通过患者安全事件响应框架实现恢复性公正文化

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olivia Lounsbury, Mark Sujan
{"title":"通过患者安全事件响应框架实现恢复性公正文化","authors":"Olivia Lounsbury, Mark Sujan","doi":"10.1177/25160435231194397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite years of calls for adoption of a Just Culture, it is evident that taking this concept from paper to practice has been slower than expected. Many have cited the subpar application of the Just Culture framework and, recently, questions have been raised regarding how the Just Culture framework is perceived by those impacted by harm, including patients, family members, and staff. Though this framework is one tool that can be used to guide inquiry after harm events, its use, independent of active efforts toward restoration of relationships with patients, families, and staff, could compromise engagement and therefore learning. A lack of focus on restoring the trust of those affected by harm in parallel with the event investigation introduces a risk of further compounding the harm for all involved. Those involved in safety work at NHS England have recognized the need to apply a systems mindset within a concerted effort toward more compassionate engagement for optimal learning and improvement. In response, they have included compassionate engagement and involvement of those affected by patient safety incidents as a foundational pillar in the NHS England Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving a restorative Just Culture through the patient safety incident response framework\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Lounsbury, Mark Sujan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435231194397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite years of calls for adoption of a Just Culture, it is evident that taking this concept from paper to practice has been slower than expected. Many have cited the subpar application of the Just Culture framework and, recently, questions have been raised regarding how the Just Culture framework is perceived by those impacted by harm, including patients, family members, and staff. Though this framework is one tool that can be used to guide inquiry after harm events, its use, independent of active efforts toward restoration of relationships with patients, families, and staff, could compromise engagement and therefore learning. A lack of focus on restoring the trust of those affected by harm in parallel with the event investigation introduces a risk of further compounding the harm for all involved. Those involved in safety work at NHS England have recognized the need to apply a systems mindset within a concerted effort toward more compassionate engagement for optimal learning and improvement. In response, they have included compassionate engagement and involvement of those affected by patient safety incidents as a foundational pillar in the NHS England Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231194397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231194397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管多年来一直呼吁采用公正的文化,但很明显,将这一概念从文件到实践的速度比预期的要慢。许多人引用了公正文化框架的低水平应用,最近,人们提出了关于受伤害影响的人(包括患者、家属和工作人员)如何看待公正文化框架的问题。虽然该框架是一种可用于指导伤害事件后调查的工具,但如果不积极努力恢复与患者、家属和工作人员的关系,它的使用可能会损害参与,从而影响学习。在进行事件调查的同时,缺乏对恢复受伤害者信任的重视,可能会进一步加剧对所有相关人员的伤害。那些在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)从事安全工作的人已经认识到,需要在协调一致的努力中运用系统思维,以更富有同情心的方式参与到最佳的学习和改进中。作为回应,他们已经将那些受患者安全事件影响的人的富有同情心的参与和参与作为NHS英格兰患者安全事件响应框架的基础支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achieving a restorative Just Culture through the patient safety incident response framework
Despite years of calls for adoption of a Just Culture, it is evident that taking this concept from paper to practice has been slower than expected. Many have cited the subpar application of the Just Culture framework and, recently, questions have been raised regarding how the Just Culture framework is perceived by those impacted by harm, including patients, family members, and staff. Though this framework is one tool that can be used to guide inquiry after harm events, its use, independent of active efforts toward restoration of relationships with patients, families, and staff, could compromise engagement and therefore learning. A lack of focus on restoring the trust of those affected by harm in parallel with the event investigation introduces a risk of further compounding the harm for all involved. Those involved in safety work at NHS England have recognized the need to apply a systems mindset within a concerted effort toward more compassionate engagement for optimal learning and improvement. In response, they have included compassionate engagement and involvement of those affected by patient safety incidents as a foundational pillar in the NHS England Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信