新的“大博弈”?中国崛起时期的非殖民化军演

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
Leo T. S. Ching
{"title":"新的“大博弈”?中国崛起时期的非殖民化军演","authors":"Leo T. S. Ching","doi":"10.1080/14649373.2023.2242147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe “new” Great Game suggests that, like the imperial competition of the past, we are witnessing a trans-imperial moment whereby Japan and China are vying for hegemony in East Asia. This is a new moment because East Asia, unlike Europe, has never had two co-existing superpowers. The prospect of a new imperial competition is complicated by the still-present American military power and the non-statist arena, especially in popular culture, where the imperial games are played out. Using two popular anti-Japan videogames, Glorious Mission Online (2013) and The Invisible Guardian (2019) as case studies, I argue these games are symptomatic of the relations between warfare and game in general. I then outline the trend in game development that subverts conventional wargames. Finally, I speculate on alternative game design over the disputed territories in the Southern China Sea that prioritizes ecology over human conflict and development.KEYWORDS: Wargamesanti-Japandecolonizationgame designChina’s rise Notes1 The distinction between real and virtual warfare is beginning to breakdown. As US General Martin Demsey discussed with our students in the Games and Culture class at Duke University some years ago, drone pilots also suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after their missions not unlike soldiers fighting in the battlefields.2 For a critique of the Second Amendment that justifies gun ownership in the US and its historical efforts to disenfranchise African Americans see Carol Anderson, The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America.3 As Darren Byler has argued, the Chinese state has appropriated the American term, War on Terror, to implement surveillance technologies and “re-education” camps to Sinicize Uyghur Muslim communities in Xinjiang (Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLeo T. S. ChingLeo T. S. Ching teaches Japanese and East Asian Cultural Studies at Duke University. He is the author of Anti-Japan: The Politics of Sentiment in Postcolonial East Asia (Duke University Press, 2019).","PeriodicalId":46080,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new “Great Game”? Decolonizing wargames in the era of China’s rise\",\"authors\":\"Leo T. S. Ching\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649373.2023.2242147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe “new” Great Game suggests that, like the imperial competition of the past, we are witnessing a trans-imperial moment whereby Japan and China are vying for hegemony in East Asia. This is a new moment because East Asia, unlike Europe, has never had two co-existing superpowers. The prospect of a new imperial competition is complicated by the still-present American military power and the non-statist arena, especially in popular culture, where the imperial games are played out. Using two popular anti-Japan videogames, Glorious Mission Online (2013) and The Invisible Guardian (2019) as case studies, I argue these games are symptomatic of the relations between warfare and game in general. I then outline the trend in game development that subverts conventional wargames. Finally, I speculate on alternative game design over the disputed territories in the Southern China Sea that prioritizes ecology over human conflict and development.KEYWORDS: Wargamesanti-Japandecolonizationgame designChina’s rise Notes1 The distinction between real and virtual warfare is beginning to breakdown. As US General Martin Demsey discussed with our students in the Games and Culture class at Duke University some years ago, drone pilots also suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after their missions not unlike soldiers fighting in the battlefields.2 For a critique of the Second Amendment that justifies gun ownership in the US and its historical efforts to disenfranchise African Americans see Carol Anderson, The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America.3 As Darren Byler has argued, the Chinese state has appropriated the American term, War on Terror, to implement surveillance technologies and “re-education” camps to Sinicize Uyghur Muslim communities in Xinjiang (Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLeo T. S. ChingLeo T. S. Ching teaches Japanese and East Asian Cultural Studies at Duke University. He is the author of Anti-Japan: The Politics of Sentiment in Postcolonial East Asia (Duke University Press, 2019).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2242147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2242147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要“新”大博弈表明,就像过去的帝国竞争一样,我们正在见证一个超越帝国的时刻,日本和中国正在争夺东亚的霸权。这是一个新的时刻,因为与欧洲不同,东亚从来没有两个超级大国共存过。新帝国竞争的前景由于美国依然存在的军事力量和非国家主义的舞台而变得复杂,特别是在流行文化中,帝国主义的游戏已经结束。以两款流行的反日电子游戏《光荣使命》(2013)和《隐形守护者》(2019)为例,我认为这两款游戏是战争和游戏之间关系的典型代表。然后我概述了颠覆传统战争游戏的游戏开发趋势。最后,我推测关于南中国海争议领土的替代游戏设计将优先考虑生态而不是人类冲突和发展。关键词:战争游戏抗日殖民主义游戏设计中国的崛起真实战争和虚拟战争之间的区别开始消失。几年前,美国将军马丁·登姆西(Martin Demsey)在杜克大学的游戏与文化课上与我们的学生讨论过,无人机飞行员在执行任务后也会患上创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),就像在战场上作战的士兵一样关于对第二修正案的批评,该修正案证明了美国拥有枪支的合法性,以及它剥夺非洲裔美国人权利的历史努力,请参阅卡罗尔·安德森的《第二:一个致命不平等的美国的种族和枪支》。正如达伦·拜勒所认为的那样,中国政府盗用了美国的术语“反恐战争”,实施监视技术和“再教育”营地,将新疆维吾尔族穆斯林社区汉化(Citation2022)。附加信息:作者简介:程东生在杜克大学教授日语和东亚文化研究。他是《反日:后殖民东亚的情感政治》(杜克大学出版社,2019年)的作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The new “Great Game”? Decolonizing wargames in the era of China’s rise
ABSTRACTThe “new” Great Game suggests that, like the imperial competition of the past, we are witnessing a trans-imperial moment whereby Japan and China are vying for hegemony in East Asia. This is a new moment because East Asia, unlike Europe, has never had two co-existing superpowers. The prospect of a new imperial competition is complicated by the still-present American military power and the non-statist arena, especially in popular culture, where the imperial games are played out. Using two popular anti-Japan videogames, Glorious Mission Online (2013) and The Invisible Guardian (2019) as case studies, I argue these games are symptomatic of the relations between warfare and game in general. I then outline the trend in game development that subverts conventional wargames. Finally, I speculate on alternative game design over the disputed territories in the Southern China Sea that prioritizes ecology over human conflict and development.KEYWORDS: Wargamesanti-Japandecolonizationgame designChina’s rise Notes1 The distinction between real and virtual warfare is beginning to breakdown. As US General Martin Demsey discussed with our students in the Games and Culture class at Duke University some years ago, drone pilots also suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after their missions not unlike soldiers fighting in the battlefields.2 For a critique of the Second Amendment that justifies gun ownership in the US and its historical efforts to disenfranchise African Americans see Carol Anderson, The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America.3 As Darren Byler has argued, the Chinese state has appropriated the American term, War on Terror, to implement surveillance technologies and “re-education” camps to Sinicize Uyghur Muslim communities in Xinjiang (Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLeo T. S. ChingLeo T. S. Ching teaches Japanese and East Asian Cultural Studies at Duke University. He is the author of Anti-Japan: The Politics of Sentiment in Postcolonial East Asia (Duke University Press, 2019).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The cultural question is among the most important yet difficult subjects facing inter-Asia today. Throughout the 20th century, worldwide competition over capital, colonial history, and the Cold War has jeopardized interactions among cultures. Globalization of technology, regionalization of economy and the end of the Cold War have opened up a unique opportunity for cultural exchanges to take place. In response to global cultural changes, cultural studies has emerged internationally as an energetic field of scholarship. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies gives a long overdue voice, throughout the global intellectual community, to those concerned with inter-Asia processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信