{"title":"La Villemarque的Barzaz-Breiz(1839-1845-1867):一部重塑自我的浪漫小说","authors":"Nelly Blanchard","doi":"10.54586/qjld3419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1839, Viscount Théodore Hersart de La Villemarqué published the Barzaz-Breiz (The Popular Ballads of Brittany) at his own expense. He was only 24 years old at the time. This book would bring him fame, give him a name and was to influence all of his future work. The Barzaz-Breiz was then further developed and modified twice afterwards, in 1845 and 1867. To this day it remains one of the best known books in Breton language literature. There are several reasons why the Barzaz-Breiz should not be reduced to just a collection of popular ballads as its title and research on the subject suggest. First of all, the authenticity of the songs of the Barzaz-Breiz and their possible modification, manipulation — or even their total invention by de la Villemarqué — have been the object of so much scholarly debate since the beginning of what came to be called the Barzaz-Breiz dispute, that attention has almost exclusively been focused on the ballads, leaving the rest of the text in the shadows. Secondly, there is a yawning chasm separating La Villemarqué’s work from that of his contemporaries who also collected popular songs. The book forms a space which is made up of de la Villemarqué’s words and serves as the locus for his reallocation of meanings to words. What we are given to read here is no less than a dissertation about the author himself. This paper therefore posits that the Barzaz-Breiz is not a mere collection of popular songs but rather a text — de la Villemarqué is not a mere collector but an author.","PeriodicalId":370965,"journal":{"name":"Studia Celto-Slavica","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Villemarque's Barzaz-Breiz (1839-1845-1867): A Romantic Fiction to Reinvent Oneself\",\"authors\":\"Nelly Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.54586/qjld3419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1839, Viscount Théodore Hersart de La Villemarqué published the Barzaz-Breiz (The Popular Ballads of Brittany) at his own expense. He was only 24 years old at the time. This book would bring him fame, give him a name and was to influence all of his future work. The Barzaz-Breiz was then further developed and modified twice afterwards, in 1845 and 1867. To this day it remains one of the best known books in Breton language literature. There are several reasons why the Barzaz-Breiz should not be reduced to just a collection of popular ballads as its title and research on the subject suggest. First of all, the authenticity of the songs of the Barzaz-Breiz and their possible modification, manipulation — or even their total invention by de la Villemarqué — have been the object of so much scholarly debate since the beginning of what came to be called the Barzaz-Breiz dispute, that attention has almost exclusively been focused on the ballads, leaving the rest of the text in the shadows. Secondly, there is a yawning chasm separating La Villemarqué’s work from that of his contemporaries who also collected popular songs. The book forms a space which is made up of de la Villemarqué’s words and serves as the locus for his reallocation of meanings to words. What we are given to read here is no less than a dissertation about the author himself. This paper therefore posits that the Barzaz-Breiz is not a mere collection of popular songs but rather a text — de la Villemarqué is not a mere collector but an author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Celto-Slavica\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Celto-Slavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54586/qjld3419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Celto-Slavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54586/qjld3419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1839年,thsamodore Hersart de La villemarqu子爵自费出版了《布列塔尼流行歌谣》(Barzaz-Breiz)。当时他只有24岁。这本书给他带来了名声,给了他一个名字,并影响了他未来的所有工作。随后,在1845年和1867年,Barzaz-Breiz被进一步发展和修改了两次。直到今天,它仍然是布列塔尼语言文学中最著名的书籍之一。《巴扎兹-布雷兹》不应该像它的名字和对这一主题的研究所表明的那样,被简化为一部流行民谣的合集,这有几个原因。首先,巴扎兹-布雷兹的歌曲的真实性及其可能的修改、操纵——甚至是德拉·维尔马奎斯的完全捏造——自从所谓的巴扎兹-布雷兹之争开始以来,一直是许多学术争论的对象,人们的注意力几乎完全集中在民谣上,而把其余的文本置于阴影之中。其次,拉维勒侯爵的作品与他同时代也收集流行歌曲的人的作品之间存在着巨大的鸿沟。这本书形成了一个由德拉维尔伯爵的文字组成的空间,并成为他重新分配文字意义的场所。我们在这里读到的,不亚于一篇关于作者本人的论文。因此,本文认为《巴扎兹-布雷兹》不仅仅是流行歌曲的合集,而是一部文本——德拉·维尔马奎斯不仅是一个收藏家,而且是一个作者。
La Villemarque's Barzaz-Breiz (1839-1845-1867): A Romantic Fiction to Reinvent Oneself
In 1839, Viscount Théodore Hersart de La Villemarqué published the Barzaz-Breiz (The Popular Ballads of Brittany) at his own expense. He was only 24 years old at the time. This book would bring him fame, give him a name and was to influence all of his future work. The Barzaz-Breiz was then further developed and modified twice afterwards, in 1845 and 1867. To this day it remains one of the best known books in Breton language literature. There are several reasons why the Barzaz-Breiz should not be reduced to just a collection of popular ballads as its title and research on the subject suggest. First of all, the authenticity of the songs of the Barzaz-Breiz and their possible modification, manipulation — or even their total invention by de la Villemarqué — have been the object of so much scholarly debate since the beginning of what came to be called the Barzaz-Breiz dispute, that attention has almost exclusively been focused on the ballads, leaving the rest of the text in the shadows. Secondly, there is a yawning chasm separating La Villemarqué’s work from that of his contemporaries who also collected popular songs. The book forms a space which is made up of de la Villemarqué’s words and serves as the locus for his reallocation of meanings to words. What we are given to read here is no less than a dissertation about the author himself. This paper therefore posits that the Barzaz-Breiz is not a mere collection of popular songs but rather a text — de la Villemarqué is not a mere collector but an author.