民国早期小学科学教材如何表现科学素养?

Sena COŞĞUN KANDAL, Adem KENAN
{"title":"民国早期小学科学教材如何表现科学素养?","authors":"Sena COŞĞUN KANDAL, Adem KENAN","doi":"10.53048/johass.1373675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the investigation aimed to determine whether there was a balanced distribution among the science literacy dimensions in science textbooks and whether these textbooks could prepare scientifically literate citizens in the early Turkish Republic (1926-1948). Additionally, the research sought to compare the distribution of science literacy in the textbooks of that period with those of the present day. The research used the content analysis method to examine three textbooks for the 4th and 5th grades, prepared according to the 1926 and 1936 curricula. Among the books examined, a balance is seen in the dimensions of science literacy only in the object textbook prepared according to the 1926 program. The fact that most of the content in the books related to the 1936 program is in the dimension of science as knowledge shows that there is no balance in the dimensions of science literacy. The dimension of science as a way of thinking is the least seen dimension in the textbooks examined. In general, it has been concluded that science literacy has yet to be balanced since the 1936 curriculum. This situation coincides with current research.","PeriodicalId":470135,"journal":{"name":"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Was the Science Literacy Demonstrated in Primary Science Textbooks in Early Republican Türkiye?\",\"authors\":\"Sena COŞĞUN KANDAL, Adem KENAN\",\"doi\":\"10.53048/johass.1373675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this research, the investigation aimed to determine whether there was a balanced distribution among the science literacy dimensions in science textbooks and whether these textbooks could prepare scientifically literate citizens in the early Turkish Republic (1926-1948). Additionally, the research sought to compare the distribution of science literacy in the textbooks of that period with those of the present day. The research used the content analysis method to examine three textbooks for the 4th and 5th grades, prepared according to the 1926 and 1936 curricula. Among the books examined, a balance is seen in the dimensions of science literacy only in the object textbook prepared according to the 1926 program. The fact that most of the content in the books related to the 1936 program is in the dimension of science as knowledge shows that there is no balance in the dimensions of science literacy. The dimension of science as a way of thinking is the least seen dimension in the textbooks examined. In general, it has been concluded that science literacy has yet to be balanced since the 1936 curriculum. This situation coincides with current research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":470135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1373675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1373675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,调查旨在确定科学教科书中的科学素养维度之间是否存在平衡分布,以及这些教科书是否可以培养早期土耳其共和国(1926-1948)的科学素养公民。此外,该研究还试图比较那个时期和当今教科书中科学素养的分布情况。此次研究以1926年和1936年的课程为基础,对4、5年级的3本教科书进行了内容分析。在被检查的书籍中,只有根据1926年计划编写的实物教科书在科学素养的维度上看到了平衡。事实上,与1936年计划有关的书籍中的大部分内容都是在科学作为知识的维度上,这表明科学素养的维度没有平衡。科学作为一种思维方式的维度是教科书中最少看到的维度。总的来说,人们得出的结论是,自1936年的课程以来,科学素养尚未得到平衡。这种情况与目前的研究不谋而合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Was the Science Literacy Demonstrated in Primary Science Textbooks in Early Republican Türkiye?
In this research, the investigation aimed to determine whether there was a balanced distribution among the science literacy dimensions in science textbooks and whether these textbooks could prepare scientifically literate citizens in the early Turkish Republic (1926-1948). Additionally, the research sought to compare the distribution of science literacy in the textbooks of that period with those of the present day. The research used the content analysis method to examine three textbooks for the 4th and 5th grades, prepared according to the 1926 and 1936 curricula. Among the books examined, a balance is seen in the dimensions of science literacy only in the object textbook prepared according to the 1926 program. The fact that most of the content in the books related to the 1936 program is in the dimension of science as knowledge shows that there is no balance in the dimensions of science literacy. The dimension of science as a way of thinking is the least seen dimension in the textbooks examined. In general, it has been concluded that science literacy has yet to be balanced since the 1936 curriculum. This situation coincides with current research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信