伏尔加森林地区中欧冲动的年表:法提亚诺沃和阿巴舍沃文化

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.24852/pa2023.3.45.84.94

Stanislav A. Grigoriev

{"title":"伏尔加森林地区中欧冲动的年表:法提亚诺沃和阿巴舍沃文化","authors":"Stanislav A. Grigoriev","doi":"10.24852/pa2023.3.45.84.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a difference in chronology based on radiocarbon dating and historical dates associated with Near Eastern written sources. With the introduction of AMS dating, this gap has become smaller, but has not disappeared. However, the application of Bayesian statistics to this dating often produces dates corresponding to historical and dendrochronology. This allows us to assume that as the radiocarbon method improves, its results will coincide with the historical chronology. Comparison of materials from forest cultures of Eastern Europe, the Fatyanovo and Abashevo, allows us to connect them with the chronology of Central Europe, and, thereby, to determine the lower boundaries of these cultures within the dendrochronology of the Alpine zone. As a result, younger dates have been obtained for them than the results of radiocarbon dating give: after the middle of the 27th century BC for the Fatyanovo culture and ca. 20th century BC for the Abashevo.","PeriodicalId":37438,"journal":{"name":"Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronology of Central European Impulses in the Volga Forest Region: Fatyanovo and Abashevo Cultures\",\"authors\":\"Stanislav A. Grigoriev\",\"doi\":\"10.24852/pa2023.3.45.84.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a difference in chronology based on radiocarbon dating and historical dates associated with Near Eastern written sources. With the introduction of AMS dating, this gap has become smaller, but has not disappeared. However, the application of Bayesian statistics to this dating often produces dates corresponding to historical and dendrochronology. This allows us to assume that as the radiocarbon method improves, its results will coincide with the historical chronology. Comparison of materials from forest cultures of Eastern Europe, the Fatyanovo and Abashevo, allows us to connect them with the chronology of Central Europe, and, thereby, to determine the lower boundaries of these cultures within the dendrochronology of the Alpine zone. As a result, younger dates have been obtained for them than the results of radiocarbon dating give: after the middle of the 27th century BC for the Fatyanovo culture and ca. 20th century BC for the Abashevo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2023.3.45.84.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2023.3.45.84.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

基于放射性碳定年法的年表与与近东书面资料相关的历史日期存在差异。随着AMS测年的引入，这一差距缩小了，但并没有消失。然而，贝叶斯统计在这种年代测定中的应用经常产生与历史和树木年代学相对应的日期。这使我们可以假设，随着放射性碳方法的改进，其结果将与历史年表一致。对来自东欧的森林文化，法提亚诺沃和阿巴舍沃的材料进行比较，使我们能够将它们与中欧的年代学联系起来，从而确定这些文化在高山地区树木年代学中的下限。因此，他们得到的年代比放射性碳定年的结果更年轻:法提亚诺沃文化的年代是公元前27世纪中叶之后，阿巴舍沃文化的年代是公元前20世纪左右。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Chronology of Central European Impulses in the Volga Forest Region: Fatyanovo and Abashevo Cultures

There is a difference in chronology based on radiocarbon dating and historical dates associated with Near Eastern written sources. With the introduction of AMS dating, this gap has become smaller, but has not disappeared. However, the application of Bayesian statistics to this dating often produces dates corresponding to historical and dendrochronology. This allows us to assume that as the radiocarbon method improves, its results will coincide with the historical chronology. Comparison of materials from forest cultures of Eastern Europe, the Fatyanovo and Abashevo, allows us to connect them with the chronology of Central Europe, and, thereby, to determine the lower boundaries of these cultures within the dendrochronology of the Alpine zone. As a result, younger dates have been obtained for them than the results of radiocarbon dating give: after the middle of the 27th century BC for the Fatyanovo culture and ca. 20th century BC for the Abashevo.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal is a good opportunity for a wide circle of archaeologists, historians, ethnologists and interdisciplinary researchers to participate in discussions and publish their works. The journal focuses on reconstruction and interpretation of cultural-historical processes on the vast spaces in the Volga region, the Ural and the North-Caspian region, which used to be, at times, a cross-point between Europe and Asia, not just geographically, but also culturally. These territories used to generate large-scale changes in the most remote geographic areas. A growing international attention to this exceptional macro-region of the ancient Eurasia makes the Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya journal a reputable platform, where specialists from different countries – from Finland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania and Moldova to Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Mongolia – to exchange their opinions and ideas.