吹气球运动和刺激肺活量测定在胸插管患者中的效果

Patil P
{"title":"吹气球运动和刺激肺活量测定在胸插管患者中的效果","authors":"Patil P","doi":"10.24321/2278.2044.202350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study was done to compare the impact ofballoon-blowing exercises (BBE) with incentive spirometry in chestintubated patients of the older age group and to compare their efficacyin improving chest expansion as well as peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).Methodology: A sample size of 30 patients was calculated. 15 participantswere allotted to Group A and 15 to Group B with the simple randomsampling technique. Data were obtained at the beginning of the sessionand at the end of the 4th week post-exercise session using an inchtape and a peak flow meter. Group A carried out regular respiratoryphysiotherapy and incentive spirometry whereas, Group B carried outregular respiratory physiotherapy and BBE in chest intubated patients.Results: The results showed that the post-test statistical values in theexperimental group were greater than those in the control group,implying that routine physiotherapy treatment along with BBE has asignificant difference in the positive effect on outcome measures inthe study population.Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the results obtained, the presentstudy concluded that balloon-blowing exercises and regular chestphysiotherapy treatment were more effective in improving chestexpansion and PEFR as compared to incentive spirometry and respiratoryphysiotherapy to overcome postoperative pulmonary complicationsin chest intubated patients of the older age group. How to cite this article:Darekar S, Poonam P. Effectiveness of BalloonblowingExercises and Incentive Spirometry inChest Intubated Patients.Chettinad Health CityMed J. 2023;12(3):45-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350","PeriodicalId":276735,"journal":{"name":"Chettinad Health City Medical Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Balloon-blowing Exercises and Incentive Spirometry in Chest Intubated Patients\",\"authors\":\"Patil P\",\"doi\":\"10.24321/2278.2044.202350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The present study was done to compare the impact ofballoon-blowing exercises (BBE) with incentive spirometry in chestintubated patients of the older age group and to compare their efficacyin improving chest expansion as well as peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).Methodology: A sample size of 30 patients was calculated. 15 participantswere allotted to Group A and 15 to Group B with the simple randomsampling technique. Data were obtained at the beginning of the sessionand at the end of the 4th week post-exercise session using an inchtape and a peak flow meter. Group A carried out regular respiratoryphysiotherapy and incentive spirometry whereas, Group B carried outregular respiratory physiotherapy and BBE in chest intubated patients.Results: The results showed that the post-test statistical values in theexperimental group were greater than those in the control group,implying that routine physiotherapy treatment along with BBE has asignificant difference in the positive effect on outcome measures inthe study population.Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the results obtained, the presentstudy concluded that balloon-blowing exercises and regular chestphysiotherapy treatment were more effective in improving chestexpansion and PEFR as compared to incentive spirometry and respiratoryphysiotherapy to overcome postoperative pulmonary complicationsin chest intubated patients of the older age group. How to cite this article:Darekar S, Poonam P. Effectiveness of BalloonblowingExercises and Incentive Spirometry inChest Intubated Patients.Chettinad Health CityMed J. 2023;12(3):45-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350\",\"PeriodicalId\":276735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chettinad Health City Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chettinad Health City Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chettinad Health City Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较吹气球运动(BBE)与刺激肺活量测定法对老年胸腔插管患者的影响,并比较它们在改善胸扩张和呼气峰流速(PEFR)方面的效果。方法:计算30例患者的样本量。采用简单随机抽样方法,将15名参与者分配到A组,15名参与者分配到B组。在运动开始时和运动后第4周结束时,使用英寸胶带和峰值流量计获得数据。A组患者给予常规呼吸物理治疗和刺激肺活量测定,B组患者给予超常规呼吸物理治疗和BBE治疗。结果:实验组的检验后统计值大于对照组,说明常规物理治疗联合BBE治疗在研究人群中对结局指标的积极作用有显著差异。结论:通过对所得结果的分析,本研究认为,在老年胸腔插管患者中,吹气球运动和常规胸腔物理治疗在改善胸腔扩张和PEFR方面比激励肺活量测定和呼吸物理治疗更有效,以克服术后肺部并发症。本文来源:Darekar S, Poonam P.充气运动和肺量测量在胸腔插管患者中的有效性。中国卫生与城市医学杂志,2013;12(3):45-49。DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Balloon-blowing Exercises and Incentive Spirometry in Chest Intubated Patients
Objective: The present study was done to compare the impact ofballoon-blowing exercises (BBE) with incentive spirometry in chestintubated patients of the older age group and to compare their efficacyin improving chest expansion as well as peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).Methodology: A sample size of 30 patients was calculated. 15 participantswere allotted to Group A and 15 to Group B with the simple randomsampling technique. Data were obtained at the beginning of the sessionand at the end of the 4th week post-exercise session using an inchtape and a peak flow meter. Group A carried out regular respiratoryphysiotherapy and incentive spirometry whereas, Group B carried outregular respiratory physiotherapy and BBE in chest intubated patients.Results: The results showed that the post-test statistical values in theexperimental group were greater than those in the control group,implying that routine physiotherapy treatment along with BBE has asignificant difference in the positive effect on outcome measures inthe study population.Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the results obtained, the presentstudy concluded that balloon-blowing exercises and regular chestphysiotherapy treatment were more effective in improving chestexpansion and PEFR as compared to incentive spirometry and respiratoryphysiotherapy to overcome postoperative pulmonary complicationsin chest intubated patients of the older age group. How to cite this article:Darekar S, Poonam P. Effectiveness of BalloonblowingExercises and Incentive Spirometry inChest Intubated Patients.Chettinad Health CityMed J. 2023;12(3):45-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202350
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信