评论文章:美国占主导地位的成就意识形态助长了不平等——离家更近的战争。克里斯托弗·博纳斯蒂亚著。斯坦福，加州:斯坦福大学出版社，2022。Pp.第十七章+ 311。90.00美元(布);28.00美元(纸)。学术上的种族隔离。肖恩·j·德雷克著。奥克兰:加州大学出版社，2022。Pp.七+ 257。85.00美元(布);29.95美元(纸)。《种族至上:亚裔美国人和白人在郊区学校追求美国梦》。娜塔莎·瓦里库著。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社，…

IF 4.4 1区社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY

American Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1086/727699

Prudence Carter

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Review Essay: US Dominant Achievement Ideology Fuels Inequality The Battle Nearer to Home. By Christopher Bonastia. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2022. Pp. xvii+311. $90.00 (cloth); $28.00 (paper). Academic Apartheid. By Sean J. Drake. Oakland: University of California Press, 2022. Pp. vii+257. $85.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper). Race at the Top: Asian Americans and Whites in Pursuit of the American Dream in Suburban Schools. By Natasha Warikoo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, …

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Sociology SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

2.30%

发文量

103

期刊介绍： Established in 1895 as the first US scholarly journal in its field, the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) presents pathbreaking work from all areas of sociology, with an emphasis on theory building and innovative methods. AJS strives to speak to the general sociology reader and is open to contributions from across the social sciences—sociology, political science, economics, history, anthropology, and statistics—that seriously engage the sociological literature to forge new ways of understanding the social. AJS offers a substantial book review section that identifies the most salient work of both emerging and enduring scholars of social science. Commissioned review essays appear occasionally, offering readers a comparative, in-depth examination of prominent titles. Although AJS publishes a very small percentage of the papers submitted to it, a double-blind review process is available to all qualified submissions, making the journal a center for exchange and debate "behind" the printed page and contributing to the robustness of social science research in general.