大屠杀的不可再现性与创伤:聚焦于《灰烬归灰烬》和《苏菲的选择》

Ranhee Lee
{"title":"大屠杀的不可再现性与创伤:聚焦于《灰烬归灰烬》和《苏菲的选择》","authors":"Ranhee Lee","doi":"10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Holocaust survivors have ‘failed experience’ as a trauma, and whenever they remember Auschwitz, they live paralyzed by the shame of being human and of having survived alone. Due to the ‘unrepresentability’ of the Holocaust, their experience is ‘disrupted,’ and they are unable to express or talk about their past experiences. It is because the nature of their experiences is in no way covered by the terms and positions the symbolic order offers to them. These survivors live with the horrors of the Holocaust trauma, but are haunted by them. Thus, when they verbalize their experience, the form they dictate is ‘discursive.’ Even now, decades after the fall of the Nazis, the Holocaust is as vivid as it was yesterday because of literary works as ‘survivor testimonial literature’ and films dealing with the tragedy, a representative product of the ‘memory industry’, which is constantly replaying this nightmare. Among them, Harold Pinter’s Ashes to Ashes (1996) and Alan J. Pakula’s film Sophie’s Choice (1982) are evaluated as the most difficult and eerie examples. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the memories of the two heroines, which show the state of psychological dissociation caused by the trauma of the Holocaust in Ashes to Ashes and Sophie’s Choice, are converted into language. In these two works, the female protagonists only describe the Holocaust experience verbally rather than physically representing it, which makes it invisible and forces the audience to imagine the entire situation and thus consider that, although the way in which both works deal with the Holocaust is up to the author, it is up to us to properly see and accept the survivors through the history of memory.","PeriodicalId":479618,"journal":{"name":"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unrepresentability and Trauma of the Holocaust: Focusing on Ashes to Ashes and Sophie’s Choice\",\"authors\":\"Ranhee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many Holocaust survivors have ‘failed experience’ as a trauma, and whenever they remember Auschwitz, they live paralyzed by the shame of being human and of having survived alone. Due to the ‘unrepresentability’ of the Holocaust, their experience is ‘disrupted,’ and they are unable to express or talk about their past experiences. It is because the nature of their experiences is in no way covered by the terms and positions the symbolic order offers to them. These survivors live with the horrors of the Holocaust trauma, but are haunted by them. Thus, when they verbalize their experience, the form they dictate is ‘discursive.’ Even now, decades after the fall of the Nazis, the Holocaust is as vivid as it was yesterday because of literary works as ‘survivor testimonial literature’ and films dealing with the tragedy, a representative product of the ‘memory industry’, which is constantly replaying this nightmare. Among them, Harold Pinter’s Ashes to Ashes (1996) and Alan J. Pakula’s film Sophie’s Choice (1982) are evaluated as the most difficult and eerie examples. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the memories of the two heroines, which show the state of psychological dissociation caused by the trauma of the Holocaust in Ashes to Ashes and Sophie’s Choice, are converted into language. In these two works, the female protagonists only describe the Holocaust experience verbally rather than physically representing it, which makes it invisible and forces the audience to imagine the entire situation and thus consider that, although the way in which both works deal with the Holocaust is up to the author, it is up to us to properly see and accept the survivors through the history of memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":479618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多大屠杀幸存者都有“失败的经历”作为一种创伤,每当他们想起奥斯维辛,他们就会因身为人类和独自生存的耻辱而瘫痪。由于大屠杀的“不可再现性”,他们的经历被“打乱”了,他们无法表达或谈论他们过去的经历。这是因为他们的经验的本质没有被符号秩序提供给他们的术语和立场所覆盖。这些幸存者生活在大屠杀创伤的恐怖中,但却被它们所困扰。因此,当他们用语言表达他们的经验时,他们口述的形式是“话语的”。“即使在纳粹垮台几十年后的今天,大屠杀仍然历历在目,因为‘幸存者见证文学’等文学作品和处理这场悲剧的电影——‘记忆工业’的代表产品——不断重演这一噩梦。”其中,哈罗德·品特的《尘归尘》(1996)和艾伦·j·帕库拉的《苏菲的选择》(1982)被评价为最困难、最怪异的例子。本文的目的是考察《尘归尘》和《苏菲的选择》中两位女主人公的记忆是如何转化为语言的,这些记忆表现了大屠杀创伤所造成的心理分离状态。在这两部作品中,女性主人公只是口头描述大屠杀的经历,而不是身体上的再现,这使得它变得不可见,迫使观众想象整个情况,从而认为,虽然两部作品处理大屠杀的方式取决于作者,但我们应该通过记忆的历史来正确地看待和接受幸存者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unrepresentability and Trauma of the Holocaust: Focusing on Ashes to Ashes and Sophie’s Choice
Many Holocaust survivors have ‘failed experience’ as a trauma, and whenever they remember Auschwitz, they live paralyzed by the shame of being human and of having survived alone. Due to the ‘unrepresentability’ of the Holocaust, their experience is ‘disrupted,’ and they are unable to express or talk about their past experiences. It is because the nature of their experiences is in no way covered by the terms and positions the symbolic order offers to them. These survivors live with the horrors of the Holocaust trauma, but are haunted by them. Thus, when they verbalize their experience, the form they dictate is ‘discursive.’ Even now, decades after the fall of the Nazis, the Holocaust is as vivid as it was yesterday because of literary works as ‘survivor testimonial literature’ and films dealing with the tragedy, a representative product of the ‘memory industry’, which is constantly replaying this nightmare. Among them, Harold Pinter’s Ashes to Ashes (1996) and Alan J. Pakula’s film Sophie’s Choice (1982) are evaluated as the most difficult and eerie examples. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the memories of the two heroines, which show the state of psychological dissociation caused by the trauma of the Holocaust in Ashes to Ashes and Sophie’s Choice, are converted into language. In these two works, the female protagonists only describe the Holocaust experience verbally rather than physically representing it, which makes it invisible and forces the audience to imagine the entire situation and thus consider that, although the way in which both works deal with the Holocaust is up to the author, it is up to us to properly see and accept the survivors through the history of memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信