{"title":"电子通讯服务供应商在一般和不加区分地保留交通和位置数据方面的义务-对法院(大分庭)2022年4月5日C-140/20 G.D.诉Garda专员Síochána及其他案件判决的评论","authors":"Oskar Ratajczak","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, the issue of indiscriminate and general retention of traffic and location data has been considered many times by the Court of Justice. The Court has concluded that this is a tool that violates the rights included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and that its further use should be limited only to the most serious purposes. In the commented judgment, the right of Member States to impose obligation of indiscriminate and general retention of data of users of this network onto the providers of electronic communications services was limited to precisely defined situations and in certain situations, methods of data retention that are less infringing on fundamental rights were explicitly named and allowed by the Court.","PeriodicalId":472184,"journal":{"name":"Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obligations of the providers of electronic communications services in terms of the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – a commentary on the Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022 in the Case C-140/20 G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.\",\"authors\":\"Oskar Ratajczak\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, the issue of indiscriminate and general retention of traffic and location data has been considered many times by the Court of Justice. The Court has concluded that this is a tool that violates the rights included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and that its further use should be limited only to the most serious purposes. In the commented judgment, the right of Member States to impose obligation of indiscriminate and general retention of data of users of this network onto the providers of electronic communications services was limited to precisely defined situations and in certain situations, methods of data retention that are less infringing on fundamental rights were explicitly named and allowed by the Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":472184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Obligations of the providers of electronic communications services in terms of the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – a commentary on the Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022 in the Case C-140/20 G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.
Over the years, the issue of indiscriminate and general retention of traffic and location data has been considered many times by the Court of Justice. The Court has concluded that this is a tool that violates the rights included in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and that its further use should be limited only to the most serious purposes. In the commented judgment, the right of Member States to impose obligation of indiscriminate and general retention of data of users of this network onto the providers of electronic communications services was limited to precisely defined situations and in certain situations, methods of data retention that are less infringing on fundamental rights were explicitly named and allowed by the Court.