伊斯兰宗教大学生物系学生主体性认知课程内容的探讨

Pontiara Pontiara, Dharma Ferry, Albertos Damni
{"title":"伊斯兰宗教大学生物系学生主体性认知课程内容的探讨","authors":"Pontiara Pontiara, Dharma Ferry, Albertos Damni","doi":"10.22437/biodik.v9i3.28939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual interpretations of specific phenomena exhibit a wide range of variations. Some consider higher education to be of utmost importance, while others assert that it is merely a financial burden. Similar perspectives apply to the comparison between science and religion. These interpretations are influenced by the individual's background conducting the assessment and the specific context applied in that evaluation. Likewise, within the context of academic coursework, there is a diversity of opinions regarding the level of difficulty, often dependent on the student's understanding and subjective perspective of the course. This study aims to comprehend and analyse how students majoring in Biology subjectively interpret and perceive their Biology courses. The research employs a qualitative approach using the Grounded Theory methodology. The sample consists of 40 students selected through theoretical sampling. Data collection is conducted via a Google Form-based questionnaire. Some perceive introductory Biology courses as relatively easy, while courses involving calculations are often regarded as the most challenging","PeriodicalId":486404,"journal":{"name":"Biodik: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan biologi","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Student Subjectivity in Perceiving Courses Content in the Biology Department at an Islamic Religious University\",\"authors\":\"Pontiara Pontiara, Dharma Ferry, Albertos Damni\",\"doi\":\"10.22437/biodik.v9i3.28939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individual interpretations of specific phenomena exhibit a wide range of variations. Some consider higher education to be of utmost importance, while others assert that it is merely a financial burden. Similar perspectives apply to the comparison between science and religion. These interpretations are influenced by the individual's background conducting the assessment and the specific context applied in that evaluation. Likewise, within the context of academic coursework, there is a diversity of opinions regarding the level of difficulty, often dependent on the student's understanding and subjective perspective of the course. This study aims to comprehend and analyse how students majoring in Biology subjectively interpret and perceive their Biology courses. The research employs a qualitative approach using the Grounded Theory methodology. The sample consists of 40 students selected through theoretical sampling. Data collection is conducted via a Google Form-based questionnaire. Some perceive introductory Biology courses as relatively easy, while courses involving calculations are often regarded as the most challenging\",\"PeriodicalId\":486404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodik: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan biologi\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodik: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan biologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v9i3.28939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodik: jurnal ilmiah pendidikan biologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/biodik.v9i3.28939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对特定现象的个人解释表现出很大的差异。一些人认为高等教育至关重要,而另一些人则认为高等教育只是一种经济负担。类似的观点也适用于科学与宗教之间的比较。这些解释受到进行评估的个人背景和评估中应用的具体背景的影响。同样,在学术课程的背景下,关于难度程度的意见也各不相同,这通常取决于学生对课程的理解和主观观点。本研究旨在了解和分析生物专业学生对生物课程的主观解读和感知。本研究采用扎根理论的定性方法。样本由40名通过理论抽样选出的学生组成。数据收集是通过基于Google表单的问卷进行的。有些人认为生物学入门课程相对容易,而涉及计算的课程通常被认为是最具挑战性的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Student Subjectivity in Perceiving Courses Content in the Biology Department at an Islamic Religious University
Individual interpretations of specific phenomena exhibit a wide range of variations. Some consider higher education to be of utmost importance, while others assert that it is merely a financial burden. Similar perspectives apply to the comparison between science and religion. These interpretations are influenced by the individual's background conducting the assessment and the specific context applied in that evaluation. Likewise, within the context of academic coursework, there is a diversity of opinions regarding the level of difficulty, often dependent on the student's understanding and subjective perspective of the course. This study aims to comprehend and analyse how students majoring in Biology subjectively interpret and perceive their Biology courses. The research employs a qualitative approach using the Grounded Theory methodology. The sample consists of 40 students selected through theoretical sampling. Data collection is conducted via a Google Form-based questionnaire. Some perceive introductory Biology courses as relatively easy, while courses involving calculations are often regarded as the most challenging
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信