Suzanne J. Rhoades, Timothy J. Caldwell, Scott McBain, Rene Henery, Natalie Stauffer-Olsen, Tara McKinnon, Gabriel J. Rossi, Sudeep Chandra
{"title":"将鳟鱼生物能作为一种基于过程的工具,用于估算受管制河流的生态风险","authors":"Suzanne J. Rhoades, Timothy J. Caldwell, Scott McBain, Rene Henery, Natalie Stauffer-Olsen, Tara McKinnon, Gabriel J. Rossi, Sudeep Chandra","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.13173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bioenergetics models produce quantitative flow-ecology relationships that summarize changes in habitat and food resources from altered flows. We used a drift-foraging bioenergetics model to quantify the net rate of energetic intake (NREI) for trout above and below a water diversion. NREI is reduced by >95% below the water diversion in July–September, when up to 98% of unimpaired flows are diverted. We then used a risk-based approach to estimate the maximum diversion rate, expressed as a percentage of unimpaired flow, that would produce NREI values that are not significantly lower than values under unimpaired flows throughout a 62-year period. NREI decreased with increased precent-of-flow diversion rates in low-flow months (July–September). Diversion rates of 16% in July and 9% in August and September would maintain NREI within the range of unimpaired flow conditions. In higher flow months, May–June, increasing diversions brought estimated instream flows closer to the peak NREI flow, leading to the assessment that increased diversions would increase NREI. Bioenergetic models can be used to develop protective flow rates at times of the year when fish growth and production would be high under unimpaired flows, which often coincides with when water is diverted. Our study is the first to develop protective percent-of-flow diversion rates for holistic flow management using a quantitative process-based and fish-centric ecological metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"60 2","pages":"287-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.13173","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trout bioenergetics as a process-based tool to estimate ecological risk in a regulated river\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne J. Rhoades, Timothy J. Caldwell, Scott McBain, Rene Henery, Natalie Stauffer-Olsen, Tara McKinnon, Gabriel J. Rossi, Sudeep Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1752-1688.13173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bioenergetics models produce quantitative flow-ecology relationships that summarize changes in habitat and food resources from altered flows. We used a drift-foraging bioenergetics model to quantify the net rate of energetic intake (NREI) for trout above and below a water diversion. NREI is reduced by >95% below the water diversion in July–September, when up to 98% of unimpaired flows are diverted. We then used a risk-based approach to estimate the maximum diversion rate, expressed as a percentage of unimpaired flow, that would produce NREI values that are not significantly lower than values under unimpaired flows throughout a 62-year period. NREI decreased with increased precent-of-flow diversion rates in low-flow months (July–September). Diversion rates of 16% in July and 9% in August and September would maintain NREI within the range of unimpaired flow conditions. In higher flow months, May–June, increasing diversions brought estimated instream flows closer to the peak NREI flow, leading to the assessment that increased diversions would increase NREI. Bioenergetic models can be used to develop protective flow rates at times of the year when fish growth and production would be high under unimpaired flows, which often coincides with when water is diverted. Our study is the first to develop protective percent-of-flow diversion rates for holistic flow management using a quantitative process-based and fish-centric ecological metric.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Water Resources Association\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"287-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.13173\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Water Resources Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.13173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.13173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trout bioenergetics as a process-based tool to estimate ecological risk in a regulated river
Bioenergetics models produce quantitative flow-ecology relationships that summarize changes in habitat and food resources from altered flows. We used a drift-foraging bioenergetics model to quantify the net rate of energetic intake (NREI) for trout above and below a water diversion. NREI is reduced by >95% below the water diversion in July–September, when up to 98% of unimpaired flows are diverted. We then used a risk-based approach to estimate the maximum diversion rate, expressed as a percentage of unimpaired flow, that would produce NREI values that are not significantly lower than values under unimpaired flows throughout a 62-year period. NREI decreased with increased precent-of-flow diversion rates in low-flow months (July–September). Diversion rates of 16% in July and 9% in August and September would maintain NREI within the range of unimpaired flow conditions. In higher flow months, May–June, increasing diversions brought estimated instream flows closer to the peak NREI flow, leading to the assessment that increased diversions would increase NREI. Bioenergetic models can be used to develop protective flow rates at times of the year when fish growth and production would be high under unimpaired flows, which often coincides with when water is diverted. Our study is the first to develop protective percent-of-flow diversion rates for holistic flow management using a quantitative process-based and fish-centric ecological metric.
期刊介绍:
JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy.
JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.