护理工作生活质量量表的心理测试:泰文版

Pattaramon Tubsoongnoen, Jintana Yunibhand, Yupin Aungsuroch
{"title":"护理工作生活质量量表的心理测试:泰文版","authors":"Pattaramon Tubsoongnoen, Jintana Yunibhand, Yupin Aungsuroch","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Brooks Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey has been widely used to assess the quality of nursing work life. In Thailand, this scale was translated and used by nurse practitioners. However, many items designed for use have contextual differences from the hospital and have never been tested for their construct; including issues of cultural differences. Therefore, such a scale must be revised. This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties to justify its use in a hospital context.Material and Methods: This was methodological research. The process consisted of two phases; including: 1) translation using the forward-backward translation method, and 2) psychometric properties testing; content validity, cognitive interview, construct validity, and reliability would be used to evaluate psychometric properties. Content validity was considered by a panel of experts. Ten registered nurses were asked to participate in a cognitive interview. Two hundred and fourteen registered nurses were recruited, using convenience sampling for conducting the construct validity and reliability testing.Results: The findings revealed excellent content validity. Twenty-three items were revised in the phase of cognitive interviews. Internal consistency was calculated: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.959. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded four factors, and was consistent with the original version.Conclusion: The scale may be utilized by registered nurses working in Thailand’s hospital context to assess the quality of nursing work life. Further study needs to test this in larger and heterogeneous samples.","PeriodicalId":93205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Testing of the Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale: Thai Version\",\"authors\":\"Pattaramon Tubsoongnoen, Jintana Yunibhand, Yupin Aungsuroch\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.2023997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Brooks Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey has been widely used to assess the quality of nursing work life. In Thailand, this scale was translated and used by nurse practitioners. However, many items designed for use have contextual differences from the hospital and have never been tested for their construct; including issues of cultural differences. Therefore, such a scale must be revised. This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties to justify its use in a hospital context.Material and Methods: This was methodological research. The process consisted of two phases; including: 1) translation using the forward-backward translation method, and 2) psychometric properties testing; content validity, cognitive interview, construct validity, and reliability would be used to evaluate psychometric properties. Content validity was considered by a panel of experts. Ten registered nurses were asked to participate in a cognitive interview. Two hundred and fourteen registered nurses were recruited, using convenience sampling for conducting the construct validity and reliability testing.Results: The findings revealed excellent content validity. Twenty-three items were revised in the phase of cognitive interviews. Internal consistency was calculated: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.959. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded four factors, and was consistent with the original version.Conclusion: The scale may be utilized by registered nurses working in Thailand’s hospital context to assess the quality of nursing work life. Further study needs to test this in larger and heterogeneous samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:布鲁克斯护理工作生活质量调查被广泛用于评估护理工作生活质量。在泰国,这个量表被翻译并被执业护士使用。然而,许多设计使用的项目与医院有上下文差异,从未对其结构进行过测试;包括文化差异的问题。因此,必须修订这种比额表。本研究旨在翻译和测试心理测量特性,以证明其在医院环境中的使用。材料与方法:本研究为方法学研究。这个过程包括两个阶段;包括:1)采用前向后翻译法的翻译;2)心理测量特性测试;内容效度、认知访谈、构念效度和信度将被用来评估心理测量的性质。内容效度由专家小组考虑。10名注册护士被要求参加认知访谈。招募注册护士214名,采用方便抽样法进行结构效度和信度检验。结果:调查结果显示了极好的内容效度。认知访谈阶段共修改了23个项目。计算内部一致性:Cronbach 's alpha为0.959。验证性因子分析得到4个因子,与原版本一致。结论:该量表可用于泰国医院注册护士护理工作生活质量的评估。进一步的研究需要在更大的异质样本中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Testing of the Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale: Thai Version
Objective: The Brooks Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey has been widely used to assess the quality of nursing work life. In Thailand, this scale was translated and used by nurse practitioners. However, many items designed for use have contextual differences from the hospital and have never been tested for their construct; including issues of cultural differences. Therefore, such a scale must be revised. This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties to justify its use in a hospital context.Material and Methods: This was methodological research. The process consisted of two phases; including: 1) translation using the forward-backward translation method, and 2) psychometric properties testing; content validity, cognitive interview, construct validity, and reliability would be used to evaluate psychometric properties. Content validity was considered by a panel of experts. Ten registered nurses were asked to participate in a cognitive interview. Two hundred and fourteen registered nurses were recruited, using convenience sampling for conducting the construct validity and reliability testing.Results: The findings revealed excellent content validity. Twenty-three items were revised in the phase of cognitive interviews. Internal consistency was calculated: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.959. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded four factors, and was consistent with the original version.Conclusion: The scale may be utilized by registered nurses working in Thailand’s hospital context to assess the quality of nursing work life. Further study needs to test this in larger and heterogeneous samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信