民粹主义时代的日常生活、民主和教育

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Leszek Koczanowicz, Rafał Włodarczyk
{"title":"民粹主义时代的日常生活、民主和教育","authors":"Leszek Koczanowicz, Rafał Włodarczyk","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2023.2282351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn our day and age, everyday life has become a receptacle of various spheres of human life and development. Its expansion and current role of the main reference point for the valuation of phenomena and processes can be seen in the media, various branches of the economy, politics, education, religion, science, art, new technologies, etc. Therefore, the question that we seek to answer in our article is the following: what is the role of democratic politics and educational practice in the context of the modern appreciation of everyday life as the most essential locus of human life?KEYWORDS: Everyday lifepoliticseducationdemocracypopulismmodernity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. This relationship is, naturally, highlighted in Dewey’s seminal Democracy and Education, published in 1916. Still, it is in order to recall in the context of relations between education and everyday life his work from a decade before, The Child and the Curriculum.2. This allegation has, of course, a longer tradition, and we can distinguish several levels in ‘detachment’ itself; see Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 107–120.3. Importantly, Thomas More’s Utopia of 1516, which in time became a major cultural text and at the same time a paradigmatic text for the entire vibrant literary genre, puts everydayness at the center of the narrative of an ideal social organization; see Sargent (Citation2010), 4–5; Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 152–160.4. The idea of non-consensual democracy is developed in the book: Koczanowicz (Citation2015).Additional informationFundingThe article is the result of research project “The Aesthetics of Populism. Political struggle and the aesthetics experience in Poland after 1989” funded by the National Science Center (no. 2019/35/B/HS2/01187).","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyday life, democracy and education in the age of populism\",\"authors\":\"Leszek Koczanowicz, Rafał Włodarczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17449642.2023.2282351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIn our day and age, everyday life has become a receptacle of various spheres of human life and development. Its expansion and current role of the main reference point for the valuation of phenomena and processes can be seen in the media, various branches of the economy, politics, education, religion, science, art, new technologies, etc. Therefore, the question that we seek to answer in our article is the following: what is the role of democratic politics and educational practice in the context of the modern appreciation of everyday life as the most essential locus of human life?KEYWORDS: Everyday lifepoliticseducationdemocracypopulismmodernity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. This relationship is, naturally, highlighted in Dewey’s seminal Democracy and Education, published in 1916. Still, it is in order to recall in the context of relations between education and everyday life his work from a decade before, The Child and the Curriculum.2. This allegation has, of course, a longer tradition, and we can distinguish several levels in ‘detachment’ itself; see Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 107–120.3. Importantly, Thomas More’s Utopia of 1516, which in time became a major cultural text and at the same time a paradigmatic text for the entire vibrant literary genre, puts everydayness at the center of the narrative of an ideal social organization; see Sargent (Citation2010), 4–5; Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 152–160.4. The idea of non-consensual democracy is developed in the book: Koczanowicz (Citation2015).Additional informationFundingThe article is the result of research project “The Aesthetics of Populism. Political struggle and the aesthetics experience in Poland after 1989” funded by the National Science Center (no. 2019/35/B/HS2/01187).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2282351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2023.2282351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们这个时代,日常生活已经成为人类生活和发展的各个领域的容器。在媒体、经济、政治、教育、宗教、科学、艺术、新技术等各个分支中都可以看到它的扩展和目前对现象和过程的评价的主要参考点的作用。因此,我们在文章中试图回答的问题是:在日常生活作为人类生活最基本的场所的现代欣赏背景下,民主政治和教育实践的作用是什么?关键词:日常生活、政治诱惑、民主、民粹主义、现代性披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。杜威在1916年出版的开创性著作《民主与教育》自然强调了这种关系。然而,这是为了在教育与日常生活关系的背景下回顾他十年前的作品《儿童与课程》。当然,这种说法有着更悠久的传统,我们可以从“超然”本身区分出几个层次;参见Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 107-120.3。重要的是,托马斯·莫尔1516年的《乌托邦》,后来成为一个主要的文化文本,同时也是整个充满活力的文学类型的范例文本,它将日常生活置于理想社会组织叙事的中心;参见Sargent (Citation2010), 4-5;Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 152-160.4。非共识民主的概念在kozzanowicz (Citation2015)一书中得到了发展。本文是“民粹主义美学”研究项目的成果。1989年后波兰的政治斗争与美学经验”,由国家科学中心资助(编号:2019/35 / B / HS2/01187)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Everyday life, democracy and education in the age of populism
ABSTRACTIn our day and age, everyday life has become a receptacle of various spheres of human life and development. Its expansion and current role of the main reference point for the valuation of phenomena and processes can be seen in the media, various branches of the economy, politics, education, religion, science, art, new technologies, etc. Therefore, the question that we seek to answer in our article is the following: what is the role of democratic politics and educational practice in the context of the modern appreciation of everyday life as the most essential locus of human life?KEYWORDS: Everyday lifepoliticseducationdemocracypopulismmodernity Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. This relationship is, naturally, highlighted in Dewey’s seminal Democracy and Education, published in 1916. Still, it is in order to recall in the context of relations between education and everyday life his work from a decade before, The Child and the Curriculum.2. This allegation has, of course, a longer tradition, and we can distinguish several levels in ‘detachment’ itself; see Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 107–120.3. Importantly, Thomas More’s Utopia of 1516, which in time became a major cultural text and at the same time a paradigmatic text for the entire vibrant literary genre, puts everydayness at the center of the narrative of an ideal social organization; see Sargent (Citation2010), 4–5; Włodarczyk (Citation2022), 152–160.4. The idea of non-consensual democracy is developed in the book: Koczanowicz (Citation2015).Additional informationFundingThe article is the result of research project “The Aesthetics of Populism. Political struggle and the aesthetics experience in Poland after 1989” funded by the National Science Center (no. 2019/35/B/HS2/01187).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信