CHIRPS data with similar seasonal patterns with point observation data is used as reference data to evaluate models. Percentage of the agreement of seasonal patterns between models and observation, FAR, and POD values were used to assess the model's ability to simulate seasonal patterns. WMME has the best seasonal patterns agreement with observation, 67% of all grids. The best model performance is shown by monsoonal patterns, with a POD value of 83% by WMME. Otherwise, all models could not describe an anti-monsoonal pattern, with a small POD (0-33%) and a high FAR (60-100%). In simulating the wet season on climatological, annual, and annual mean scales, both MMEs have similar performance and are better than individual models, with WMME performing best. However, on an annual scale, the yearly wet season produced by all models tends to approach its climatology value, making it less reliable in extreme years. Most models have higher daily and monthly rainfall than observation. In conclusion, the weighted ensemble method describes Indonesia's rainy season well, thus providing a reasonable basis for further research in climate projection analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信