{"title":"红树林沉积物根际细菌宏基因组分析的有效DNA提取方法","authors":"Siti Maysaroh, Meutia Samira Ismet, Beginer Subhan, Rita Andini, Enny Rimita Sembiring, Nurlita Putri Anggraini","doi":"10.13170/depik.12.2.32850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mangrove, Rhizophora mucronata, grows in the intertidal area, which contains much organic matter and varying salinity. The organic matter content is influenced by the bacterial community that inhabits the ecosystem, but information regarding the bacterial community, especially in the mangrove root system, is not widely available. There are several challenges in completing this information, one of which is that the method used is still in a conventional form. Developments in environmental DNA analysis can support and complement this information. However, this method must be optimized because the organic matter content and salt variations affect the extraction results. Thus, this study aimed to determine the optimal approach for extracting bacterial DNA from mangrove sediments. The analysis used two methodologies: manual DNA extraction techniques based on buffer modification and DNA extraction kits. There were four different treatments, namely the soil DNA isolation plus kit (M1), the fecal / soil microbial quick-DNA miniprep kit (M2), glass powder with charcoal (M3), and glass powder with skimmed milk (M4). DNA samples were obtained from each method and assessed for concentration and purity using a nanodrop. In addition, the resulting DNA's quality was analyzed using 1.5% agarose. The results obtained were in the M2 treatment, which showed optimal results compared to the others. M2 uses a bead-based beating and spin column method to achieve optimal DNA concentration through high molecular weight. The DNA obtained was also protein-free, and several samples were contaminated with humic acid, namely KL.S1, KL.S4, and T7.S4.Keywords:Bacteria 16SBead beatingDNA ExtractionSedimentSpin column","PeriodicalId":30450,"journal":{"name":"Depik Jurnal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective DNA extraction method for metagenomic analysis of rhizosphere bacteria from mangrove sediments\",\"authors\":\"Siti Maysaroh, Meutia Samira Ismet, Beginer Subhan, Rita Andini, Enny Rimita Sembiring, Nurlita Putri Anggraini\",\"doi\":\"10.13170/depik.12.2.32850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mangrove, Rhizophora mucronata, grows in the intertidal area, which contains much organic matter and varying salinity. The organic matter content is influenced by the bacterial community that inhabits the ecosystem, but information regarding the bacterial community, especially in the mangrove root system, is not widely available. There are several challenges in completing this information, one of which is that the method used is still in a conventional form. Developments in environmental DNA analysis can support and complement this information. However, this method must be optimized because the organic matter content and salt variations affect the extraction results. Thus, this study aimed to determine the optimal approach for extracting bacterial DNA from mangrove sediments. The analysis used two methodologies: manual DNA extraction techniques based on buffer modification and DNA extraction kits. There were four different treatments, namely the soil DNA isolation plus kit (M1), the fecal / soil microbial quick-DNA miniprep kit (M2), glass powder with charcoal (M3), and glass powder with skimmed milk (M4). DNA samples were obtained from each method and assessed for concentration and purity using a nanodrop. In addition, the resulting DNA's quality was analyzed using 1.5% agarose. The results obtained were in the M2 treatment, which showed optimal results compared to the others. M2 uses a bead-based beating and spin column method to achieve optimal DNA concentration through high molecular weight. The DNA obtained was also protein-free, and several samples were contaminated with humic acid, namely KL.S1, KL.S4, and T7.S4.Keywords:Bacteria 16SBead beatingDNA ExtractionSedimentSpin column\",\"PeriodicalId\":30450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depik Jurnal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depik Jurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.12.2.32850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depik Jurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.12.2.32850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
红树林(Rhizophora mucronata)生长在潮间带,有机质含量高,盐度变化大。有机物质的含量受到生态系统中细菌群落的影响,但关于细菌群落的信息,特别是红树林根系中的细菌群落的信息并不广泛。完成这些信息有几个挑战,其中之一是所使用的方法仍然是传统的形式。环境DNA分析的发展可以支持和补充这一信息。但是,由于有机质含量和盐的变化会影响提取结果,因此必须对该方法进行优化。因此,本研究旨在确定从红树林沉积物中提取细菌DNA的最佳方法。分析使用两种方法:基于缓冲修饰的人工DNA提取技术和DNA提取试剂盒。采用土壤DNA分离加试剂盒(M1)、粪便/土壤微生物快速DNA预备试剂盒(M2)、炭化玻璃粉(M3)和脱脂乳玻璃粉(M4) 4种不同处理。从每种方法中获得DNA样本,并使用纳米滴评估浓度和纯度。此外,用1.5%琼脂糖分析所得DNA的质量。结果表明,与其他处理相比,M2处理效果最佳。M2采用基于珠状跳动和旋转柱的方法,通过高分子量来达到最佳的DNA浓度。获得的DNA也不含蛋白质,有几个样品被腐植酸污染,分别是kl1 . s1、kl4 . s4和T7.S4。关键词:细菌;16SBead; dna
Effective DNA extraction method for metagenomic analysis of rhizosphere bacteria from mangrove sediments
Mangrove, Rhizophora mucronata, grows in the intertidal area, which contains much organic matter and varying salinity. The organic matter content is influenced by the bacterial community that inhabits the ecosystem, but information regarding the bacterial community, especially in the mangrove root system, is not widely available. There are several challenges in completing this information, one of which is that the method used is still in a conventional form. Developments in environmental DNA analysis can support and complement this information. However, this method must be optimized because the organic matter content and salt variations affect the extraction results. Thus, this study aimed to determine the optimal approach for extracting bacterial DNA from mangrove sediments. The analysis used two methodologies: manual DNA extraction techniques based on buffer modification and DNA extraction kits. There were four different treatments, namely the soil DNA isolation plus kit (M1), the fecal / soil microbial quick-DNA miniprep kit (M2), glass powder with charcoal (M3), and glass powder with skimmed milk (M4). DNA samples were obtained from each method and assessed for concentration and purity using a nanodrop. In addition, the resulting DNA's quality was analyzed using 1.5% agarose. The results obtained were in the M2 treatment, which showed optimal results compared to the others. M2 uses a bead-based beating and spin column method to achieve optimal DNA concentration through high molecular weight. The DNA obtained was also protein-free, and several samples were contaminated with humic acid, namely KL.S1, KL.S4, and T7.S4.Keywords:Bacteria 16SBead beatingDNA ExtractionSedimentSpin column