微格教学科学:一项探索性研究

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Paul Howard‐Jones, Annabel Scott, Carolina Gordillo
{"title":"微格教学科学:一项探索性研究","authors":"Paul Howard‐Jones, Annabel Scott, Carolina Gordillo","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The teaching‐learning relationship in online microteaching was explored using mixed methods. Adults ( N = 40) alternated roles of “teacher” and “student” during a 15‐min language learning session. Video analysis using a context‐specific framework based on the science of learning revealed diversity in teaching approaches. Multiple regression revealed teaching behaviors that had been reasoned to build and consolidate knowledge contributed to learning but behaviors that had been reasoned to engage the student appeared to have a negative impact. No relationship was found between learning and participants' teaching experience (which was chiefly teaching second languages to children). Results demonstrate the complexity of teaching and its irreducibility to a set of prescriptive behaviors. They also suggest that a process‐based context‐specific analysis of online microteaching can provide a “bridging” tool for researchers and practitioners to address fundamental questions about teaching and so develop a “science of teaching”.","PeriodicalId":51595,"journal":{"name":"Mind Brain and Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Science of Microteaching and Learning: An Exploratory Study\",\"authors\":\"Paul Howard‐Jones, Annabel Scott, Carolina Gordillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mbe.12389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The teaching‐learning relationship in online microteaching was explored using mixed methods. Adults ( N = 40) alternated roles of “teacher” and “student” during a 15‐min language learning session. Video analysis using a context‐specific framework based on the science of learning revealed diversity in teaching approaches. Multiple regression revealed teaching behaviors that had been reasoned to build and consolidate knowledge contributed to learning but behaviors that had been reasoned to engage the student appeared to have a negative impact. No relationship was found between learning and participants' teaching experience (which was chiefly teaching second languages to children). Results demonstrate the complexity of teaching and its irreducibility to a set of prescriptive behaviors. They also suggest that a process‐based context‐specific analysis of online microteaching can provide a “bridging” tool for researchers and practitioners to address fundamental questions about teaching and so develop a “science of teaching”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12389\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Brain and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要采用混合方法对在线微教学中的教与学关系进行了探讨。在15分钟的语言学习过程中,40名成年人轮流扮演“老师”和“学生”的角色。使用基于学习科学的特定情境框架的视频分析揭示了教学方法的多样性。多元回归显示,被认为是建立和巩固知识的教学行为有助于学习,但被认为是吸引学生的行为似乎有负面影响。没有发现学习和参与者的教学经验(主要是教孩子第二语言)之间的关系。结果表明教学的复杂性及其不可简化为一组规定性行为。他们还建议,对在线微教学进行基于过程的具体情境分析,可以为研究人员和实践者提供一个“桥梁”工具,以解决有关教学的基本问题,从而发展一门“教学科学”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Science of Microteaching and Learning: An Exploratory Study
ABSTRACT The teaching‐learning relationship in online microteaching was explored using mixed methods. Adults ( N = 40) alternated roles of “teacher” and “student” during a 15‐min language learning session. Video analysis using a context‐specific framework based on the science of learning revealed diversity in teaching approaches. Multiple regression revealed teaching behaviors that had been reasoned to build and consolidate knowledge contributed to learning but behaviors that had been reasoned to engage the student appeared to have a negative impact. No relationship was found between learning and participants' teaching experience (which was chiefly teaching second languages to children). Results demonstrate the complexity of teaching and its irreducibility to a set of prescriptive behaviors. They also suggest that a process‐based context‐specific analysis of online microteaching can provide a “bridging” tool for researchers and practitioners to address fundamental questions about teaching and so develop a “science of teaching”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE), recognized as the 2007 Best New Journal in the Social Sciences & Humanities by the Association of American Publishers" Professional & Scholarly Publishing Division, provides a forum for the accessible presentation of basic and applied research on learning and development, including analyses from biology, cognitive science, and education. The journal grew out of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society"s mission to create a new field of mind, brain and education, with educators and researchers expertly collaborating in integrating the variety of fields connecting mind, brain, and education in research, theory, and/or practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信