检测巴基斯坦血液透析患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的抗刺突IgG抗体反应

Sidra Cheema, Numan Javed, Samreen Gilani, Manal Cheema, Zain Tariq, Zeeshan Butt, Shafiq Cheema
{"title":"检测巴基斯坦血液透析患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的抗刺突IgG抗体反应","authors":"Sidra Cheema, Numan Javed, Samreen Gilani, Manal Cheema, Zain Tariq, Zeeshan Butt, Shafiq Cheema","doi":"10.59058/jaimc.v21i2.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current state of the evidence is equivocal for IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Here, we assess the immune response in hemodialysis patients who have received a complete series of vaccines with or without a history of prior COVID infection irrespective of the vaccine administered. In this cross-sectional study, we obtained serum samples from Hemodialysis patients (n = 101). Our study found that nearly three-quarters of patients (72.2%) had two doses of either Sinovac or Sinopharm vaccine administered, and ninety-seven percent of participants were considered seropositive (COVID Ab titers > 7.1 BAU/ml). Mean COVID19 spike antibody titers were 1892.4 BAU/mL and median titers were 971 BAU/mL. The comparative analysis was performed between patients who completed two-doses less than 6 months ago and more than 6 months ago when their antibody levels were measured. Mean and median antibody titers were 1895.8 and 792 BAU/mL in the former group compared to 1981.1 and 1033 BAU/mL respectively (P value 0.84) in the latter group, indicating no significant difference. There were also no statistically significant differences in IgG antibodies among subgroups defined by diabetes, hypertension, CAD or gender. However, older patients (age >55 years) had significantly higher anti-spike antibody titers as compared to younger patients (2417.8 BAU/mL vs 1377.3 BAU/mL, P value 0.008). The result of this study provides important evidence, which can lead to vaccine efficacy especially in older populations. Future studies should address whether booster vaccination may play a role in providing an effective and long-lasting protection among vulnerable patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.","PeriodicalId":492993,"journal":{"name":"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring anti-spike IgG Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Sidra Cheema, Numan Javed, Samreen Gilani, Manal Cheema, Zain Tariq, Zeeshan Butt, Shafiq Cheema\",\"doi\":\"10.59058/jaimc.v21i2.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current state of the evidence is equivocal for IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Here, we assess the immune response in hemodialysis patients who have received a complete series of vaccines with or without a history of prior COVID infection irrespective of the vaccine administered. In this cross-sectional study, we obtained serum samples from Hemodialysis patients (n = 101). Our study found that nearly three-quarters of patients (72.2%) had two doses of either Sinovac or Sinopharm vaccine administered, and ninety-seven percent of participants were considered seropositive (COVID Ab titers > 7.1 BAU/ml). Mean COVID19 spike antibody titers were 1892.4 BAU/mL and median titers were 971 BAU/mL. The comparative analysis was performed between patients who completed two-doses less than 6 months ago and more than 6 months ago when their antibody levels were measured. Mean and median antibody titers were 1895.8 and 792 BAU/mL in the former group compared to 1981.1 and 1033 BAU/mL respectively (P value 0.84) in the latter group, indicating no significant difference. There were also no statistically significant differences in IgG antibodies among subgroups defined by diabetes, hypertension, CAD or gender. However, older patients (age >55 years) had significantly higher anti-spike antibody titers as compared to younger patients (2417.8 BAU/mL vs 1377.3 BAU/mL, P value 0.008). The result of this study provides important evidence, which can lead to vaccine efficacy especially in older populations. Future studies should address whether booster vaccination may play a role in providing an effective and long-lasting protection among vulnerable patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":492993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i2.115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIMC Journal of Allama Iqbal Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59058/jaimc.v21i2.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血液透析患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的IgG抗体反应目前的证据状态是模棱两可的。在这里,我们评估了接受过完整系列疫苗的血液透析患者的免疫反应,无论是否有COVID感染史,无论接种哪种疫苗。在这项横断面研究中,我们获得了血液透析患者的血清样本(n = 101)。我们的研究发现,近四分之三的患者(72.2%)接种了两剂中国科兴或国药集团的疫苗,97%的参与者被认为是血清阳性(COVID - Ab滴度>7.1鲍起静/毫升)。平均抗体滴度为1892.4 BAU/mL,中位滴度为971 BAU/mL。比较分析是在6个月前完成两次剂量的患者和6个月前完成两次剂量的患者之间进行的,当时测量了他们的抗体水平。前者抗体滴度均值为1895.8、792 BAU/mL,后者抗体滴度均值为1981.1、1033 BAU/mL (P值0.84),差异无统计学意义。在以糖尿病、高血压、CAD或性别定义的亚组中,IgG抗体也无统计学差异。然而,老年患者(55岁)的抗刺突抗体滴度明显高于年轻患者(2417.8 BAU/mL vs 1377.3 BAU/mL, P值0.008)。这项研究的结果提供了重要的证据,这可能导致疫苗的效力,特别是在老年人群中。未来的研究应该探讨加强疫苗接种是否可以在接受血液透析治疗的易感患者中发挥有效和持久的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring anti-spike IgG Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Pakistan
The current state of the evidence is equivocal for IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Here, we assess the immune response in hemodialysis patients who have received a complete series of vaccines with or without a history of prior COVID infection irrespective of the vaccine administered. In this cross-sectional study, we obtained serum samples from Hemodialysis patients (n = 101). Our study found that nearly three-quarters of patients (72.2%) had two doses of either Sinovac or Sinopharm vaccine administered, and ninety-seven percent of participants were considered seropositive (COVID Ab titers > 7.1 BAU/ml). Mean COVID19 spike antibody titers were 1892.4 BAU/mL and median titers were 971 BAU/mL. The comparative analysis was performed between patients who completed two-doses less than 6 months ago and more than 6 months ago when their antibody levels were measured. Mean and median antibody titers were 1895.8 and 792 BAU/mL in the former group compared to 1981.1 and 1033 BAU/mL respectively (P value 0.84) in the latter group, indicating no significant difference. There were also no statistically significant differences in IgG antibodies among subgroups defined by diabetes, hypertension, CAD or gender. However, older patients (age >55 years) had significantly higher anti-spike antibody titers as compared to younger patients (2417.8 BAU/mL vs 1377.3 BAU/mL, P value 0.008). The result of this study provides important evidence, which can lead to vaccine efficacy especially in older populations. Future studies should address whether booster vaccination may play a role in providing an effective and long-lasting protection among vulnerable patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信